Cargando…

Explainable Image Quality Assessments in Teledermatological Photography

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Image quality is a crucial factor in the effectiveness and efficiency of teledermatological consultations. However, up to 50% of images sent by patients have quality issues, thus increasing the time to diagnosis and treatment. An automated, easily deployable, explainable m...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jalaboi, Raluca, Winther, Ole, Galimzianova, Alfiia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10468541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36735575
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2022.0405
_version_ 1785099258111721472
author Jalaboi, Raluca
Winther, Ole
Galimzianova, Alfiia
author_facet Jalaboi, Raluca
Winther, Ole
Galimzianova, Alfiia
author_sort Jalaboi, Raluca
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Image quality is a crucial factor in the effectiveness and efficiency of teledermatological consultations. However, up to 50% of images sent by patients have quality issues, thus increasing the time to diagnosis and treatment. An automated, easily deployable, explainable method for assessing image quality is necessary to improve the current teledermatological consultation flow. We introduce ImageQX, a convolutional neural network for image quality assessment with a learning mechanism for identifying the most common poor image quality explanations: bad framing, bad lighting, blur, low resolution, and distance issues. METHODS: ImageQX was trained on 26,635 photographs and validated on 9,874 photographs, each annotated with image quality labels and poor image quality explanations by up to 12 board-certified dermatologists. The photographic images were taken between 2017 and 2019 using a mobile skin disease tracking application accessible worldwide. RESULTS: Our method achieves expert-level performance for both image quality assessment and poor image quality explanation. For image quality assessment, ImageQX obtains a macro F1-score of 0.73 ± 0.01, which places it within standard deviation of the pairwise inter-rater F1-score of 0.77 ± 0.07. For poor image quality explanations, our method obtains F1-scores of between 0.37 ± 0.01 and 0.70 ± 0.01, similar to the inter-rater pairwise F1-score of between 0.24 ± 0.15 and 0.83 ± 0.06. Moreover, with a size of only 15 MB, ImageQX is easily deployable on mobile devices. CONCLUSION: With an image quality detection performance similar to that of dermatologists, incorporating ImageQX into the teledermatology flow can enable a better, faster flow for remote consultations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10468541
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104685412023-09-01 Explainable Image Quality Assessments in Teledermatological Photography Jalaboi, Raluca Winther, Ole Galimzianova, Alfiia Telemed J E Health Original Research BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Image quality is a crucial factor in the effectiveness and efficiency of teledermatological consultations. However, up to 50% of images sent by patients have quality issues, thus increasing the time to diagnosis and treatment. An automated, easily deployable, explainable method for assessing image quality is necessary to improve the current teledermatological consultation flow. We introduce ImageQX, a convolutional neural network for image quality assessment with a learning mechanism for identifying the most common poor image quality explanations: bad framing, bad lighting, blur, low resolution, and distance issues. METHODS: ImageQX was trained on 26,635 photographs and validated on 9,874 photographs, each annotated with image quality labels and poor image quality explanations by up to 12 board-certified dermatologists. The photographic images were taken between 2017 and 2019 using a mobile skin disease tracking application accessible worldwide. RESULTS: Our method achieves expert-level performance for both image quality assessment and poor image quality explanation. For image quality assessment, ImageQX obtains a macro F1-score of 0.73 ± 0.01, which places it within standard deviation of the pairwise inter-rater F1-score of 0.77 ± 0.07. For poor image quality explanations, our method obtains F1-scores of between 0.37 ± 0.01 and 0.70 ± 0.01, similar to the inter-rater pairwise F1-score of between 0.24 ± 0.15 and 0.83 ± 0.06. Moreover, with a size of only 15 MB, ImageQX is easily deployable on mobile devices. CONCLUSION: With an image quality detection performance similar to that of dermatologists, incorporating ImageQX into the teledermatology flow can enable a better, faster flow for remote consultations. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2023-09-01 2023-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10468541/ /pubmed/36735575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2022.0405 Text en © Raluca Jalaboi et al. 2023; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License [CC-BY] (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Jalaboi, Raluca
Winther, Ole
Galimzianova, Alfiia
Explainable Image Quality Assessments in Teledermatological Photography
title Explainable Image Quality Assessments in Teledermatological Photography
title_full Explainable Image Quality Assessments in Teledermatological Photography
title_fullStr Explainable Image Quality Assessments in Teledermatological Photography
title_full_unstemmed Explainable Image Quality Assessments in Teledermatological Photography
title_short Explainable Image Quality Assessments in Teledermatological Photography
title_sort explainable image quality assessments in teledermatological photography
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10468541/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36735575
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2022.0405
work_keys_str_mv AT jalaboiraluca explainableimagequalityassessmentsinteledermatologicalphotography
AT wintherole explainableimagequalityassessmentsinteledermatologicalphotography
AT galimzianovaalfiia explainableimagequalityassessmentsinteledermatologicalphotography