Cargando…

A rapid review of community engagement and informed consent processes for adaptive platform trials and alternative design trials for public health emergencies

Background : Public Health Emergencies (PHE) demand expeditious research responses to evaluate new or repurposed therapies and prevention strategies. Alternative Design Trials (ADTs) and Adaptive Platform Trials (APTs) have enabled efficient large-scale testing of biomedical interventions during rec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Davies, Alun, Ormel, Ilja, Bernier, Alexe, Harriss, Eli, Mumba, Noni, Gobat, Nina, Schwartz, Lisa, Cheah, Phaik Yeong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: F1000 Research Limited 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10465998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37654739
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.19318.1
_version_ 1785098787956457472
author Davies, Alun
Ormel, Ilja
Bernier, Alexe
Harriss, Eli
Mumba, Noni
Gobat, Nina
Schwartz, Lisa
Cheah, Phaik Yeong
author_facet Davies, Alun
Ormel, Ilja
Bernier, Alexe
Harriss, Eli
Mumba, Noni
Gobat, Nina
Schwartz, Lisa
Cheah, Phaik Yeong
author_sort Davies, Alun
collection PubMed
description Background : Public Health Emergencies (PHE) demand expeditious research responses to evaluate new or repurposed therapies and prevention strategies. Alternative Design Trials (ADTs) and Adaptive Platform Trials (APTs) have enabled efficient large-scale testing of biomedical interventions during recent PHEs. Design features of these trials may have implications for engagement and/or informed consent processes. We aimed to rapidly review evidence on engagement and informed consent for ADTs and APTs during PHE to consider what (if any) recommendations can inform practice. Method : In 2022, we searched 8 prominent databases for relevant peer reviewed publications and guidelines for ADTs/APTs in PHE contexts. Articles were selected based on pre-identified inclusion and exclusion criteria. We reviewed protocols and informed consent documents for a sample of large platform trials and consulted with key informants from ADTs/APT trial teams. Data were extracted and summarised using narrative synthesis. Results : Of the 49 articles included, 10 were guidance documents, 14 discussed engagement, 10 discussed informed consent, and 15 discussed both. Included articles addressed ADTs delivered during the West African Ebola epidemic and APTs delivered during COVID-19. PHE clinical research guidance documents highlight the value of ADTs/APTs and the importance of community engagement, but do not provide practice-specific guidance for engagement or informed consent. Engagement and consent practice for ADTs conducted during the West African Ebola epidemic have been well-documented. For COVID-19, engagement and consent practice was described for APTs primarily delivered in high income countries with well-developed health service structures. A key consideration is strong communication of the complexity of trial design in clear, accessible ways. Conclusion: We highlight key considerations for best practice in community engagement and informed consent relevant to ADTs and APTs for PHEs which may helpfully be included in future guidance. Protocol: The review protocol is published online at Prospero on 15/06/2022: registration number CRD42022334170.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10465998
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher F1000 Research Limited
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104659982023-08-31 A rapid review of community engagement and informed consent processes for adaptive platform trials and alternative design trials for public health emergencies Davies, Alun Ormel, Ilja Bernier, Alexe Harriss, Eli Mumba, Noni Gobat, Nina Schwartz, Lisa Cheah, Phaik Yeong Wellcome Open Res Systematic Review Background : Public Health Emergencies (PHE) demand expeditious research responses to evaluate new or repurposed therapies and prevention strategies. Alternative Design Trials (ADTs) and Adaptive Platform Trials (APTs) have enabled efficient large-scale testing of biomedical interventions during recent PHEs. Design features of these trials may have implications for engagement and/or informed consent processes. We aimed to rapidly review evidence on engagement and informed consent for ADTs and APTs during PHE to consider what (if any) recommendations can inform practice. Method : In 2022, we searched 8 prominent databases for relevant peer reviewed publications and guidelines for ADTs/APTs in PHE contexts. Articles were selected based on pre-identified inclusion and exclusion criteria. We reviewed protocols and informed consent documents for a sample of large platform trials and consulted with key informants from ADTs/APT trial teams. Data were extracted and summarised using narrative synthesis. Results : Of the 49 articles included, 10 were guidance documents, 14 discussed engagement, 10 discussed informed consent, and 15 discussed both. Included articles addressed ADTs delivered during the West African Ebola epidemic and APTs delivered during COVID-19. PHE