Cargando…

Does timing of neoadjuvant chemotherapy influence the prognosis in patients with early triple negative breast cancer?

PURPOSE: For patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), the optimal time to initiate neoadjuvant chemotherapy (TTNC) is unknown. This study evaluates the association between TTNC and survival in patients with early TNBC. METHODS: A retrospective study using data from of a cohort of TNBC pat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hatzipanagiotou, Maria Eleni, Pigerl, Miriam, Gerken, Michael, Räpple, Sophie, Zeltner, Verena, Hetterich, Madeleine, Ugocsai, Peter, Fernandez-Pacheco, Miriam, Inwald, Elisabeth Christine, Klinkhammer-Schalke, Monika, Ortmann, Olaf, Seitz, Stephan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10465651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37418056
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-023-05060-y
_version_ 1785098717484810240
author Hatzipanagiotou, Maria Eleni
Pigerl, Miriam
Gerken, Michael
Räpple, Sophie
Zeltner, Verena
Hetterich, Madeleine
Ugocsai, Peter
Fernandez-Pacheco, Miriam
Inwald, Elisabeth Christine
Klinkhammer-Schalke, Monika
Ortmann, Olaf
Seitz, Stephan
author_facet Hatzipanagiotou, Maria Eleni
Pigerl, Miriam
Gerken, Michael
Räpple, Sophie
Zeltner, Verena
Hetterich, Madeleine
Ugocsai, Peter
Fernandez-Pacheco, Miriam
Inwald, Elisabeth Christine
Klinkhammer-Schalke, Monika
Ortmann, Olaf
Seitz, Stephan
author_sort Hatzipanagiotou, Maria Eleni
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: For patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), the optimal time to initiate neoadjuvant chemotherapy (TTNC) is unknown. This study evaluates the association between TTNC and survival in patients with early TNBC. METHODS: A retrospective study using data from of a cohort of TNBC patients diagnosed between January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2018 registered in the Tumor Centre Regensburg was performed. Data included demographics, pathology, treatment, recurrence, and survival. Interval to treatment was defined as days from pathology diagnosis of TNBC to first dose of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). The Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression methods were used to evaluate the impact of TTNC on overall survival (OS) and 5 year OS. RESULTS: A total of 270 patients were included. Median follow up was 3.5 years. The 5-year OS estimates according to TTNC were 77.4%, 66.9%, 82.3%, 80.6%, 88.3%, 58.3%, 71.1% and 66.7% in patients who received NACT within 0–14, 15–21, 22–28, 29–35, 36–42, 43–49, 50–56 and > 56 days after diagnosis. Patients who received systemic therapy early had the highest estimated mean OS of 8.4 years, while patients who received systemic therapy after more than 56 days survived an estimated 3.3 years. CONCLUSION: The optimal time interval between diagnosis and NACT remains to be determined. However, starting NACT more than 42 days after diagnosis of TNBC seems to reduce survival. Therefore, it is strongly recommended to carry out the treatment in a certified breast center with appropriate structures, in order to enable an adequate and timely care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10465651
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104656512023-08-31 Does timing of neoadjuvant chemotherapy influence the prognosis in patients with early triple negative breast cancer? Hatzipanagiotou, Maria Eleni Pigerl, Miriam Gerken, Michael Räpple, Sophie Zeltner, Verena Hetterich, Madeleine Ugocsai, Peter Fernandez-Pacheco, Miriam Inwald, Elisabeth Christine Klinkhammer-Schalke, Monika Ortmann, Olaf Seitz, Stephan J Cancer Res Clin Oncol Research PURPOSE: For patients with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC), the optimal time to initiate neoadjuvant chemotherapy (TTNC) is unknown. This study evaluates the association between TTNC and survival in patients with early TNBC. METHODS: A retrospective study using data from of a cohort of TNBC patients diagnosed between January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2018 registered in the Tumor Centre Regensburg was performed. Data included demographics, pathology, treatment, recurrence, and