Cargando…
Republication of “Peroneus Brevis Tenodesis: Side-to-Side or Weave?”
BACKGROUND: Inversion ankle injuries are extremely common, sometimes causing injury to the peroneus brevis tendon. If more than 50% of the tendon is injured, it oftentimes requires tenodesis to the adjacent peroneus longus tendon. Both Pulvertaft (PT) and side-to-side (SS) techniques have been used...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10467188/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37655926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/24730114231195333 |
_version_ | 1785099059937148928 |
---|---|
author | Janney, Cory F. Iloanya, Michael Morris, Randal Panchbhavi, Vinod K. |
author_facet | Janney, Cory F. Iloanya, Michael Morris, Randal Panchbhavi, Vinod K. |
author_sort | Janney, Cory F. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Inversion ankle injuries are extremely common, sometimes causing injury to the peroneus brevis tendon. If more than 50% of the tendon is injured, it oftentimes requires tenodesis to the adjacent peroneus longus tendon. Both Pulvertaft (PT) and side-to-side (SS) techniques have been used for joining the 2 tendons. The purpose of this study was to compare the strength and stiffness of these 2 techniques. METHODS: Five matched pairs of cadaver ankle specimens were randomized to receive either an SS or PT tenodesis of the peroneus brevis to longus tendons. Following the tenodesis, the specimens were tested for failure load, displacement, energy absorbed at failure, and peak load. Stiffness was also calculated. Paired t tests were performed to detect differences between the 2 conditions. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the SS and PT tenodesis for any of the metrics measured. For stiffness, the techniques were very similar (SS = 10.14 [4.35], PT = 12.85 [1.72]). CONCLUSION: There is no difference in failure load, displacement, energy absorbed at failure, peak load or stiffness between the PT and SS techniques for peroneal tenodesis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, cadaver study. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10467188 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104671882023-08-31 Republication of “Peroneus Brevis Tenodesis: Side-to-Side or Weave?” Janney, Cory F. Iloanya, Michael Morris, Randal Panchbhavi, Vinod K. Foot Ankle Orthop Article BACKGROUND: Inversion ankle injuries are extremely common, sometimes causing injury to the peroneus brevis tendon. If more than 50% of the tendon is injured, it oftentimes requires tenodesis to the adjacent peroneus longus tendon. Both Pulvertaft (PT) and side-to-side (SS) techniques have been used for joining the 2 tendons. The purpose of this study was to compare the strength and stiffness of these 2 techniques. METHODS: Five matched pairs of cadaver ankle specimens were randomized to receive either an SS or PT tenodesis of the peroneus brevis to longus tendons. Following the tenodesis, the specimens were tested for failure load, displacement, energy absorbed at failure, and peak load. Stiffness was also calculated. Paired t tests were performed to detect differences between the 2 conditions. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the SS and PT tenodesis for any of the metrics measured. For stiffness, the techniques were very similar (SS = 10.14 [4.35], PT = 12.85 [1.72]). CONCLUSION: There is no difference in failure load, displacement, energy absorbed at failure, peak load or stiffness between the PT and SS techniques for peroneal tenodesis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, cadaver study. SAGE Publications 2023-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10467188/ /pubmed/37655926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/24730114231195333 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Article Janney, Cory F. Iloanya, Michael Morris, Randal Panchbhavi, Vinod K. Republication of “Peroneus Brevis Tenodesis: Side-to-Side or Weave?” |
title | Republication of “Peroneus Brevis Tenodesis: Side-to-Side or Weave?” |
title_full | Republication of “Peroneus Brevis Tenodesis: Side-to-Side or Weave?” |
title_fullStr | Republication of “Peroneus Brevis Tenodesis: Side-to-Side or Weave?” |
title_full_unstemmed | Republication of “Peroneus Brevis Tenodesis: Side-to-Side or Weave?” |
title_short | Republication of “Peroneus Brevis Tenodesis: Side-to-Side or Weave?” |
title_sort | republication of “peroneus brevis tenodesis: side-to-side or weave?” |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10467188/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37655926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/24730114231195333 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT janneycoryf republicationofperoneusbrevistenodesissidetosideorweave AT iloanyamichael republicationofperoneusbrevistenodesissidetosideorweave AT morrisrandal republicationofperoneusbrevistenodesissidetosideorweave AT panchbhavivinodk republicationofperoneusbrevistenodesissidetosideorweave |