Cargando…

Evaluating synthetic computed tomography images for adaptive radiotherapy decision making in head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) decision-making benefits from dosimetric information to supplement image inspection when assessing the significance of anatomical changes. This study evaluated a dosimetry-based clinical decision workflow for ART utilizing deformable registration o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Allen, Caitlin, Yeo, Adam U., Hardcastle, Nicholas, Franich, Rick D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10465931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37655123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2023.100478
_version_ 1785098773737766912
author Allen, Caitlin
Yeo, Adam U.
Hardcastle, Nicholas
Franich, Rick D.
author_facet Allen, Caitlin
Yeo, Adam U.
Hardcastle, Nicholas
Franich, Rick D.
author_sort Allen, Caitlin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) decision-making benefits from dosimetric information to supplement image inspection when assessing the significance of anatomical changes. This study evaluated a dosimetry-based clinical decision workflow for ART utilizing deformable registration of the original planning computed tomography (CT) image to the daily Cone Beam CT (CBCT) to replace the need for a replan CT for dose estimation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used 12 retrospective Head & Neck patient cases having a ground truth – a replan CT (rCT) in response to anatomical changes apparent in the daily CBCT – to evaluate the accuracy of dosimetric assessment conducted on synthetic CTs (sCT) generated by deforming the original planning CT Hounsfield Units to the daily CBCT anatomy. The original plan was applied to the sCT and dosimetric accuracy of the sCT was assessed by analyzing plan objectives for targets and organs-at-risk compared to calculations on the ground-truth rCT. Three commercial DIR algorithms were compared. RESULTS: For the best-performing algorithms, the majority of dose metrics calculated on the sCTs differed by less than 4 Gy (5.7% of 70 Gy prescription dose). An uncertainty of ±2.5 Gy (3.6% of 70 Gy prescription) is recommended as a conservative tolerance when evaluating dose metrics on sCTs for head and neck. CONCLUSIONS: Synthetic CTs present a valuable addition to the adaptive radiotherapy workflow, and synthetic CT dose estimates can be effectively used in addition to the current practice of visually inspecting the overlay of the planning CT and CBCT to assess the significance of anatomical change.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10465931
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104659312023-08-31 Evaluating synthetic computed tomography images for adaptive radiotherapy decision making in head and neck cancer Allen, Caitlin Yeo, Adam U. Hardcastle, Nicholas Franich, Rick D. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol Original Research Article BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) decision-making benefits from dosimetric information to supplement image inspection when assessing the significance of anatomical changes. This study evaluated a dosimetry-based clinical decision workflow for ART utilizing deformable registration of the original planning computed tomography (CT) image to the daily Cone Beam CT (CBCT) to replace the need for a replan CT for dose estimation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We used 12 retrospective Head & Neck patient cases having a ground truth – a replan CT (rCT) in response to anatomical changes apparent in the daily CBCT – to evaluate the accuracy of dosimetric assessment conducted on synthetic CTs (sCT) generated by deforming the original planning CT Hounsfield Units to the daily CBCT anatomy. The original plan was applied to the sCT and dosimetric accuracy of the sCT was assessed by analyzing plan objectives for targets and organs-at-risk compared to calculations on the ground-truth rCT. Three commercial DIR algorithms were compared. RESULTS: For the best-performing algorithms, the majority of dose metrics calculated on the sCTs differed by less than 4 Gy (5.7% of 70 Gy prescription dose). An uncertainty of ±2.5 Gy (3.6% of 70 Gy prescription) is recommended as a conservative tolerance when evaluating dose metrics on sCTs for head and neck. CONCLUSIONS: Synthetic CTs present a valuable addition to the adaptive radiotherapy workflow, and synthetic CT dose estimates can be effectively used in addition to the current practice of visually inspecting the overlay of the planning CT and CBCT to assess the significance of anatomical change. Elsevier 2023-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC10465931/ /pubmed/37655123 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2023.100478 Text en © 2023 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Allen, Caitlin
Yeo, Adam U.
Hardcastle, Nicholas
Franich, Rick D.
Evaluating synthetic computed tomography images for adaptive radiotherapy decision making in head and neck cancer
title Evaluating synthetic computed tomography images for adaptive radiotherapy decision making in head and neck cancer
title_full Evaluating synthetic computed tomography images for adaptive radiotherapy decision making in head and neck cancer
title_fullStr Evaluating synthetic computed tomography images for adaptive radiotherapy decision making in head and neck cancer
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating synthetic computed tomography images for adaptive radiotherapy decision making in head and neck cancer
title_short Evaluating synthetic computed tomography images for adaptive radiotherapy decision making in head and neck cancer
title_sort evaluating synthetic computed tomography images for adaptive radiotherapy decision making in head and neck cancer
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10465931/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37655123
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.phro.2023.100478
work_keys_str_mv AT allencaitlin evaluatingsyntheticcomputedtomographyimagesforadaptiveradiotherapydecisionmakinginheadandneckcancer
AT yeoadamu evaluatingsyntheticcomputedtomographyimagesforadaptiveradiotherapydecisionmakinginheadandneckcancer
AT hardcastlenicholas evaluatingsyntheticcomputedtomographyimagesforadaptiveradiotherapydecisionmakinginheadandneckcancer
AT franichrickd evaluatingsyntheticcomputedtomographyimagesforadaptiveradiotherapydecisionmakinginheadandneckcancer