Cargando…

Anterior Displacement of Tibial Spine Fractures: Does Anatomic Reduction Matter?

BACKGROUND: Operative treatment of displaced tibial spine fractures consists of fixation and reduction of the fragment in addition to restoring tension of the anterior cruciate ligament. PURPOSE: To determine whether residual displacement of the anterior portion of a tibial spine fragment affects th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: McGurty, Shannon A., Ganley, Theodore J., Kushare, Indranil, Leska, Tomasina M., Aoyama, Julian T., Ellis, Henry B., Johnson, Ben, Baghdadi, Soroush, Cruz, Aristides I., Fabricant, Peter D., Green, Daniel W., Lee, R. Jay, McKay, Scott D., Milbrandt, Todd A., Patel, Neeraj M., Rhodes, Jason T., Sachleben, Brant, Traver, Jessica L., Mistovich, R. Justin, Schmale, Gregory A., Cook, Danielle L., Yen, Yi-Meng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10467414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37655244
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671231192978
_version_ 1785099107868606464
author McGurty, Shannon A.
Ganley, Theodore J.
Kushare, Indranil
Leska, Tomasina M.
Aoyama, Julian T.
Ellis, Henry B.
Johnson, Ben
Baghdadi, Soroush
Cruz, Aristides I.
Fabricant, Peter D.
Green, Daniel W.
Lee, R. Jay
McKay, Scott D.
Milbrandt, Todd A.
Patel, Neeraj M.
Rhodes, Jason T.
Sachleben, Brant
Traver, Jessica L.
Mistovich, R. Justin
Schmale, Gregory A.
Cook, Danielle L.
Yen, Yi-Meng
author_facet McGurty, Shannon A.
Ganley, Theodore J.
Kushare, Indranil
Leska, Tomasina M.
Aoyama, Julian T.
Ellis, Henry B.
Johnson, Ben
Baghdadi, Soroush
Cruz, Aristides I.
Fabricant, Peter D.
Green, Daniel W.
Lee, R. Jay
McKay, Scott D.
Milbrandt, Todd A.
Patel, Neeraj M.
Rhodes, Jason T.
Sachleben, Brant
Traver, Jessica L.
Mistovich, R. Justin
Schmale, Gregory A.
Cook, Danielle L.
Yen, Yi-Meng
author_sort McGurty, Shannon A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Operative treatment of displaced tibial spine fractures consists of fixation and reduction of the fragment in addition to restoring tension of the anterior cruciate ligament. PURPOSE: To determine whether residual displacement of the anterior portion of a tibial spine fragment affects the range of motion (ROM) or laxity in operatively and nonoperatively treated patients. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Data were gathered from 328 patients younger than 18 years who were treated for tibial spine fractures between 2000 and 2019 at 10 institutions. ROM and anterior lip displacement (ALD) measurements were summarized and compared from pretreatment to final follow-up. ALD measurements were categorized as excellent (0 to <1 mm), good (1 to <3 mm), fair (3 to 5 mm), or poor (>5 mm). Posttreatment residual laxity and arthrofibrosis were assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 88% of patients (290/328) underwent operative treatment. The median follow-up was 8.1 months (range, 3-152 months) for the operative group and 6.7 months (range, 3-72 months) for the nonoperative group. The median ALD measurement of the cohort was 6 mm pretreatment, decreasing to 0 mm after treatment (P < .001). At final follow-up, 62% of all patients (203/328) had excellent ALD measurements, compared with 5% (12/264) before treatment. Subjective laxity was seen in 11% of the nonoperative group (4/37) and 5% of the operative group (15/285; P = .25). Across the cohort, there was no association between final knee ROM and final ALD category. While there were more patients with arthrofibrosis in the operative group (7%) compared with the nonoperative group (3%) (P = .49), this was not different across the ALD displacement categories. CONCLUSION: Residual ALD was not associated with posttreatment subjective residual laxity, extension loss, or flexion loss. The results suggest that anatomic reduction of a tibial spine fracture may not be mandatory if knee stability and functional ROM are achieved.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10467414
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104674142023-08-31 Anterior Displacement of Tibial Spine Fractures: Does Anatomic Reduction Matter? McGurty, Shannon A. Ganley, Theodore J. Kushare, Indranil Leska, Tomasina M. Aoyama, Julian T. Ellis, Henry B. Johnson, Ben Baghdadi, Soroush Cruz, Aristides I. Fabricant, Peter D. Green, Daniel W. Lee, R. Jay McKay, Scott D. Milbrandt, Todd A. Patel, Neeraj M. Rhodes, Jason T. Sachleben, Brant Traver, Jessica L. Mistovich, R. Justin Schmale, Gregory A. Cook, Danielle L. Yen, Yi-Meng Orthop J Sports Med Article BACKGROUND: Operative treatment of displaced tibial spine fractures consists of fixation and reduction of the fragment in addition to restoring tension of the anterior cruciate ligament. PURPOSE: To determine whether residual displacement of the anterior portion of a tibial spine fragment affects the range of motion (ROM) or laxity in operatively and nonoperatively treated patients. STUDY DESIGN: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. METHODS: