Cargando…
Systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided versus landmark corticosteroid injection in the treatment of shoulder pain: an update
BACKGROUND: Corticosteroid (CS) can be injected in a blind fashion (landmark-guided) or with ultrasound (US) guidance, and this may contribute to varying clinical results. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of US-guided versus landmark CS injections in...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2022
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10468470/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35524038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40477-022-00684-1 |
_version_ | 1785099243557486592 |
---|---|
author | ElMeligie, Mohamed Magdy Allam, Nashwa M. Yehia, Radwa M. Ashour, Ahmed A. |
author_facet | ElMeligie, Mohamed Magdy Allam, Nashwa M. Yehia, Radwa M. Ashour, Ahmed A. |
author_sort | ElMeligie, Mohamed Magdy |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Corticosteroid (CS) can be injected in a blind fashion (landmark-guided) or with ultrasound (US) guidance, and this may contribute to varying clinical results. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of US-guided versus landmark CS injections in the treatment of adult patients with shoulder pain. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE (via PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science, EBSCO, and Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing US-guided versus landmark CS injection regarding visual analogue scale (VAS), functional scores, disability scores, abduction degree, and side effects. The data were pooled as mean difference (MD), standardized mean difference (SMD), or risk ratios (RRs), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), using R software (meta package 4.9-0) for windows. Subgroup analysis and leave-one-out analysis were conducted. RESULTS: Eighteen RCTs, with a total of 1010 patients, were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled estimate favored the US-guided over landmark CS injection in terms of the mean change of VAS between 6 weeks and baseline (SMD = − 0.48, 95% CI [− 0.79, − 0.17]), the shoulder functional scores (SMD = 0.35, 95% CI [0.05, 0.65]) and shoulder abduction degree (MD = 8.78, 95% CI [3.11, 14.46]). Whilst no significant difference was found between the compared group regarding the overall shoulder disability scores (SMD = − 0.51, 95% CI (− 1.25, 0.22]) and side effects (RR = 0.45, 95% CI [0.15, 1.34]). None of the eligible study analyzed the cost-effectiveness of the US-guided method compared with the landmark method for CS injection. CONCLUSION: Our analysis showed that US-guided CS injection was effective in the treatment of various shoulder diseases. Further research on the cost-effectiveness of US-guided CS methods is needed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40477-022-00684-1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10468470 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2022 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104684702023-09-01 Systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided versus landmark corticosteroid injection in the treatment of shoulder pain: an update ElMeligie, Mohamed Magdy Allam, Nashwa M. Yehia, Radwa M. Ashour, Ahmed A. J Ultrasound Review Paper BACKGROUND: Corticosteroid (CS) can be injected in a blind fashion (landmark-guided) or with ultrasound (US) guidance, and this may contribute to varying clinical results. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of US-guided versus landmark CS injections in the treatment of adult patients with shoulder pain. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE (via PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science, EBSCO, and Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing US-guided versus landmark CS injection regarding visual analogue scale (VAS), functional scores, disability scores, abduction degree, and side effects. The data were pooled as mean difference (MD), standardized mean difference (SMD), or risk ratios (RRs), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), using R software (meta package 4.9-0) for windows. Subgroup analysis and leave-one-out analysis were conducted. RESULTS: Eighteen RCTs, with a total of 1010 patients, were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled estimate favored the US-guided over landmark CS injection in terms of the mean change of VAS between 6 weeks and baseline (SMD = − 0.48, 95% CI [− 0.79, − 0.17]), the shoulder functional scores (SMD = 0.35, 95% CI [0.05, 0.65]) and shoulder abduction degree (MD = 8.78, 95% CI [3.11, 14.46]). Whilst no significant difference was found between the compared group regarding the overall shoulder disability scores (SMD = − 0.51, 95% CI (− 1.25, 0.22]) and side effects (RR = 0.45, 95% CI [0.15, 1.34]). None of the eligible study analyzed the cost-effectiveness of the US-guided method compared with the landmark method for CS injection. CONCLUSION: Our analysis showed that US-guided CS injection was effective in the treatment of various shoulder diseases. Further research on the cost-effectiveness of US-guided CS methods is needed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40477-022-00684-1. Springer International Publishing 2022-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10468470/ /pubmed/35524038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40477-022-00684-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visithttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Paper ElMeligie, Mohamed Magdy Allam, Nashwa M. Yehia, Radwa M. Ashour, Ahmed A. Systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided versus landmark corticosteroid injection in the treatment of shoulder pain: an update |
title | Systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided versus landmark corticosteroid injection in the treatment of shoulder pain: an update |
title_full | Systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided versus landmark corticosteroid injection in the treatment of shoulder pain: an update |
title_fullStr | Systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided versus landmark corticosteroid injection in the treatment of shoulder pain: an update |
title_full_unstemmed | Systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided versus landmark corticosteroid injection in the treatment of shoulder pain: an update |
title_short | Systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided versus landmark corticosteroid injection in the treatment of shoulder pain: an update |
title_sort | systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided versus landmark corticosteroid injection in the treatment of shoulder pain: an update |
topic | Review Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10468470/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35524038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40477-022-00684-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT elmeligiemohamedmagdy systematicreviewandmetaanalysisontheeffectivenessofultrasoundguidedversuslandmarkcorticosteroidinjectioninthetreatmentofshoulderpainanupdate AT allamnashwam systematicreviewandmetaanalysisontheeffectivenessofultrasoundguidedversuslandmarkcorticosteroidinjectioninthetreatmentofshoulderpainanupdate AT yehiaradwam systematicreviewandmetaanalysisontheeffectivenessofultrasoundguidedversuslandmarkcorticosteroidinjectioninthetreatmentofshoulderpainanupdate AT ashourahmeda systematicreviewandmetaanalysisontheeffectivenessofultrasoundguidedversuslandmarkcorticosteroidinjectioninthetreatmentofshoulderpainanupdate |