Cargando…
Estimating the false discovery risk of (randomized) clinical trials in medical journals based on published p-values
The influential claim that most published results are false raised concerns about the trustworthiness and integrity of science. Since then, there have been numerous attempts to examine the rate of false-positive results that have failed to settle this question empirically. Here we propose a new way...
Autores principales: | Schimmack, Ulrich, Bartoš, František |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10468063/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37647247 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290084 |
Ejemplares similares
-
An investigation of the false discovery rate and the misinterpretation of p-values
por: Colquhoun, David
Publicado: (2014) -
The assessment of the quality of randomized controlled trials published in Indian medical journals
por: Goenka, Luxitaa, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Risk of bias of randomized controlled trials published in orthopaedic journals
por: Chess, Laura E, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
ConReg-R: Extrapolative recalibration of the empirical distribution of p-values to improve false discovery rate estimates
por: Li, Juntao, et al.
Publicado: (2011) -
Randomized trials published in some Chinese journals: how many are randomized?
por: Wu, Taixiang, et al.
Publicado: (2009)