survival. Interval to treatment was defined as days from pathology diagnosis of TNBC to first dose of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). The Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression methods were used to evaluate the impact of TTNC on overall survival (OS) and 5 year OS. RESULTS: A total of 270 patients were included. Median follow up was 3.5 years. The 5-year OS estimates according to TTNC were 77.4%, 66.9%, 82.3%, 80.6%, 88.3%, 58.3%, 71.1% and 66.7% in patients who received NACT within 0–14, 15–21, 22–28, 29–35, 36–42, 43–49, 50–56 and > 56 days after diagnosis. Patients who received systemic therapy early had the highest estimated mean OS of 8.4 years, while patients who received systemic therapy after more than 56 days survived an estimated 3.3 years. CONCLUSION: The optimal time interval between diagnosis and NACT remains to be determined. However, starting NACT more than 42 days after diagnosis of TNBC seems to reduce survival. Therefore, it is strongly recommended to carry out the treatment in a certified breast center with appropriate structures, in order to enable an adequate and timely care. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-07-07 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10465651/ /pubmed/37418056 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-023-05060-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research
Hatzipanagiotou, Maria Eleni
Pigerl, Miriam
Gerken, Michael
Räpple, Sophie
Zeltner, Verena
Hetterich, Madeleine
Ugocsai, Peter
Fernandez-Pacheco, Miriam
Inwald, Elisabeth Christine
Klinkhammer-Schalke, Monika
Ortmann, Olaf
Seitz, Stephan
Does timing of neoadjuvant chemotherapy influence the prognosis in patients with early triple negative breast cancer?
title Does timing of neoadjuvant chemotherapy influence the prognosis in patients with early triple negative breast cancer?
title_full Does timing of neoadjuvant chemotherapy influence the prognosis in patients with early triple negative breast cancer?
title_fullStr Does timing of neoadjuvant chemotherapy influence the prognosis in patients with early triple negative breast cancer?
title_full_unstemmed Does timing of neoadjuvant chemotherapy influence the prognosis in patients with early triple negative breast cancer?
title_short Does timing of neoadjuvant chemotherapy influence the prognosis in patients with early triple negative breast cancer?
title_sort does timing of neoadjuvant chemotherapy influence the prognosis in patients with early triple negative breast cancer?
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10465651/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37418056
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00432-023-05060-y
work_keys_str_mv AT hatzipanagiotoumariaeleni doestimingofneoadjuvantchemotherapyinfluencetheprognosisinpatientswithearlytriplenegativebreastcancer
AT pigerlmiriam doestimingofneoadjuvantchemotherapyinfluencetheprognosisinpatientswithearlytriplenegativebreastcancer
AT gerkenmichael doestimingofneoadjuvantchemotherapyinfluencetheprognosisinpatientswithearlytriplenegativebreastcancer
AT rapplesophie doestimingofneoadjuvantchemotherapyinfluencetheprognosisinpatientswithearlytriplenegativebreastcancer
AT zeltnerverena doestimingofneoadjuvantchemotherapyinfluencetheprognosisinpatientswithearlytriplenegativebreastcancer
AT hetterichmadeleine doestimingofneoadjuvantchemotherapyinfluencetheprognosisinpatientswithearlytriplenegativebreastcancer
AT ugocsaipeter doestimingofneoadjuvantchemotherapyinfluencetheprognosisinpatientswithearlytriplenegativebreastcancer
AT fernandezpachecomiriam doestimingofneoadjuvantchemotherapyinfluencetheprognosisinpatientswithearlytriplenegativebreastcancer
AT inwaldelisabethchristine doestimingofneoadjuvantchemotherapyinfluencetheprognosisinpatientswithearlytriplenegativebreastcancer
AT klinkhammerschalkemonika doestimingofneoadjuvantchemotherapyinfluencetheprognosisinpatientswithearlytriplenegativebreastcancer
AT ortmannolaf doestimingofneoadjuvantchemotherapyinfluencetheprognosisinpatientswithearlytriplenegativebreastcancer
AT seitzstephan doestimingofneoadjuvantchemotherapyinfluencetheprognosisinpatientswithearlytriplenegativebreastcancer