Cargando…
Development and validation of a white cane use perceived advantages and disadvantages (WCPAD) questionnaire
BACKGROUND: The white cane is globally an important tool in orientation and mobility for blind and visually impaired people, but it is not often used. The goal of this study was to develop and validate the white cane use perceived advantages and disadvantages (WCPAD) questionnaire for detecting effe...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10466727/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37649118 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01282-4 |
_version_ | 1785098952531509248 |
---|---|
author | Rasouli Kahaki, Zeinab Karimi, Masoud Taherian, Masoud Simi, Roghayyeh |
author_facet | Rasouli Kahaki, Zeinab Karimi, Masoud Taherian, Masoud Simi, Roghayyeh |
author_sort | Rasouli Kahaki, Zeinab |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The white cane is globally an important tool in orientation and mobility for blind and visually impaired people, but it is not often used. The goal of this study was to develop and validate the white cane use perceived advantages and disadvantages (WCPAD) questionnaire for detecting effective factors in the use or non-use of canes. METHOD: The initial questionnaire items were extracted through semi-structured interviews with 21 blind or severely impaired vision individuals under two main themes, the perceived advantages, and disadvantages of using a white cane. Linguistic validity and writing evaluation with seven experts, face validity with 23 blind persons, content validity ratio (CVR), and content validity index (CVI) were used for assessment of validity. Internal and external reliability assessment was done using Cronbach’s alpha and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Explanatory factor analysis was conducted to identify the factors of the questionnaire; then, corrected item-total correlations, convergent and discriminant validity, and Confirmatory Factor Analyses (CFA) were done, and model fit indices were reported. A total of 320 blind and severe visual impaired individuals (138 males and 182 females) participated in the study. The final questionnaire contained 12 questions in perceived advantages and 21 in perceived disadvantages. RESULTS: Three factors (social participation, mobility, and culture) extracted for perceived advantages which explained 67.95% of the total variance, Cronbach-α for the three extracted factors was between 0.75 and 0.91. Four factors (social, safety, ergonomics, and family) for perceived disadvantages were extracted which explained 50.98% of the total variance. Cronbach-α for the four extracted factors was from 0.75 to 0.88. CFA confirmed the final models for perceived advantages and disadvantages. CONCLUSION: WCPAD questionnaire has good reliability and validity, and the factors obtained from factor analysis can measure the reasons for using or otherwise of white canes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10466727 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104667272023-08-31 Development and validation of a white cane use perceived advantages and disadvantages (WCPAD) questionnaire Rasouli Kahaki, Zeinab Karimi, Masoud Taherian, Masoud Simi, Roghayyeh BMC Psychol Research BACKGROUND: The white cane is globally an important tool in orientation and mobility for blind and visually impaired people, but it is not often used. The goal of this study was to develop and validate the white cane use perceived advantages and disadvantages (WCPAD) questionnaire for detecting effective factors in the use or non-use of canes. METHOD: The initial questionnaire items were extracted through semi-structured interviews with 21 blind or severely impaired vision individuals under two main themes, the perceived advantages, and disadvantages of using a white cane. Linguistic validity and writing evaluation with seven experts, face validity with 23 blind persons, content validity ratio (CVR), and content validity index (CVI) were used for assessment of validity. Internal and external reliability assessment was done using Cronbach’s alpha and intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Explanatory factor analysis was conducted to identify the factors of the questionnaire; then, corrected item-total correlations, convergent and discriminant validity, and Confirmatory Factor Analyses (CFA) were done, and model fit indices were reported. A total of 320 blind and severe visual impaired individuals (138 males and 182 females) participated in the study. The final questionnaire contained 12 questions in perceived advantages and 21 in perceived disadvantages. RESULTS: Three factors (social participation, mobility, and culture) extracted for perceived advantages which explained 67.95% of the total variance, Cronbach-α for the three extracted factors was between 0.75 and 0.91. Four factors (social, safety, ergonomics, and family) for perceived disadvantages were extracted which explained 50.98% of the total variance. Cronbach-α for the four extracted factors was from 0.75 to 0.88. CFA confirmed the final models for perceived advantages and disadvantages. CONCLUSION: WCPAD questionnaire has good reliability and validity, and the factors obtained from factor analysis can measure the reasons for using or otherwise of white canes. BioMed Central 2023-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10466727/ /pubmed/37649118 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01282-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Rasouli Kahaki, Zeinab Karimi, Masoud Taherian, Masoud Simi, Roghayyeh Development and validation of a white cane use perceived advantages and disadvantages (WCPAD) questionnaire |
title | Development and validation of a white cane use perceived advantages and disadvantages (WCPAD) questionnaire |
title_full | Development and validation of a white cane use perceived advantages and disadvantages (WCPAD) questionnaire |
title_fullStr | Development and validation of a white cane use perceived advantages and disadvantages (WCPAD) questionnaire |
title_full_unstemmed | Development and validation of a white cane use perceived advantages and disadvantages (WCPAD) questionnaire |
title_short | Development and validation of a white cane use perceived advantages and disadvantages (WCPAD) questionnaire |
title_sort | development and validation of a white cane use perceived advantages and disadvantages (wcpad) questionnaire |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10466727/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37649118 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40359-023-01282-4 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rasoulikahakizeinab developmentandvalidationofawhitecaneuseperceivedadvantagesanddisadvantageswcpadquestionnaire AT karimimasoud developmentandvalidationofawhitecaneuseperceivedadvantagesanddisadvantageswcpadquestionnaire AT taherianmasoud developmentandvalidationofawhitecaneuseperceivedadvantagesanddisadvantageswcpadquestionnaire AT simiroghayyeh developmentandvalidationofawhitecaneuseperceivedadvantagesanddisadvantageswcpadquestionnaire |