Cargando…

Incidence of Repeat Elbow Capsular Release After Arthroscopic Elbow Capsular Release

BACKGROUND: Elbow capsular release can be performed arthroscopically or through an open method to improve range of motion (ROM). However, it is unclear how frequently patients require an open capsular release after unsatisfactory results from an arthroscopic release. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hall, Anya T., Paul, Ryan W., Lencer, Adam, Smith, Brandon, Ciccotti, Michael G., Tjoumakaris, Fotios P., Erickson, Brandon J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10467412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37655243
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671231190381
_version_ 1785099107393601536
author Hall, Anya T.
Paul, Ryan W.
Lencer, Adam
Smith, Brandon
Ciccotti, Michael G.
Tjoumakaris, Fotios P.
Erickson, Brandon J.
author_facet Hall, Anya T.
Paul, Ryan W.
Lencer, Adam
Smith, Brandon
Ciccotti, Michael G.
Tjoumakaris, Fotios P.
Erickson, Brandon J.
author_sort Hall, Anya T.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Elbow capsular release can be performed arthroscopically or through an open method to improve range of motion (ROM). However, it is unclear how frequently patients require an open capsular release after unsatisfactory results from an arthroscopic release. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to determine the percentage of patients who underwent an arthroscopic elbow release for loss of motion who then required a repeat elbow capsular release or other subsequent surgery on the same elbow. It was hypothesized that patients who underwent arthroscopic elbow release would rarely (<5%) require a subsequent elbow release. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: Patients who underwent arthroscopic elbow capsular release from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2019, were identified by chart review and procedure code. Demographic parameters, pre- and postoperative ROM, and surgical history were collected by chart review. Follow-up data included patient satisfaction and the Timmerman-Andrews (TA) elbow score. Data were compared between patients who did and those who did not require subsequent elbow surgery. RESULTS: Overall, of 140 study patients (116 male, 24 female; mean age, 49.6 years), 18 (12.9%) required subsequent surgery, including 6 capsular releases (4.3%; 1 open and 5 arthroscopic). The most common follow-up procedure was ulnar nerve releases/transpositions (n = 7). Total arc of elbow motion (flexion to extension) improved by a mean of 51.4°. The mean TA score was 76.5 ± 20.4 at a mean of 5.25 years postoperatively. Mean satisfaction score was 77.6 ± 26.3. In this study, 82.4% of patients stated that their symptoms either improved or resolved completely. Patients who required subsequent surgery had a significantly lower preoperative total arc of elbow motion versus those who did not require subsequent surgery (P = .046). There was no difference between the groups in symptom resolution, satisfaction, ROM, or TA score (P ≥ .279 for all). CONCLUSION: After arthroscopic elbow release, <5% of patients required a repeat elbow capsular release, 12.9% required some form of follow-up elbow surgery, and 4.3% had a new injury of the elbow. Overall, patients saw improvement in elbow ROM, but many still had residual symptoms from their underlying disease after arthroscopic elbow capsular release.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10467412
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104674122023-08-31 Incidence of Repeat Elbow Capsular Release After Arthroscopic Elbow Capsular Release Hall, Anya T. Paul, Ryan W. Lencer, Adam Smith, Brandon Ciccotti, Michael G. Tjoumakaris, Fotios P. Erickson, Brandon J. Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: Elbow capsular release can be performed arthroscopically or through an open method to improve range of motion (ROM). However, it is unclear how frequently patients require an open capsular release after unsatisfactory results from an arthroscopic release. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to determine the percentage of patients who underwent an arthroscopic elbow release for loss of motion who then required a repeat elbow capsular release or other subsequent surgery on the same elbow. It was hypothesized that patients who underwent arthroscopic elbow release would rarely (<5%) require a subsequent elbow release. STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS: Patients who underwent arthroscopic elbow capsular release from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2019, were identified by chart review and procedure code. Demographic parameters, pre- and postoperative ROM, and surgical history were collected by chart review. Follow-up data included patient satisfaction and the Timmerman-Andrews (TA) elbow score. Data were compared between patients who did and those who did not require subsequent elbow surgery. RESULTS: Overall, of 140 study patients (116 male, 24 female; mean age, 49.6 years), 18 (12.9%) required subsequent surgery, including 6 capsular releases (4.3%; 1 open and 5 arthroscopic). The most common follow-up procedure was ulnar nerve releases/transpositions (n = 7). Total arc of elbow motion (flexion to extension) improved by a mean of 51.4°. The mean TA score was 76.5 ± 20.4 at a mean of 5.25 years postoperatively. Mean satisfaction score was 77.6 ± 26.3. In this study, 82.4% of patients stated that their symptoms either improved or resolved completely. Patients who required subsequent surgery had a significantly lower preoperative total arc of elbow motion versus those who did not require subsequent surgery (P = .046). There was no difference between the groups in symptom resolution, satisfaction, ROM, or TA score (P ≥ .279 for all). CONCLUSION: After arthroscopic elbow release, <5% of patients required a repeat elbow capsular release, 12.9% required some form of follow-up elbow surgery, and 4.3% had a new injury of the elbow. Overall, patients saw improvement in elbow ROM, but many still had residual symptoms from their underlying disease after arthroscopic elbow capsular release. SAGE Publications 2023-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10467412/ /pubmed/37655243 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671231190381 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
Hall, Anya T.
Paul, Ryan W.
Lencer, Adam
Smith, Brandon
Ciccotti, Michael G.
Tjoumakaris, Fotios P.
Erickson, Brandon J.
Incidence of Repeat Elbow Capsular Release After Arthroscopic Elbow Capsular Release
title Incidence of Repeat Elbow Capsular Release After Arthroscopic Elbow Capsular Release
title_full Incidence of Repeat Elbow Capsular Release After Arthroscopic Elbow Capsular Release
title_fullStr Incidence of Repeat Elbow Capsular Release After Arthroscopic Elbow Capsular Release
title_full_unstemmed Incidence of Repeat Elbow Capsular Release After Arthroscopic Elbow Capsular Release
title_short Incidence of Repeat Elbow Capsular Release After Arthroscopic Elbow Capsular Release
title_sort incidence of repeat elbow capsular release after arthroscopic elbow capsular release
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10467412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37655243
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671231190381
work_keys_str_mv AT hallanyat incidenceofrepeatelbowcapsularreleaseafterarthroscopicelbowcapsularrelease
AT paulryanw incidenceofrepeatelbowcapsularreleaseafterarthroscopicelbowcapsularrelease
AT lenceradam incidenceofrepeatelbowcapsularreleaseafterarthroscopicelbowcapsularrelease
AT smithbrandon incidenceofrepeatelbowcapsularreleaseafterarthroscopicelbowcapsularrelease
AT ciccottimichaelg incidenceofrepeatelbowcapsularreleaseafterarthroscopicelbowcapsularrelease
AT tjoumakarisfotiosp incidenceofrepeatelbowcapsularreleaseafterarthroscopicelbowcapsularrelease
AT ericksonbrandonj incidenceofrepeatelbowcapsularreleaseafterarthroscopicelbowcapsularrelease