Cargando…

Comparing of two dimensional and three dimensional fully convolutional networks for radiotherapy dose prediction in left-sided breast cancer

Fully convolutional networks were developed for predicting optimal dose distributions for patients with left-sided breast cancer and compared the prediction accuracy between two-dimensional and three-dimensional networks. Sixty cases treated with volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy were analyzed....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bai, Xue, Liu, Ze, Zhang, Jie, Wang, Shengye, Hou, Qing, Shan, Guoping, Chen, Ming, Wang, Binbing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10466025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34519556
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00368504211038162
_version_ 1785098794337042432
author Bai, Xue
Liu, Ze
Zhang, Jie
Wang, Shengye
Hou, Qing
Shan, Guoping
Chen, Ming
Wang, Binbing
author_facet Bai, Xue
Liu, Ze
Zhang, Jie
Wang, Shengye
Hou, Qing
Shan, Guoping
Chen, Ming
Wang, Binbing
author_sort Bai, Xue
collection PubMed
description Fully convolutional networks were developed for predicting optimal dose distributions for patients with left-sided breast cancer and compared the prediction accuracy between two-dimensional and three-dimensional networks. Sixty cases treated with volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy were analyzed. Among them, 50 cases were randomly chosen to conform the training set, and the remaining 10 were to construct the test set. Two U-Net fully convolutional networks predicted the dose distributions, with two-dimensional and three-dimensional convolution kernels, respectively. Computed tomography images, delineated regions of interest, or their combination were considered as input data. The accuracy of predicted results was evaluated against the clinical dose. Most types of input data retrieved a similar dose to the ground truth for organs at risk (p > 0.05). Overall, the two-dimensional model had higher performance than the three-dimensional model (p < 0.05). Moreover, the two-dimensional region of interest input provided the best prediction results regarding the planning target volume mean percentage difference (2.40 ± 0.18%), heart mean percentage difference (4.28 ± 2.02%), and the gamma index at 80% of the prescription dose are with tolerances of 3 mm and 3% (0.85 ± 0.03), whereas the two-dimensional combined input provided the best prediction regarding ipsilateral lung mean percentage difference (4.16 ± 1.48%), lung mean percentage difference (2.41 ± 0.95%), spinal cord mean percentage difference (0.67 ± 0.40%), and 80% Dice similarity coefficient (0.94 ± 0.01). Statistically, the two-dimensional combined inputs achieved higher prediction accuracy regarding 80% Dice similarity coefficient than the two-dimensional region of interest input (0.94 ± 0.01 vs 0.92 ± 0.01, p < 0.05). The two-dimensional data model retrieves higher performance than its three-dimensional counterpart for dose prediction, especially when using region of interest and combined inputs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10466025
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104660252023-08-31 Comparing of two dimensional and three dimensional fully convolutional networks for radiotherapy dose prediction in left-sided breast cancer Bai, Xue Liu, Ze Zhang, Jie Wang, Shengye Hou, Qing Shan, Guoping Chen, Ming Wang, Binbing Sci Prog Original Manuscript Fully convolutional networks were developed for predicting optimal dose distributions for patients with left-sided breast cancer and compared the prediction accuracy between two-dimensional and three-dimensional networks. Sixty cases treated with volumetric modulated arc radiotherapy were analyzed. Among them, 50 cases were randomly chosen to conform the training set, and the remaining 10 were to construct the test set. Two U-Net fully convolutional networks predicted the dose distributions, with two-dimensional and three-dimensional convolution kernels, respectively. Computed tomography images, delineated regions of interest, or their combination were considered as input data. The accuracy of predicted results was evaluated against the clinical dose. Most types of input data retrieved a similar dose to the ground truth for organs at risk (p > 0.05). Overall, the two-dimensional model had higher performance than the three-dimensional model (p < 0.05). Moreover, the two-dimensional region of interest input provided the best prediction results regarding the planning target volume mean percentage difference (2.40 ± 0.18%), heart mean percentage difference (4.28 ± 2.02%), and the gamma index at 80% of the prescription dose are with tolerances of 3 mm and 3% (0.85 ± 0.03), whereas the two-dimensional combined input provided the best prediction regarding ipsilateral lung mean percentage difference (4.16 ± 1.48%), lung mean percentage difference (2.41 ± 0.95%), spinal cord mean percentage difference (0.67 ± 0.40%), and 80% Dice similarity coefficient (0.94 ± 0.01). Statistically, the two-dimensional combined inputs achieved higher prediction accuracy regarding 80% Dice similarity coefficient than the two-dimensional region of interest input (0.94 ± 0.01 vs 0.92 ± 0.01, p < 0.05). The two-dimensional data model retrieves higher performance than its three-dimensional counterpart for dose prediction, especially when using region of interest and combined inputs. SAGE Publications 2021-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC10466025/ /pubmed/34519556 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00368504211038162 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Manuscript
Bai, Xue
Liu, Ze
Zhang, Jie
Wang, Shengye
Hou, Qing
Shan, Guoping
Chen, Ming
Wang, Binbing
Comparing of two dimensional and three dimensional fully convolutional networks for radiotherapy dose prediction in left-sided breast cancer
title Comparing of two dimensional and three dimensional fully convolutional networks for radiotherapy dose prediction in left-sided breast cancer
title_full Comparing of two dimensional and three dimensional fully convolutional networks for radiotherapy dose prediction in left-sided breast cancer
title_fullStr Comparing of two dimensional and three dimensional fully convolutional networks for radiotherapy dose prediction in left-sided breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed Comparing of two dimensional and three dimensional fully convolutional networks for radiotherapy dose prediction in left-sided breast cancer
title_short Comparing of two dimensional and three dimensional fully convolutional networks for radiotherapy dose prediction in left-sided breast cancer
title_sort comparing of two dimensional and three dimensional fully convolutional networks for radiotherapy dose prediction in left-sided breast cancer
topic Original Manuscript
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10466025/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34519556
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00368504211038162
work_keys_str_mv AT baixue comparingoftwodimensionalandthreedimensionalfullyconvolutionalnetworksforradiotherapydosepredictioninleftsidedbreastcancer
AT liuze comparingoftwodimensionalandthreedimensionalfullyconvolutionalnetworksforradiotherapydosepredictioninleftsidedbreastcancer
AT zhangjie comparingoftwodimensionalandthreedimensionalfullyconvolutionalnetworksforradiotherapydosepredictioninleftsidedbreastcancer
AT wangshengye comparingoftwodimensionalandthreedimensionalfullyconvolutionalnetworksforradiotherapydosepredictioninleftsidedbreastcancer
AT houqing comparingoftwodimensionalandthreedimensionalfullyconvolutionalnetworksforradiotherapydosepredictioninleftsidedbreastcancer
AT shanguoping comparingoftwodimensionalandthreedimensionalfullyconvolutionalnetworksforradiotherapydosepredictioninleftsidedbreastcancer
AT chenming comparingoftwodimensionalandthreedimensionalfullyconvolutionalnetworksforradiotherapydosepredictioninleftsidedbreastcancer
AT wangbinbing comparingoftwodimensionalandthreedimensionalfullyconvolutionalnetworksforradiotherapydosepredictioninleftsidedbreastcancer