Cargando…

Republication of “Peroneus Brevis Tenodesis: Side-to-Side or Weave?”

BACKGROUND: Inversion ankle injuries are extremely common, sometimes causing injury to the peroneus brevis tendon. If more than 50% of the tendon is injured, it oftentimes requires tenodesis to the adjacent peroneus longus tendon. Both Pulvertaft (PT) and side-to-side (SS) techniques have been used...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Janney, Cory F., Iloanya, Michael, Morris, Randal, Panchbhavi, Vinod K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10467188/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37655926
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/24730114231195333
_version_ 1785099059937148928
author Janney, Cory F.
Iloanya, Michael
Morris, Randal
Panchbhavi, Vinod K.
author_facet Janney, Cory F.
Iloanya, Michael
Morris, Randal
Panchbhavi, Vinod K.
author_sort Janney, Cory F.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Inversion ankle injuries are extremely common, sometimes causing injury to the peroneus brevis tendon. If more than 50% of the tendon is injured, it oftentimes requires tenodesis to the adjacent peroneus longus tendon. Both Pulvertaft (PT) and side-to-side (SS) techniques have been used for joining the 2 tendons. The purpose of this study was to compare the strength and stiffness of these 2 techniques. METHODS: Five matched pairs of cadaver ankle specimens were randomized to receive either an SS or PT tenodesis of the peroneus brevis to longus tendons. Following the tenodesis, the specimens were tested for failure load, displacement, energy absorbed at failure, and peak load. Stiffness was also calculated. Paired t tests were performed to detect differences between the 2 conditions. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the SS and PT tenodesis for any of the metrics measured. For stiffness, the techniques were very similar (SS = 10.14 [4.35], PT = 12.85 [1.72]). CONCLUSION: There is no difference in failure load, displacement, energy absorbed at failure, peak load or stiffness between the PT and SS techniques for peroneal tenodesis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, cadaver study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10467188
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104671882023-08-31 Republication of “Peroneus Brevis Tenodesis: Side-to-Side or Weave?” Janney, Cory F. Iloanya, Michael Morris, Randal Panchbhavi, Vinod K. Foot Ankle Orthop Article BACKGROUND: Inversion ankle injuries are extremely common, sometimes causing injury to the peroneus brevis tendon. If more than 50% of the tendon is injured, it oftentimes requires tenodesis to the adjacent peroneus longus tendon. Both Pulvertaft (PT) and side-to-side (SS) techniques have been used for joining the 2 tendons. The purpose of this study was to compare the strength and stiffness of these 2 techniques. METHODS: Five matched pairs of cadaver ankle specimens were randomized to receive either an SS or PT tenodesis of the peroneus brevis to longus tendons. Following the tenodesis, the specimens were tested for failure load, displacement, energy absorbed at failure, and peak load. Stiffness was also calculated. Paired t tests were performed to detect differences between the 2 conditions. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the SS and PT tenodesis for any of the metrics measured. For stiffness, the techniques were very similar (SS = 10.14 [4.35], PT = 12.85 [1.72]). CONCLUSION: There is no difference in failure load, displacement, energy absorbed at failure, peak load or stiffness between the PT and SS techniques for peroneal tenodesis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level V, cadaver study. SAGE Publications 2023-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC10467188/ /pubmed/37655926 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/24730114231195333 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Janney, Cory F.
Iloanya, Michael
Morris, Randal
Panchbhavi, Vinod K.
Republication of “Peroneus Brevis Tenodesis: Side-to-Side or Weave?”
title Republication of “Peroneus Brevis Tenodesis: Side-to-Side or Weave?”
title_full Republication of “Peroneus Brevis Tenodesis: Side-to-Side or Weave?”
title_fullStr Republication of “Peroneus Brevis Tenodesis: Side-to-Side or Weave?”
title_full_unstemmed Republication of “Peroneus Brevis Tenodesis: Side-to-Side or Weave?”
title_short Republication of “Peroneus Brevis Tenodesis: Side-to-Side or Weave?”
title_sort republication of “peroneus brevis tenodesis: side-to-side or weave?”
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10467188/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37655926
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/24730114231195333
work_keys_str_mv AT janneycoryf republicationofperoneusbrevistenodesissidetosideorweave
AT iloanyamichael republicationofperoneusbrevistenodesissidetosideorweave
AT morrisrandal republicationofperoneusbrevistenodesissidetosideorweave
AT panchbhavivinodk republicationofperoneusbrevistenodesissidetosideorweave