Cargando…
Comparison of the intraarticular osteotomy and the “window” osteotomy in the treatment of tibial plateau fracture involving depressed posterolateral fragments
OBJECTIVES: The methods of reduction of depressed posterolateral fragments in tibial plateau fracture through anterolateral approaches remain controversial. This paper aimed to compare the intraarticular osteotomy technique and the “window” osteotomy technique for the reduction of depressed posterol...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10466811/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37649090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06803-1 |
_version_ | 1785098972940992512 |
---|---|
author | Fang, Zhixun Pei, Xuan Cheng, Yipeng Chen, Jianan Zhou, Wei Chen, Yu Baosu, Yaolatu Qian, Shenglong Liu, Ximing Wang, Guodong |
author_facet | Fang, Zhixun Pei, Xuan Cheng, Yipeng Chen, Jianan Zhou, Wei Chen, Yu Baosu, Yaolatu Qian, Shenglong Liu, Ximing Wang, Guodong |
author_sort | Fang, Zhixun |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The methods of reduction of depressed posterolateral fragments in tibial plateau fracture through anterolateral approaches remain controversial. This paper aimed to compare the intraarticular osteotomy technique and the “window” osteotomy technique for the reduction of depressed posterolateral fragments through anterolateral approach. METHOD: From January 2015 to January 2022, we retrospectively reviewed the data on patients with tibial plateau fracture involving depressed posterolateral fragments treated with the intraarticular osteotomy or the “window” osteotomy. 40 patients underwent the intraarticular osteotomy were divided into group A, while 36 patients underwent the “window” osteotomy were divided into group B. The operative time, bone grafting volume, fracture healing time, complication, reduction quality and postoperative functional results were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The average follow-up duration was 16.6 ± 3.7 months. The average bone grafting volume for all patients in group B was essential larger than group A (p = 0.001). Compared to group B, patients in groups A had significantly shorter fracture healing time (p = 0.011). The depth of depressed articular surface, PSA and the radiographic evaluation at 2 days and 6 months after surgery in group A were significantly lower than group B (p<0.05). Based on the HSS knee-rating score, no significant difference in function results was found between the two groups (p>0.05). No significant difference was found in operation time and blood loss between the two groups (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: The intraarticular osteotomy could obtain satisfactory clinical results in tibial plateau fracture involving posterolateral fragments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10466811 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104668112023-08-31 Comparison of the intraarticular osteotomy and the “window” osteotomy in the treatment of tibial plateau fracture involving depressed posterolateral fragments Fang, Zhixun Pei, Xuan Cheng, Yipeng Chen, Jianan Zhou, Wei Chen, Yu Baosu, Yaolatu Qian, Shenglong Liu, Ximing Wang, Guodong BMC Musculoskelet Disord Research OBJECTIVES: The methods of reduction of depressed posterolateral fragments in tibial plateau fracture through anterolateral approaches remain controversial. This paper aimed to compare the intraarticular osteotomy technique and the “window” osteotomy technique for the reduction of depressed posterolateral fragments through anterolateral approach. METHOD: From January 2015 to January 2022, we retrospectively reviewed the data on patients with tibial plateau fracture involving depressed posterolateral fragments treated with the intraarticular osteotomy or the “window” osteotomy. 40 patients underwent the intraarticular osteotomy were divided into group A, while 36 patients underwent the “window” osteotomy were divided into group B. The operative time, bone grafting volume, fracture healing time, complication, reduction quality and postoperative functional results were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: The average follow-up duration was 16.6 ± 3.7 months. The average bone grafting volume for all patients in group B was essential larger than group A (p = 0.001). Compared to group B, patients in groups A had significantly shorter fracture healing time (p = 0.011). The depth of depressed articular surface, PSA and the radiographic evaluation at 2 days and 6 months after surgery in group A were significantly lower than group B (p<0.05). Based on the HSS knee-rating score, no significant difference in function results was found between the two groups (p>0.05). No significant difference was found in operation time and blood loss between the two groups (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: The intraarticular osteotomy could obtain satisfactory clinical results in tibial plateau fracture involving posterolateral fragments. BioMed Central 2023-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10466811/ /pubmed/37649090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06803-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Fang, Zhixun Pei, Xuan Cheng, Yipeng Chen, Jianan Zhou, Wei Chen, Yu Baosu, Yaolatu Qian, Shenglong Liu, Ximing Wang, Guodong Comparison of the intraarticular osteotomy and the “window” osteotomy in the treatment of tibial plateau fracture involving depressed posterolateral fragments |
title | Comparison of the intraarticular osteotomy and the “window” osteotomy in the treatment of tibial plateau fracture involving depressed posterolateral fragments |
title_full | Comparison of the intraarticular osteotomy and the “window” osteotomy in the treatment of tibial plateau fracture involving depressed posterolateral fragments |
title_fullStr | Comparison of the intraarticular osteotomy and the “window” osteotomy in the treatment of tibial plateau fracture involving depressed posterolateral fragments |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the intraarticular osteotomy and the “window” osteotomy in the treatment of tibial plateau fracture involving depressed posterolateral fragments |
title_short | Comparison of the intraarticular osteotomy and the “window” osteotomy in the treatment of tibial plateau fracture involving depressed posterolateral fragments |
title_sort | comparison of the intraarticular osteotomy and the “window” osteotomy in the treatment of tibial plateau fracture involving depressed posterolateral fragments |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10466811/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37649090 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06803-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fangzhixun comparisonoftheintraarticularosteotomyandthewindowosteotomyinthetreatmentoftibialplateaufractureinvolvingdepressedposterolateralfragments AT peixuan comparisonoftheintraarticularosteotomyandthewindowosteotomyinthetreatmentoftibialplateaufractureinvolvingdepressedposterolateralfragments AT chengyipeng comparisonoftheintraarticularosteotomyandthewindowosteotomyinthetreatmentoftibialplateaufractureinvolvingdepressedposterolateralfragments AT chenjianan comparisonoftheintraarticularosteotomyandthewindowosteotomyinthetreatmentoftibialplateaufractureinvolvingdepressedposterolateralfragments AT zhouwei comparisonoftheintraarticularosteotomyandthewindowosteotomyinthetreatmentoftibialplateaufractureinvolvingdepressedposterolateralfragments AT chenyu comparisonoftheintraarticularosteotomyandthewindowosteotomyinthetreatmentoftibialplateaufractureinvolvingdepressedposterolateralfragments AT baosuyaolatu comparisonoftheintraarticularosteotomyandthewindowosteotomyinthetreatmentoftibialplateaufractureinvolvingdepressedposterolateralfragments AT qianshenglong comparisonoftheintraarticularosteotomyandthewindowosteotomyinthetreatmentoftibialplateaufractureinvolvingdepressedposterolateralfragments AT liuximing comparisonoftheintraarticularosteotomyandthewindowosteotomyinthetreatmentoftibialplateaufractureinvolvingdepressedposterolateralfragments AT wangguodong comparisonoftheintraarticularosteotomyandthewindowosteotomyinthetreatmentoftibialplateaufractureinvolvingdepressedposterolateralfragments |