Cargando…

Pain in older adults with dementia: Brazilian validation of Pain Intensity Measure for Persons with Dementia (PIMD)

Background  Although there are several ways to assess pain in dementia, there is still a need for tools with better items to assess the presence of pain intensity in these individuals. Objective  To validate to Brazilian version of the “Pain Intensity Measure for Persons with Dementia – PIMD-p. Meth...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Foraciepe, Mariana, Silva, Ana Elisa V. F., Fares, Thais G., Santos, Fânia Cristina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Revinter Publicações Ltda. 2023
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10468240/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37647905
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1771174
Descripción
Sumario:Background  Although there are several ways to assess pain in dementia, there is still a need for tools with better items to assess the presence of pain intensity in these individuals. Objective  To validate to Brazilian version of the “Pain Intensity Measure for Persons with Dementia – PIMD-p. Methods  Older adults, all demented with impaired verbal communication and exposed to potentially painful situations, were selected from an outpatient clinic and long-term care facility (LTCF). The PIMD-p was applied independently by 2 researchers (E1 and E2) on the same day. Within 14 days, the instrument was reapplied by one of the 2 researchers (E3). The pain intensity reported by participants' caregivers and LTCF nurses were recorded on a verbal numeric pain scale. For the statistical analysis, Cronbach's Alpha, Spearman's Coefficient and intraclass correlation Index were calculated. Results  A total of 50 older individuals were selected (mean age 86 years), majority with musculoskeletal pain. The PIMD-p demonstrated good internal consistency according to Cronbach's α (0.838), excellent intra and interobserver reproducibility (0.927 and 0.970, respectively; p  < 0.001), and convergent validity (strong significant correlations between reported pain intensities and pain indicators on the PIMD-p (except for expressive eyes; corr = 0.106 and p  = 0.462). A ROC curve was plotted to determine the best cut-off for the PIMD-P, and a score of 7.5 predicted moderate-to-severe pain, with 77.8% sensitivity and 95.7% specificity ( p  < 0.001). Conclusion  The PIMD-p showed satisfactory psychometric properties for measuring intensity of pain in demented older adults with impaired verbal communication.