Data were gathered from 328 patients younger than 18 years who were treated for tibial spine fractures between 2000 and 2019 at 10 institutions. ROM and anterior lip displacement (ALD) measurements were summarized and compared from pretreatment to final follow-up. ALD measurements were categorized as excellent (0 to <1 mm), good (1 to <3 mm), fair (3 to 5 mm), or poor (>5 mm). Posttreatment residual laxity and arthrofibrosis were assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 88% of patients (290/328) underwent operative treatment. The median follow-up was 8.1 months (range, 3-152 months) for the operative group and 6.7 months (range, 3-72 months) for the nonoperative group. The median ALD measurement of the cohort was 6 mm pretreatment, decreasing to 0 mm after treatment (P < .001). At final follow-up, 62% of all patients (203/328) had excellent ALD measurements, compared with 5% (12/264) before treatment. Subjective laxity was seen in 11% of the nonoperative group (4/37) and 5% of the operative group (15/285; P = .25). Across the cohort, there was no association between final knee ROM and final ALD category. While there were more patients with arthrofibrosis in the operative group (7%) compared with the nonoperative group (3%) (P = .49), this was not different across the ALD displacement categories. CONCLUSION: Residual ALD was not associated with posttreatment subjective residual laxity, extension loss, or flexion loss. The results suggest that anatomic reduction of a tibial spine fracture may not be mandatory if knee stability and functional ROM are achieved. SAGE Publications 2023-08-22 /pmc/articles/PMC10467414/ /pubmed/37655244 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671231192978 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work as published without adaptation or alteration, without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Article
McGurty, Shannon A.
Ganley, Theodore J.
Kushare, Indranil
Leska, Tomasina M.
Aoyama, Julian T.
Ellis, Henry B.
Johnson, Ben
Baghdadi, Soroush
Cruz, Aristides I.
Fabricant, Peter D.
Green, Daniel W.
Lee, R. Jay
McKay, Scott D.
Milbrandt, Todd A.
Patel, Neeraj M.
Rhodes, Jason T.
Sachleben, Brant
Traver, Jessica L.
Mistovich, R. Justin
Schmale, Gregory A.
Cook, Danielle L.
Yen, Yi-Meng
Anterior Displacement of Tibial Spine Fractures: Does Anatomic Reduction Matter?
title Anterior Displacement of Tibial Spine Fractures: Does Anatomic Reduction Matter?
title_full Anterior Displacement of Tibial Spine Fractures: Does Anatomic Reduction Matter?
title_fullStr Anterior Displacement of Tibial Spine Fractures: Does Anatomic Reduction Matter?
title_full_unstemmed Anterior Displacement of Tibial Spine Fractures: Does Anatomic Reduction Matter?
title_short Anterior Displacement of Tibial Spine Fractures: Does Anatomic Reduction Matter?
title_sort anterior displacement of tibial spine fractures: does anatomic reduction matter?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10467414/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37655244
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23259671231192978
work_keys_str_mv AT mcgurtyshannona anteriordisplacementoftibialspinefracturesdoesanatomicreductionmatter
AT ganleytheodorej anteriordisplacementoftibialspinefracturesdoesanatomicreductionmatter
AT kushareindranil anteriordisplacementoftibialspinefracturesdoesanatomicreductionmatter
AT leskatomasinam anteriordisplacementoftibialspinefracturesdoesanatomicreductionmatter
AT aoyamajuliant anteriordisplacementoftibialspinefracturesdoesanatomicreductionmatter
AT ellishenryb anteriordisplacementoftibialspinefracturesdoesanatomicreductionmatter
AT johnsonben anteriordisplacementoftibialspinefracturesdoesanatomicreductionmatter
AT baghdadisoroush anteriordisplacementoftibialspinefracturesdoesanatomicreductionmatter
AT cruzaristidesi anteriordisplacementoftibialspinefracturesdoesanatomicreductionmatter
AT fabricantpeterd anteriordisplacementoftibialspinefracturesdoesanatomicreductionmatter
AT greendanielw anteriordisplacementoftibialspinefracturesdoesanatomicreductionmatter
AT leerjay anteriordisplacementoftibialspinefracturesdoesanatomicreductionmatter
AT mckayscottd anteriordisplacementoftibialspinefracturesdoesanatomicreductionmatter
AT milbrandttodda anteriordisplacementoftibialspinefracturesdoesanatomicreductionmatter
AT patelneerajm anteriordisplacementoftibialspinefracturesdoesanatomicreductionmatter
AT rhodesjasont anteriordisplacementoftibialspinefracturesdoesanatomicreductionmatter
AT sachlebenbrant anteriordisplacementoftibialspinefracturesdoesanatomicreductionmatter
AT traverjessical anteriordisplacementoftibialspinefracturesdoesanatomicreductionmatter
AT mistovichrjustin anteriordisplacementoftibialspinefracturesdoesanatomicreductionmatter
AT schmalegregorya anteriordisplacementoftibialspinefracturesdoesanatomicreductionmatter
AT cookdaniellel anteriordisplacementoftibialspinefracturesdoesanatomicreductionmatter
AT yenyimeng anteriordisplacementoftibialspinefracturesdoesanatomicreductionmatter