Cargando…

Systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided versus landmark corticosteroid injection in the treatment of shoulder pain: an update

BACKGROUND: Corticosteroid (CS) can be injected in a blind fashion (landmark-guided) or with ultrasound (US) guidance, and this may contribute to varying clinical results. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of US-guided versus landmark CS injections in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: ElMeligie, Mohamed Magdy, Allam, Nashwa M., Yehia, Radwa M., Ashour, Ahmed A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2022
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10468470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35524038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40477-022-00684-1
_version_ 1785099243557486592
author ElMeligie, Mohamed Magdy
Allam, Nashwa M.
Yehia, Radwa M.
Ashour, Ahmed A.
author_facet ElMeligie, Mohamed Magdy
Allam, Nashwa M.
Yehia, Radwa M.
Ashour, Ahmed A.
author_sort ElMeligie, Mohamed Magdy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Corticosteroid (CS) can be injected in a blind fashion (landmark-guided) or with ultrasound (US) guidance, and this may contribute to varying clinical results. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of US-guided versus landmark CS injections in the treatment of adult patients with shoulder pain. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE (via PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science, EBSCO, and Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing US-guided versus landmark CS injection regarding visual analogue scale (VAS), functional scores, disability scores, abduction degree, and side effects. The data were pooled as mean difference (MD), standardized mean difference (SMD), or risk ratios (RRs), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), using R software (meta package 4.9-0) for windows. Subgroup analysis and leave-one-out analysis were conducted. RESULTS: Eighteen RCTs, with a total of 1010 patients, were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled estimate favored the US-guided over landmark CS injection in terms of the mean change of VAS between 6 weeks and baseline (SMD = − 0.48, 95% CI [− 0.79, − 0.17]), the shoulder functional scores (SMD = 0.35, 95% CI [0.05, 0.65]) and shoulder abduction degree (MD = 8.78, 95% CI [3.11, 14.46]). Whilst no significant difference was found between the compared group regarding the overall shoulder disability scores (SMD = − 0.51, 95% CI (− 1.25, 0.22]) and side effects (RR = 0.45, 95% CI [0.15, 1.34]). None of the eligible study analyzed the cost-effectiveness of the US-guided method compared with the landmark method for CS injection. CONCLUSION: Our analysis showed that US-guided CS injection was effective in the treatment of various shoulder diseases. Further research on the cost-effectiveness of US-guided CS methods is needed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40477-022-00684-1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10468470
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2022
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104684702023-09-01 Systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided versus landmark corticosteroid injection in the treatment of shoulder pain: an update ElMeligie, Mohamed Magdy Allam, Nashwa M. Yehia, Radwa M. Ashour, Ahmed A. J Ultrasound Review Paper BACKGROUND: Corticosteroid (CS) can be injected in a blind fashion (landmark-guided) or with ultrasound (US) guidance, and this may contribute to varying clinical results. We conducted this systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the effectiveness of US-guided versus landmark CS injections in the treatment of adult patients with shoulder pain. METHODS: We searched MEDLINE (via PubMed), Scopus, Web of Science, EBSCO, and Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing US-guided versus landmark CS injection regarding visual analogue scale (VAS), functional scores, disability scores, abduction degree, and side effects. The data were pooled as mean difference (MD), standardized mean difference (SMD), or risk ratios (RRs), with 95% confidence intervals (CIs), using R software (meta package 4.9-0) for windows. Subgroup analysis and leave-one-out analysis were conducted. RESULTS: Eighteen RCTs, with a total of 1010 patients, were included in this meta-analysis. The pooled estimate favored the US-guided over landmark CS injection in terms of the mean change of VAS between 6 weeks and baseline (SMD = − 0.48, 95% CI [− 0.79, − 0.17]), the shoulder functional scores (SMD = 0.35, 95% CI [0.05, 0.65]) and shoulder abduction degree (MD = 8.78, 95% CI [3.11, 14.46]). Whilst no significant difference was found between the compared group regarding the overall shoulder disability scores (SMD = − 0.51, 95% CI (− 1.25, 0.22]) and side effects (RR = 0.45, 95% CI [0.15, 1.34]). None of the eligible study analyzed the cost-effectiveness of the US-guided method compared with the landmark method for CS injection. CONCLUSION: Our analysis showed that US-guided CS injection was effective in the treatment of various shoulder diseases. Further research on the cost-effectiveness of US-guided CS methods is needed. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40477-022-00684-1. Springer International Publishing 2022-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10468470/ /pubmed/35524038 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40477-022-00684-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2022 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visithttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Review Paper
ElMeligie, Mohamed Magdy
Allam, Nashwa M.
Yehia, Radwa M.
Ashour, Ahmed A.
Systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided versus landmark corticosteroid injection in the treatment of shoulder pain: an update
title Systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided versus landmark corticosteroid injection in the treatment of shoulder pain: an update
title_full Systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided versus landmark corticosteroid injection in the treatment of shoulder pain: an update
title_fullStr Systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided versus landmark corticosteroid injection in the treatment of shoulder pain: an update
title_full_unstemmed Systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided versus landmark corticosteroid injection in the treatment of shoulder pain: an update
title_short Systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided versus landmark corticosteroid injection in the treatment of shoulder pain: an update
title_sort systematic review and meta-analysis on the effectiveness of ultrasound-guided versus landmark corticosteroid injection in the treatment of shoulder pain: an update
topic Review Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10468470/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/35524038
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40477-022-00684-1
work_keys_str_mv AT elmeligiemohamedmagdy systematicreviewandmetaanalysisontheeffectivenessofultrasoundguidedversuslandmarkcorticosteroidinjectioninthetreatmentofshoulderpainanupdate
AT allamnashwam systematicreviewandmetaanalysisontheeffectivenessofultrasoundguidedversuslandmarkcorticosteroidinjectioninthetreatmentofshoulderpainanupdate
AT yehiaradwam systematicreviewandmetaanalysisontheeffectivenessofultrasoundguidedversuslandmarkcorticosteroidinjectioninthetreatmentofshoulderpainanupdate
AT ashourahmeda systematicreviewandmetaanalysisontheeffectivenessofultrasoundguidedversuslandmarkcorticosteroidinjectioninthetreatmentofshoulderpainanupdate