Cargando…

Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Surgical Versus Nonsurgical Treatment for Acute Rockwood Type 3 Acromioclavicular Injury

BACKGROUND: Evidence for the superiority of surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of Rockwood type 3 acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation is still lacking. HYPOTHESIS: It was hypothesized that surgical treatment will outperform nonsurgical treatment. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial; L...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tauber, Mark, Hoffelner, Thomas, Lehmann, Lars, Kraus, Natascha, Scheibel, Markus, Moroder, Philipp
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10467399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37655239
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671231190411
_version_ 1785099103813763072
author Tauber, Mark
Hoffelner, Thomas
Lehmann, Lars
Kraus, Natascha
Scheibel, Markus
Moroder, Philipp
author_facet Tauber, Mark
Hoffelner, Thomas
Lehmann, Lars
Kraus, Natascha
Scheibel, Markus
Moroder, Philipp
author_sort Tauber, Mark
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evidence for the superiority of surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of Rockwood type 3 acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation is still lacking. HYPOTHESIS: It was hypothesized that surgical treatment will outperform nonsurgical treatment. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. METHODS: A prospective randomized trial involving 4 study centers was performed from January 1, 2011, to March 31, 2016. A total of 85 patients with acute Rockwood type 3 ACJ dislocations were allocated randomly to receive either nonsurgical or surgical treatment. A total of 70 patients were treated as allocated, and 8 patients made an early crossover from nonsurgical to surgical treatment, leaving 47 patients treated surgically and 31 patients nonsurgically. All patients were followed up longitudinally, including clinical evaluation using the Constant score and standardized radiographic evaluation, with final follow-up after 2 years. RESULTS: At no follow-up time point was there a significant difference in Constant score between the surgically and nonsurgically treated patients. Radiographic analysis showed not only an inferior coracoclavicular distance at all follow-up points for surgical treatment but also a higher incidence of posttraumatic osteoarthritis and heterotopic ossifications, without any negative clinical correlation. With regard to complications, 1 patient (3%) in the nonsurgical group underwent secondary surgical ACJ stabilization. The revision rate after surgical treatment was 17% (P < .001). Neither primary horizontal instability nor younger age were associated with inferior clinical outcomes after nonsurgical treatment. CONCLUSION: Surgical treatment of ACJ Rockwood type 3 injuries did not lead to superior functional outcomes. Neither younger age nor horizontal instability were associated with inferior outcomes after nonsurgical treatment. Surgical treatment led to a slower recovery and to higher complication and revision rates. REGISTRATION: ISRCTN registry (study ID: ISRCTN92265154).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10467399
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104673992023-08-31 Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Surgical Versus Nonsurgical Treatment for Acute Rockwood Type 3 Acromioclavicular Injury Tauber, Mark Hoffelner, Thomas Lehmann, Lars Kraus, Natascha Scheibel, Markus Moroder, Philipp Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: Evidence for the superiority of surgical versus nonsurgical treatment of Rockwood type 3 acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) dislocation is still lacking. HYPOTHESIS: It was hypothesized that surgical treatment will outperform nonsurgical treatment. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. METHODS: A prospective randomized trial involving 4 study centers was performed from January 1, 2011, to March 31, 2016. A total of 85 patients with acute Rockwood type 3 ACJ dislocations were allocated randomly to receive either nonsurgical or surgical treatment. A total of 70 patients were treated as allocated, and 8 patients made an early crossover from nonsurgical to surgical treatment, leaving 47 patients treated surgically and 31 patients nonsurgically. All patients were followed up longitudinally, including clinical evaluation using the Constant score and standardized radiographic evaluation, with final follow-up after 2 years. RESULTS: At no follow-up time point was there a significant difference in Constant score between the surgically and nonsurgically treated patients. Radiographic analysis showed not only an inferior coracoclavicular distance at all follow-up points for surgical treatment but also a higher incidence of posttraumatic osteoarthritis and heterotopic ossifications, without any negative clinical correlation. With regard to complications, 1 patient (3%) in the nonsurgical group underwent secondary surgical ACJ stabilization. The revision rate after surgical treatment was 17% (P < .001). Neither primary horizontal instability nor younger age were associated with inferior clinical outcomes after nonsurgical treatment. CONCLUSION: Surgical treatment of ACJ Rockwood type 3 injuries did not lead to superior functional outcomes. Neither younger age nor horizontal instability were associated with inferior outcomes after nonsurgical treatment. Surgical treatment led to a slower recovery and to higher complication and revision rates. REGISTRATION: ISRCTN registry (study ID: ISRCTN92265154). SAGE Publications 2023-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10467399/ /pubmed/37655239 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671231190411 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Tauber, Mark
Hoffelner, Thomas
Lehmann, Lars
Kraus, Natascha
Scheibel, Markus
Moroder, Philipp
Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Surgical Versus Nonsurgical Treatment for Acute Rockwood Type 3 Acromioclavicular Injury
title Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Surgical Versus Nonsurgical Treatment for Acute Rockwood Type 3 Acromioclavicular Injury
title_full Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Surgical Versus Nonsurgical Treatment for Acute Rockwood Type 3 Acromioclavicular Injury
title_fullStr Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Surgical Versus Nonsurgical Treatment for Acute Rockwood Type 3 Acromioclavicular Injury
title_full_unstemmed Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Surgical Versus Nonsurgical Treatment for Acute Rockwood Type 3 Acromioclavicular Injury
title_short Prospective Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial of Surgical Versus Nonsurgical Treatment for Acute Rockwood Type 3 Acromioclavicular Injury
title_sort prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial of surgical versus nonsurgical treatment for acute rockwood type 3 acromioclavicular injury
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10467399/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37655239
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671231190411
work_keys_str_mv AT taubermark prospectivemulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialofsurgicalversusnonsurgicaltreatmentforacuterockwoodtype3acromioclavicularinjury
AT hoffelnerthomas prospectivemulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialofsurgicalversusnonsurgicaltreatmentforacuterockwoodtype3acromioclavicularinjury
AT lehmannlars prospectivemulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialofsurgicalversusnonsurgicaltreatmentforacuterockwoodtype3acromioclavicularinjury
AT krausnatascha prospectivemulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialofsurgicalversusnonsurgicaltreatmentforacuterockwoodtype3acromioclavicularinjury
AT scheibelmarkus prospectivemulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialofsurgicalversusnonsurgicaltreatmentforacuterockwoodtype3acromioclavicularinjury
AT moroderphilipp prospectivemulticenterrandomizedcontrolledtrialofsurgicalversusnonsurgicaltreatmentforacuterockwoodtype3acromioclavicularinjury