Cargando…
Efficacy of the spatial repellent product Mosquito Shield™ against wild pyrethroid-resistant Anopheles arabiensis in south-eastern Tanzania
BACKGROUND: Spatial repellents that create airborne concentrations of an active ingredient (AI) within a space offer a scalable solution to further reduce transmission of malaria, by disrupting mosquito behaviours in ways that ultimately lead to reduced human-vector contact. Passive emanator spatial...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10466708/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37649032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-023-04674-4 |
_version_ | 1785098947888414720 |
---|---|
author | Swai, Johnson Kyeba Soto, Alina Celest Ntabaliba, Watson Samuel Kibondo, Ummi Abdul Ngonyani, Hassan Ahamad Mseka, Antony Pius Ortiz, Anthony Chura, Madeleine Rose Mascari, Thomas Michael Moore, Sarah Jane |
author_facet | Swai, Johnson Kyeba Soto, Alina Celest Ntabaliba, Watson Samuel Kibondo, Ummi Abdul Ngonyani, Hassan Ahamad Mseka, Antony Pius Ortiz, Anthony Chura, Madeleine Rose Mascari, Thomas Michael Moore, Sarah Jane |
author_sort | Swai, Johnson Kyeba |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Spatial repellents that create airborne concentrations of an active ingredient (AI) within a space offer a scalable solution to further reduce transmission of malaria, by disrupting mosquito behaviours in ways that ultimately lead to reduced human-vector contact. Passive emanator spatial repellents can protect multiple people within the treated space and can last for multiple weeks without the need for daily user touchpoints, making them less intrusive interventions. They may be particularly advantageous in certain use cases where implementation of core tools may be constrained, such as in humanitarian emergencies and among mobile at-risk populations. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of Mosquito Shield™ deployed in experimental huts against wild, free-flying, pyrethroid-resistant Anopheles arabiensis mosquitoes in Tanzania over 1 month. METHODS: The efficacy of Mosquito Shield™ transfluthrin spatial repellent in reducing mosquito lands and blood-feeding was evaluated using 24 huts: sixteen huts were allocated to Human Landing Catch (HLC) collections and eight huts to estimating blood-feeding. In both experiments, half of the huts received no intervention (control) while the remaining received the intervention randomly allocated to huts and remained fixed for the study duration. Outcomes measured were mosquito landings, blood-fed, resting and dead mosquitoes. Data were analysed by multilevel mixed effects regression with appropriate dispersion and link function accounting for volunteer, hut and day. RESULTS: Landing inhibition was estimated to be 70% (57–78%) [IRR 0.30 (95% CI 0.22–0.43); p < 0.0001] and blood-feeding inhibition was estimated to be 69% (56–79%) [IRR 0.31 (95% CI 0.21–0.44; p < 0.0001] There was no difference in the protective efficacy estimates of landing and blood-feeding inhibition [IRR 0.98 (95% CI 0.53–1.82; p = 0.958]. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that Mosquito Shield™ was efficacious against a wild pyrethroid-resistant strain of An. arabiensis mosquitoes in Tanzania for up to 1 month and could be used as a complementary or stand-alone tool where gaps in protection offered by core malaria vector control tools exist. HLC is a suitable technique for estimating bite reductions conferred by spatial repellents especially where direct blood-feeding measurements are not practical or are ethically limited. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12936-023-04674-4. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10466708 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104667082023-08-31 Efficacy of the spatial repellent product Mosquito Shield™ against wild pyrethroid-resistant Anopheles arabiensis in south-eastern Tanzania Swai, Johnson Kyeba Soto, Alina Celest Ntabaliba, Watson Samuel Kibondo, Ummi Abdul Ngonyani, Hassan Ahamad Mseka, Antony Pius Ortiz, Anthony Chura, Madeleine Rose Mascari, Thomas Michael Moore, Sarah Jane Malar J Research BACKGROUND: Spatial repellents that create airborne concentrations of an active ingredient (AI) within a space offer a scalable solution to further reduce transmission of malaria, by disrupting mosquito behaviours in ways that ultimately lead to reduced human-vector contact. Passive emanator spatial repellents can protect multiple people within the treated space and can last for multiple weeks without the need for daily user touchpoints, making them less intrusive interventions. They may be particularly advantageous in certain use cases where implementation of core tools may be constrained, such as in humanitarian emergencies and among mobile at-risk populations. