Cargando…
Interaction patterns of methoprene-tolerant and germ cell-expressed Drosophila JH receptors suggest significant differences in their functioning
Methoprene-tolerant (Met) and germ cell-expressed (Gce) proteins were shown to be juvenile hormone (JH) receptors of Drosophila melanogaster with partially redundant functions. We raised the question of where the functional differentiation of paralogs comes from. Therefore, we tested Met and Gce int...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10465699/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37654797 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2023.1215550 |
_version_ | 1785098730652827648 |
---|---|
author | Kolonko-Adamska, M. Zawadzka-Kazimierczuk, A. Bartosińska-Marzec, P. Koźmiński, W. Popowicz, G. Krężel, A. Ożyhar, A. Greb-Markiewicz, B. |
author_facet | Kolonko-Adamska, M. Zawadzka-Kazimierczuk, A. Bartosińska-Marzec, P. Koźmiński, W. Popowicz, G. Krężel, A. Ożyhar, A. Greb-Markiewicz, B. |
author_sort | Kolonko-Adamska, M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Methoprene-tolerant (Met) and germ cell-expressed (Gce) proteins were shown to be juvenile hormone (JH) receptors of Drosophila melanogaster with partially redundant functions. We raised the question of where the functional differentiation of paralogs comes from. Therefore, we tested Met and Gce interaction patterns with selected partners. In this study, we showed the ability of Gce and its C-terminus (GceC) to interact with 14-3-3 in the absence of JH. In contrast, Met or Met C-terminus (MetC) interactions with 14-3-3 were not observed. We also performed a detailed structural analysis of Met/Gce interactions with the nuclear receptor fushi tarazu factor-1 (Ftz-F1) ligand-binding domain. We showed that GceC comprising an Ftz-F1-binding site and full-length protein interacts with Ftz-F1. In contrast to Gce, only MetC (not full-length Met) can interact with Ftz-F1 in the absence of JH. We propose that the described differences result from the distinct tertiary structure and accessibility of binding sites in the full-length Met/Gce. Moreover, we hypothesize that each interacting partner can force disordered MetC and GceC to change the structure in a partner-specific manner. The observed interactions seem to determine the subcellular localization of Met/Gce by forcing their translocation between the nucleus and the cytoplasm, which may affect the activity of the proteins. The presented differences between Met and Gce can be crucial for their functional differentiation during D. melanogaster development and indicate Gce as a more universal and more active paralog. It is consistent with the theory indicating gce as an ancestor gene. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10465699 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104656992023-08-31 Interaction patterns of methoprene-tolerant and germ cell-expressed Drosophila JH receptors suggest significant differences in their functioning Kolonko-Adamska, M. Zawadzka-Kazimierczuk, A. Bartosińska-Marzec, P. Koźmiński, W. Popowicz, G. Krężel, A. Ożyhar, A. Greb-Markiewicz, B. Front Mol Biosci Molecular Biosciences Methoprene-tolerant (Met) and germ cell-expressed (Gce) proteins were shown to be juvenile hormone (JH) receptors of Drosophila melanogaster with partially redundant functions. We raised the question of where the functional differentiation of paralogs comes from. Therefore, we tested Met and Gce interaction patterns with selected partners. In this study, we showed the ability of Gce and its C-terminus (GceC) to interact with 14-3-3 in the absence of JH. In contrast, Met or Met C-terminus (MetC) interactions with 14-3-3 were not observed. We also performed a detailed structural analysis of Met/Gce interactions with the nuclear receptor fushi tarazu factor-1 (Ftz-F1) ligand-binding domain. We showed that GceC comprising an Ftz-F1-binding site and full-length protein interacts with Ftz-F1. In contrast to Gce, only MetC (not full-length Met) can interact with Ftz-F1 in the absence of JH. We propose that the described differences result from the distinct tertiary structure and accessibility of binding sites in the full-length Met/Gce. Moreover, we hypothesize that each interacting partner can force disordered MetC and GceC to change the structure in a partner-specific manner. The observed interactions seem to determine the subcellular localization of Met/Gce by forcing their translocation between the nucleus and the cytoplasm, which may affect the activity of the proteins. The presented differences between Met and Gce can be crucial for their functional differentiation during D. melanogaster development and indicate Gce as a more universal and more active paralog. It is consistent with the theory indicating gce as an ancestor gene. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC10465699/ /pubmed/37654797 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2023.1215550 Text en Copyright © 2023 Kolonko-Adamska, Zawadzka-Kazimierczuk, Bartosińska-Marzec, Koźmiński, Popowicz, Krężel, Ożyhar and Greb-Markiewicz. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Molecular Biosciences Kolonko-Adamska, M. Zawadzka-Kazimierczuk, A. Bartosińska-Marzec, P. Koźmiński, W. Popowicz, G. Krężel, A. Ożyhar, A. Greb-Markiewicz, B. Interaction patterns of methoprene-tolerant and germ cell-expressed Drosophila JH receptors suggest significant differences in their functioning |
title | Interaction patterns of methoprene-tolerant and germ cell-expressed Drosophila JH receptors suggest significant differences in their functioning |
title_full | Interaction patterns of methoprene-tolerant and germ cell-expressed Drosophila JH receptors suggest significant differences in their functioning |
title_fullStr | Interaction patterns of methoprene-tolerant and germ cell-expressed Drosophila JH receptors suggest significant differences in their functioning |
title_full_unstemmed | Interaction patterns of methoprene-tolerant and germ cell-expressed Drosophila JH receptors suggest significant differences in their functioning |
title_short | Interaction patterns of methoprene-tolerant and germ cell-expressed Drosophila JH receptors suggest significant differences in their functioning |
title_sort | interaction patterns of methoprene-tolerant and germ cell-expressed drosophila jh receptors suggest significant differences in their functioning |
topic | Molecular Biosciences |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10465699/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37654797 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmolb.2023.1215550 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kolonkoadamskam interactionpatternsofmethoprenetolerantandgermcellexpresseddrosophilajhreceptorssuggestsignificantdifferencesintheirfunctioning AT zawadzkakazimierczuka interactionpatternsofmethoprenetolerantandgermcellexpresseddrosophilajhreceptorssuggestsignificantdifferencesintheirfunctioning AT bartosinskamarzecp interactionpatternsofmethoprenetolerantandgermcellexpresseddrosophilajhreceptorssuggestsignificantdifferencesintheirfunctioning AT kozminskiw interactionpatternsofmethoprenetolerantandgermcellexpresseddrosophilajhreceptorssuggestsignificantdifferencesintheirfunctioning AT popowiczg interactionpatternsofmethoprenetolerantandgermcellexpresseddrosophilajhreceptorssuggestsignificantdifferencesintheirfunctioning AT krezela interactionpatternsofmethoprenetolerantandgermcellexpresseddrosophilajhreceptorssuggestsignificantdifferencesintheirfunctioning AT ozyhara interactionpatternsofmethoprenetolerantandgermcellexpresseddrosophilajhreceptorssuggestsignificantdifferencesintheirfunctioning AT grebmarkiewiczb interactionpatternsofmethoprenetolerantandgermcellexpresseddrosophilajhreceptorssuggestsignificantdifferencesintheirfunctioning |