clinical research guidance documents highlight the value of ADTs/APTs and the importance of community engagement, but do not provide practice-specific guidance for engagement or informed consent. Engagement and consent practice for ADTs conducted during the West African Ebola epidemic have been well-documented. For COVID-19, engagement and consent practice was described for APTs primarily delivered in high income countries with well-developed health service structures. A key consideration is strong communication of the complexity of trial design in clear, accessible ways. Conclusion: We highlight key considerations for best practice in community engagement and informed consent relevant to ADTs and APTs for PHEs which may helpfully be included in future guidance. Protocol: The review protocol is published online at Prospero on 15/06/2022: registration number CRD42022334170. F1000 Research Limited 2023-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC10465998/ /pubmed/37654739 http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.19318.1 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Davies A et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Licence, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Davies, Alun
Ormel, Ilja
Bernier, Alexe
Harriss, Eli
Mumba, Noni
Gobat, Nina
Schwartz, Lisa
Cheah, Phaik Yeong
A rapid review of community engagement and informed consent processes for adaptive platform trials and alternative design trials for public health emergencies
title A rapid review of community engagement and informed consent processes for adaptive platform trials and alternative design trials for public health emergencies
title_full A rapid review of community engagement and informed consent processes for adaptive platform trials and alternative design trials for public health emergencies
title_fullStr A rapid review of community engagement and informed consent processes for adaptive platform trials and alternative design trials for public health emergencies
title_full_unstemmed A rapid review of community engagement and informed consent processes for adaptive platform trials and alternative design trials for public health emergencies
title_short A rapid review of community engagement and informed consent processes for adaptive platform trials and alternative design trials for public health emergencies
title_sort rapid review of community engagement and informed consent processes for adaptive platform trials and alternative design trials for public health emergencies
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10465998/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37654739
http://dx.doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.19318.1
work_keys_str_mv AT daviesalun arapidreviewofcommunityengagementandinformedconsentprocessesforadaptiveplatformtrialsandalternativedesigntrialsforpublichealthemergencies
AT ormelilja arapidreviewofcommunityengagementandinformedconsentprocessesforadaptiveplatformtrialsandalternativedesigntrialsforpublichealthemergencies
AT bernieralexe arapidreviewofcommunityengagementandinformedconsentprocessesforadaptiveplatformtrialsandalternativedesigntrialsforpublichealthemergencies
AT harrisseli arapidreviewofcommunityengagementandinformedconsentprocessesforadaptiveplatformtrialsandalternativedesigntrialsforpublichealthemergencies
AT mumbanoni arapidreviewofcommunityengagementandinformedconsentprocessesforadaptiveplatformtrialsandalternativedesigntrialsforpublichealthemergencies
AT gobatnina arapidreviewofcommunityengagementandinformedconsentprocessesforadaptiveplatformtrialsandalternativedesigntrialsforpublichealthemergencies
AT schwartzlisa arapidreviewofcommunityengagementandinformedconsentprocessesforadaptiveplatformtrialsandalternativedesigntrialsforpublichealthemergencies
AT cheahphaikyeong arapidreviewofcommunityengagementandinformedconsentprocessesforadaptiveplatformtrialsandalternativedesigntrialsforpublichealthemergencies
AT daviesalun rapidreviewofcommunityengagementandinformedconsentprocessesforadaptiveplatformtrialsandalternativedesigntrialsforpublichealthemergencies
AT ormelilja rapidreviewofcommunityengagementandinformedconsentprocessesforadaptiveplatformtrialsandalternativedesigntrialsforpublichealthemergencies
AT bernieralexe rapidreviewofcommunityengagementandinformedconsentprocessesforadaptiveplatformtrialsandalternativedesigntrialsforpublichealthemergencies
AT harrisseli rapidreviewofcommunityengagementandinformedconsentprocessesforadaptiveplatformtrialsandalternativedesigntrialsforpublichealthemergencies
AT mumbanoni rapidreviewofcommunityengagementandinformedconsentprocessesforadaptiveplatformtrialsandalternativedesigntrialsforpublichealthemergencies
AT gobatnina rapidreviewofcommunityengagementandinformedconsentprocessesforadaptiveplatformtrialsandalternativedesigntrialsforpublichealthemergencies
AT schwartzlisa rapidreviewofcommunityengagementandinformedconsentprocessesforadaptiveplatformtrialsandalternativedesigntrialsforpublichealthemergencies
AT cheahphaikyeong rapidreviewofcommunityengagementandinformedconsentprocessesforadaptiveplatformtrialsandalternativedesigntrialsforpublichealthemergencies