Cargando…
Does timing of neoadjuvant chemotherapy influence the prognosis in patients with early triple negative breast cancer?
PURPOSE: For patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), the optimal time to initiate neoadjuvant chemotherapy (TTNC) is unknown. This study evaluates the association between TTNC and survival in patients with early TNBC. METHODS: A retrospective study using data from of a cohort of TNBC pat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10465651/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37418056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-023-05060-y |
_version_ | 1785098717484810240 |
---|---|
author | Hatzipanagiotou, Maria Eleni Pigerl, Miriam Gerken, Michael Räpple, Sophie Zeltner, Verena Hetterich, Madeleine Ugocsai, Peter Fernandez-Pacheco, Miriam Inwald, Elisabeth Christine Klinkhammer-Schalke, Monika Ortmann, Olaf Seitz, Stephan |
author_facet | Hatzipanagiotou, Maria Eleni Pigerl, Miriam Gerken, Michael Räpple, Sophie Zeltner, Verena Hetterich, Madeleine Ugocsai, Peter Fernandez-Pacheco, Miriam Inwald, Elisabeth Christine Klinkhammer-Schalke, Monika Ortmann, Olaf Seitz, Stephan |
author_sort | Hatzipanagiotou, Maria Eleni |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: For patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), the optimal time to initiate neoadjuvant chemotherapy (TTNC) is unknown. This study evaluates the association between TTNC and survival in patients with early TNBC. METHODS: A retrospective study using data from of a cohort of TNBC patients diagnosed between January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2018 registered in the Tumor Centre Regensburg was performed. Data included demographics, pathology, treatment, recurrence, and survival. Interval to treatment was defined as days from pathology diagnosis of TNBC to first dose of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). The Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression methods were used to evaluate the impact of TTNC on overall survival (OS) and 5 year OS. RESULTS: A total of 270 patients were included. Median follow up was 3.5 years. The 5-year OS estimates according to TTNC were 77.4%, 66.9%, 82.3%, 80.6%, 88.3%, 58.3%, 71.1% and 66.7% in patients who received NACT within 0–14, 15–21, 22–28, 29–35, 36–42, 43–49, 50–56 and > 56 days after diagnosis. Patients who received systemic therapy early had the highest estimated mean OS of 8.4 years, while patients who received systemic therapy after more than 56 days survived an estimated 3.3 years. CONCLUSION: The optimal time interval between diagnosis and NACT remains to be determined. However, starting NACT more than 42 days after diagnosis of TNBC seems to reduce survival. Therefore, it is strongly recommended to carry out the treatment in a certified breast center with appropriate structures, in order to enable an adequate and timely care. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10465651 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104656512023-08-31 Does timing of neoadjuvant chemotherapy influence the prognosis in patients with early triple negative breast cancer? Hatzipanagiotou, Maria Eleni Pigerl, Miriam Gerken, Michael Räpple, Sophie Zeltner, Verena Hetterich, Madeleine Ugocsai, Peter Fernandez-Pacheco, Miriam Inwald, Elisabeth Christine Klinkhammer-Schalke, Monika Ortmann, Olaf Seitz, Stephan J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Research PURPOSE: For patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), the optimal time to initiate neoadjuvant chemotherapy (TTNC) is unknown. This study evaluates the association between TTNC and survival in patients with early TNBC. METHODS: A retrospective study using data from of a cohort of TNBC patients diagnosed between January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2018 registered in the Tumor Centre Regensburg was performed. Data included demographics, pathology, treatment, recurrence, and survival. Interval to treatment was defined as days from pathology diagnosis of TNBC to first dose of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). The Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression methods were used to evaluate the impact of TTNC on overall survival (OS) and 5 year OS. RESULTS: A total of 270 patients were included. Median follow up was 3.5 years. The 5-year OS estimates according to TTNC were 77.4%, 66.9%, 82.3%, 80.6%, 88.3%, 58.3%, 71.1% and 66.7% in patients who received NACT within 0–14, 15–21, 22–28, 29–35, 36–42, 43–49, 50–56 and > 56 days after diagnosis. Patients who received systemic therapy early had the highest estimated mean OS of 8.4 years, while patients who received systemic therapy after more than 56 days survived an estimated 3.3 years. CONCLUSION: The optimal time interval between diagnosis and NACT remains to be determined. However, starting NACT more than 42 days after diagnosis of TNBC seems to reduce survival. Therefore, it is strongly recommended to carry out the treatment in a certified breast center with appropriate structures, in order to enable an adequate and timely care. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-07-07 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10465651/ /pubmed/37418056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-023-05060-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Hatzipanagiotou, Maria Eleni Pigerl, Miriam Gerken, Michael Räpple, Sophie Zeltner, Verena Hetterich, Madeleine Ugocsai, Peter Fernandez-Pacheco, Miriam Inwald, Elisabeth Christine Klinkhammer-Schalke, Monika Ortmann, Olaf Seitz, Stephan Does timing of neoadjuvant chemotherapy influence the prognosis in patients with early triple negative breast cancer? |
title | Does timing of neoadjuvant chemotherapy influence the prognosis in patients with early triple negative breast cancer? |
title_full | Does timing of neoadjuvant chemotherapy influence the prognosis in patients with early triple negative breast cancer? |
title_fullStr | Does timing of neoadjuvant chemotherapy influence the prognosis in patients with early triple negative breast cancer? |
title_full_unstemmed | Does timing of neoadjuvant chemotherapy influence the prognosis in patients with early triple negative breast cancer? |
title_short | Does timing of neoadjuvant chemotherapy influence the prognosis in patients with early triple negative breast cancer? |
title_sort | does timing of neoadjuvant chemotherapy influence the prognosis in patients with early triple negative breast cancer? |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10465651/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37418056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-023-05060-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hatzipanagiotoumariaeleni doestimingofneoadjuvantchemotherapyinfluencetheprognosisinpatientswithearlytriplenegativebreastcancer AT pigerlmiriam doestimingofneoadjuvantchemotherapyinfluencetheprognosisinpatientswithearlytriplenegativebreastcancer AT gerkenmichael doestimingofneoadjuvantchemotherapyinfluencetheprognosisinpatientswithearlytriplenegativebreastcancer AT rapplesophie doestimingofneoadjuvantchemotherapyinfluencetheprognosisinpatientswithearlytriplenegativebreastcancer AT zeltnerverena doestimingofneoadjuvantchemotherapyinfluencetheprognosisinpatientswithearlytriplenegativebreastcancer AT hetterichmadeleine doestimingofneoadjuvantchemotherapyinfluencetheprognosisinpatientswithearlytriplenegativebreastcancer AT ugocsaipeter doestimingofneoadjuvantchemotherapyinfluencetheprognosisinpatientswithearlytriplenegativebreastcancer AT fernandezpachecomiriam doestimingofneoadjuvantchemotherapyinfluencetheprognosisinpatientswithearlytriplenegativebreastcancer AT inwaldelisabethchristine doestimingofneoadjuvantchemotherapyinfluencetheprognosisinpatientswithearlytriplenegativebreastcancer AT klinkhammerschalkemonika doestimingofneoadjuvantchemotherapyinfluencetheprognosisinpatientswithearlytriplenegativebreastcancer AT ortmannolaf doestimingofneoadjuvantchemotherapyinfluencetheprognosisinpatientswithearlytriplenegativebreastcancer AT seitzstephan doestimingofneoadjuvantchemotherapyinfluencetheprognosisinpatientswithearlytriplenegativebreastcancer |