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of Mosquito Shield™ deployed in experimental huts against wild, free-flying, pyrethroid-resistant Anopheles arabiensis mosquitoes in Tanzania over 1 month. METHODS: The efficacy of Mosquito Shield™ transfluthrin spatial repellent in reducing mosquito lands and blood-feeding was evaluated using 24 huts: sixteen huts were allocated to Human Landing Catch (HLC) collections and eight huts to estimating blood-feeding. In both experiments, half of the huts received no intervention (control) while the remaining received the intervention randomly allocated to huts and remained fixed for the study duration. Outcomes measured were mosquito landings, blood-fed, resting and dead mosquitoes. Data were analysed by multilevel mixed effects regression with appropriate dispersion and link function accounting for volunteer, hut and day. RESULTS: Landing inhibition was estimated to be 70% (57–78%) [IRR 0.30 (95% CI 0.22–0.43); p < 0.0001] and blood-feeding inhibition was estimated to be 69% (56–79%) [IRR 0.31 (95% CI 0.21–0.44; p < 0.0001] There was no difference in the protective efficacy estimates of landing and blood-feeding inhibition [IRR 0.98 (95% CI 0.53–1.82; p = 0.958]. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that Mosquito Shield™ was efficacious against a wild pyrethroid-resistant strain of An. arabiensis mosquitoes in Tanzania for up to 1 month and could be used as a complementary or stand-alone tool where gaps in protection offered by core malaria vector control tools exist. HLC is a suitable technique for estimating bite reductions conferred by spatial repellents especially where direct blood-feeding measurements are not practical or are ethically limited. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12936-023-04674-4. BioMed Central 2023-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10466708/ /pubmed/37649032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-023-04674-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Swai, Johnson Kyeba Soto, Alina Celest Ntabaliba, Watson Samuel Kibondo, Ummi Abdul Ngonyani, Hassan Ahamad Mseka, Antony Pius Ortiz, Anthony Chura, Madeleine Rose Mascari, Thomas Michael Moore, Sarah Jane Efficacy of the spatial repellent product Mosquito Shield™ against wild pyrethroid-resistant Anopheles arabiensis in south-eastern Tanzania |
title | Efficacy of the spatial repellent product Mosquito Shield™ against wild pyrethroid-resistant Anopheles arabiensis in south-eastern Tanzania |
title_full | Efficacy of the spatial repellent product Mosquito Shield™ against wild pyrethroid-resistant Anopheles arabiensis in south-eastern Tanzania |
title_fullStr | Efficacy of the spatial repellent product Mosquito Shield™ against wild pyrethroid-resistant Anopheles arabiensis in south-eastern Tanzania |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy of the spatial repellent product Mosquito Shield™ against wild pyrethroid-resistant Anopheles arabiensis in south-eastern Tanzania |
title_short | Efficacy of the spatial repellent product Mosquito Shield™ against wild pyrethroid-resistant Anopheles arabiensis in south-eastern Tanzania |
title_sort | efficacy of the spatial repellent product mosquito shield™ against wild pyrethroid-resistant anopheles arabiensis in south-eastern tanzania |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10466708/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37649032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12936-023-04674-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT swaijohnsonkyeba efficacyofthespatialrepellentproductmosquitoshieldagainstwildpyrethroidresistantanophelesarabiensisinsoutheasterntanzania AT sotoalinacelest efficacyofthespatialrepellentproductmosquitoshieldagainstwildpyrethroidresistantanophelesarabiensisinsoutheasterntanzania AT ntabalibawatsonsamuel efficacyofthespatialrepellentproductmosquitoshieldagainstwildpyrethroidresistantanophelesarabiensisinsoutheasterntanzania AT kibondoummiabdul efficacyofthespatialrepellentproductmosquitoshieldagainstwildpyrethroidresistantanophelesarabiensisinsoutheasterntanzania AT ngonyanihassanahamad efficacyofthespatialrepellentproductmosquitoshieldagainstwildpyrethroidresistantanophelesarabiensisinsoutheasterntanzania AT msekaantonypius efficacyofthespatialrepellentproductmosquitoshieldagainstwildpyrethroidresistantanophelesarabiensisinsoutheasterntanzania AT ortizanthony efficacyofthespatialrepellentproductmosquitoshieldagainstwildpyrethroidresistantanophelesarabiensisinsoutheasterntanzania AT churamadeleinerose efficacyofthespatialrepellentproductmosquitoshieldagainstwildpyrethroidresistantanophelesarabiensisinsoutheasterntanzania AT mascarithomasmichael efficacyofthespatialrepellentproductmosquitoshieldagainstwildpyrethroidresistantanophelesarabiensisinsoutheasterntanzania AT mooresarahjane efficacyofthespatialrepellentproductmosquitoshieldagainstwildpyrethroidresistantanophelesarabiensisinsoutheasterntanzania |