Cargando…
The Effects of Fixed Versus Removable Orthodontic Retainers on Stability and Periodontal Health: 4-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial
INTRODUCTION: Long-term or even indefinite retention is routinely prescribed after orthodontic treatment as a preventive safeguard against post-treatment changes induced by tooth movement, physiological healing, and the aging process. Though both fixed and removable versions of retainers may be equa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10466669/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37654327 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_587_22 |
_version_ | 1785098938105200640 |
---|---|
author | Hotchandani, Kamal Dhruvkumar Thangadurai, Janarthan Parate, Akhilesh Singh Nixon, Jeff Zacharia Kamble, Ranjit H. Meghalapriya, P |
author_facet | Hotchandani, Kamal Dhruvkumar Thangadurai, Janarthan Parate, Akhilesh Singh Nixon, Jeff Zacharia Kamble, Ranjit H. Meghalapriya, P |
author_sort | Hotchandani, Kamal Dhruvkumar |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Long-term or even indefinite retention is routinely prescribed after orthodontic treatment as a preventive safeguard against post-treatment changes induced by tooth movement, physiological healing, and the aging process. Though both fixed and removable versions of retainers may be equally effective in terms of results, sufficient research to support this assumption is missing at the moment. OBJECTIVES: Long-term effects of fixed and removable retention on the periodontium, and the compliance level when used for an extended period of time. METHODS: For 4 years participants were given a supply of canine-to-canine retainers and vacuum-formed canine-to-canine retainers. The inter-canine, as well as inter-molar widths, the length, and the extraction space opening of the mandibular anterior portion, were measured. Gingival inflammation, calculus, and plaque were observed, as well as the attachment of clinical and the case of bleeding during probing. 42 members had returned in the follow-up period, with 21 from each of the two groups. Measurements of the modified gingival index and plaque scoring were performed on the 10 intra-oral photographs that were taken at 4-week intervals in this study to investigate the intra-examiner reliability. RESULTS: After controlling for confounding variables, there was a 1.64 mm (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.30, 2.98 mm) median between-groups difference among patients who utilized vacuum-formed retainers (VFRs). The treatment groups did not vary in inter-canine and intermolar widths (P = 0.52; 95% CI, −1.07, 1.05), arch length (P = 0.99; 95% CI, −1.15, 1.14), or opening of extraction spaces (P = 0.84). CONCLUSION: A long-term study demonstrates that fixed retention can preserve the alignment of the mandibular anterior over time for the first time. Gingival discomfort and higher plaque scores were reported in both types of retainers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10466669 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104666692023-08-31 The Effects of Fixed Versus Removable Orthodontic Retainers on Stability and Periodontal Health: 4-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial Hotchandani, Kamal Dhruvkumar Thangadurai, Janarthan Parate, Akhilesh Singh Nixon, Jeff Zacharia Kamble, Ranjit H. Meghalapriya, P J Pharm Bioallied Sci Original Article INTRODUCTION: Long-term or even indefinite retention is routinely prescribed after orthodontic treatment as a preventive safeguard against post-treatment changes induced by tooth movement, physiological healing, and the aging process. Though both fixed and removable versions of retainers may be equally effective in terms of results, sufficient research to support this assumption is missing at the moment. OBJECTIVES: Long-term effects of fixed and removable retention on the periodontium, and the compliance level when used for an extended period of time. METHODS: For 4 years participants were given a supply of canine-to-canine retainers and vacuum-formed canine-to-canine retainers. The inter-canine, as well as inter-molar widths, the length, and the extraction space opening of the mandibular anterior portion, were measured. Gingival inflammation, calculus, and plaque were observed, as well as the attachment of clinical and the case of bleeding during probing. 42 members had returned in the follow-up period, with 21 from each of the two groups. Measurements of the modified gingival index and plaque scoring were performed on the 10 intra-oral photographs that were taken at 4-week intervals in this study to investigate the intra-examiner reliability. RESULTS: After controlling for confounding variables, there was a 1.64 mm (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.30, 2.98 mm) median between-groups difference among patients who utilized vacuum-formed retainers (VFRs). The treatment groups did not vary in inter-canine and intermolar widths (P = 0.52; 95% CI, −1.07, 1.05), arch length (P = 0.99; 95% CI, −1.15, 1.14), or opening of extraction spaces (P = 0.84). CONCLUSION: A long-term study demonstrates that fixed retention can preserve the alignment of the mandibular anterior over time for the first time. Gingival discomfort and higher plaque scores were reported in both types of retainers. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2023-07 2023-07-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10466669/ /pubmed/37654327 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_587_22 Text en Copyright: © 2023 Journal of Pharmacy and Bioallied Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Hotchandani, Kamal Dhruvkumar Thangadurai, Janarthan Parate, Akhilesh Singh Nixon, Jeff Zacharia Kamble, Ranjit H. Meghalapriya, P The Effects of Fixed Versus Removable Orthodontic Retainers on Stability and Periodontal Health: 4-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial |
title | The Effects of Fixed Versus Removable Orthodontic Retainers on Stability and Periodontal Health: 4-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full | The Effects of Fixed Versus Removable Orthodontic Retainers on Stability and Periodontal Health: 4-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | The Effects of Fixed Versus Removable Orthodontic Retainers on Stability and Periodontal Health: 4-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The Effects of Fixed Versus Removable Orthodontic Retainers on Stability and Periodontal Health: 4-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_short | The Effects of Fixed Versus Removable Orthodontic Retainers on Stability and Periodontal Health: 4-Year Follow-Up of a Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_sort | effects of fixed versus removable orthodontic retainers on stability and periodontal health: 4-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10466669/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37654327 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_587_22 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hotchandanikamaldhruvkumar theeffectsoffixedversusremovableorthodonticretainersonstabilityandperiodontalhealth4yearfollowupofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT thangaduraijanarthan theeffectsoffixedversusremovableorthodonticretainersonstabilityandperiodontalhealth4yearfollowupofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT parateakhileshsingh theeffectsoffixedversusremovableorthodonticretainersonstabilityandperiodontalhealth4yearfollowupofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT nixonjeffzacharia theeffectsoffixedversusremovableorthodonticretainersonstabilityandperiodontalhealth4yearfollowupofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kambleranjith theeffectsoffixedversusremovableorthodonticretainersonstabilityandperiodontalhealth4yearfollowupofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT meghalapriyap theeffectsoffixedversusremovableorthodonticretainersonstabilityandperiodontalhealth4yearfollowupofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT hotchandanikamaldhruvkumar effectsoffixedversusremovableorthodonticretainersonstabilityandperiodontalhealth4yearfollowupofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT thangaduraijanarthan effectsoffixedversusremovableorthodonticretainersonstabilityandperiodontalhealth4yearfollowupofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT parateakhileshsingh effectsoffixedversusremovableorthodonticretainersonstabilityandperiodontalhealth4yearfollowupofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT nixonjeffzacharia effectsoffixedversusremovableorthodonticretainersonstabilityandperiodontalhealth4yearfollowupofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kambleranjith effectsoffixedversusremovableorthodonticretainersonstabilityandperiodontalhealth4yearfollowupofarandomizedcontrolledtrial AT meghalapriyap effectsoffixedversusremovableorthodonticretainersonstabilityandperiodontalhealth4yearfollowupofarandomizedcontrolledtrial |