Cargando…
Explainable Image Quality Assessments in Teledermatological Photography
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Image quality is a crucial factor in the effectiveness and efficiency of teledermatological consultations. However, up to 50% of images sent by patients have quality issues, thus increasing the time to diagnosis and treatment. An automated, easily deployable, explainable m...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10468541/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36735575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2022.0405 |
_version_ | 1785099258111721472 |
---|---|
author | Jalaboi, Raluca Winther, Ole Galimzianova, Alfiia |
author_facet | Jalaboi, Raluca Winther, Ole Galimzianova, Alfiia |
author_sort | Jalaboi, Raluca |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Image quality is a crucial factor in the effectiveness and efficiency of teledermatological consultations. However, up to 50% of images sent by patients have quality issues, thus increasing the time to diagnosis and treatment. An automated, easily deployable, explainable method for assessing image quality is necessary to improve the current teledermatological consultation flow. We introduce ImageQX, a convolutional neural network for image quality assessment with a learning mechanism for identifying the most common poor image quality explanations: bad framing, bad lighting, blur, low resolution, and distance issues. METHODS: ImageQX was trained on 26,635 photographs and validated on 9,874 photographs, each annotated with image quality labels and poor image quality explanations by up to 12 board-certified dermatologists. The photographic images were taken between 2017 and 2019 using a mobile skin disease tracking application accessible worldwide. RESULTS: Our method achieves expert-level performance for both image quality assessment and poor image quality explanation. For image quality assessment, ImageQX obtains a macro F1-score of 0.73 ± 0.01, which places it within standard deviation of the pairwise inter-rater F1-score of 0.77 ± 0.07. For poor image quality explanations, our method obtains F1-scores of between 0.37 ± 0.01 and 0.70 ± 0.01, similar to the inter-rater pairwise F1-score of between 0.24 ± 0.15 and 0.83 ± 0.06. Moreover, with a size of only 15 MB, ImageQX is easily deployable on mobile devices. CONCLUSION: With an image quality detection performance similar to that of dermatologists, incorporating ImageQX into the teledermatology flow can enable a better, faster flow for remote consultations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10468541 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104685412023-09-01 Explainable Image Quality Assessments in Teledermatological Photography Jalaboi, Raluca Winther, Ole Galimzianova, Alfiia Telemed J E Health Original Research BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Image quality is a crucial factor in the effectiveness and efficiency of teledermatological consultations. However, up to 50% of images sent by patients have quality issues, thus increasing the time to diagnosis and treatment. An automated, easily deployable, explainable method for assessing image quality is necessary to improve the current teledermatological consultation flow. We introduce ImageQX, a convolutional neural network for image quality assessment with a learning mechanism for identifying the most common poor image quality explanations: bad framing, bad lighting, blur, low resolution, and distance issues. METHODS: ImageQX was trained on 26,635 photographs and validated on 9,874 photographs, each annotated with image quality labels and poor image quality explanations by up to 12 board-certified dermatologists. The photographic images were taken between 2017 and 2019 using a mobile skin disease tracking application accessible worldwide. RESULTS: Our method achieves expert-level performance for both image quality assessment and poor image quality explanation. For image quality assessment, ImageQX obtains a macro F1-score of 0.73 ± 0.01, which places it within standard deviation of the pairwise inter-rater F1-score of 0.77 ± 0.07. For poor image quality explanations, our method obtains F1-scores of between 0.37 ± 0.01 and 0.70 ± 0.01, similar to the inter-rater pairwise F1-score of between 0.24 ± 0.15 and 0.83 ± 0.06. Moreover, with a size of only 15 MB, ImageQX is easily deployable on mobile devices. CONCLUSION: With an image quality detection performance similar to that of dermatologists, incorporating ImageQX into the teledermatology flow can enable a better, faster flow for remote consultations. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2023-09-01 2023-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC10468541/ /pubmed/36735575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2022.0405 Text en © Raluca Jalaboi et al. 2023; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License [CC-BY] (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Jalaboi, Raluca Winther, Ole Galimzianova, Alfiia Explainable Image Quality Assessments in Teledermatological Photography |
title | Explainable Image Quality Assessments in Teledermatological Photography |
title_full | Explainable Image Quality Assessments in Teledermatological Photography |
title_fullStr | Explainable Image Quality Assessments in Teledermatological Photography |
title_full_unstemmed | Explainable Image Quality Assessments in Teledermatological Photography |
title_short | Explainable Image Quality Assessments in Teledermatological Photography |
title_sort | explainable image quality assessments in teledermatological photography |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10468541/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/36735575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2022.0405 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jalaboiraluca explainableimagequalityassessmentsinteledermatologicalphotography AT wintherole explainableimagequalityassessmentsinteledermatologicalphotography AT galimzianovaalfiia explainableimagequalityassessmentsinteledermatologicalphotography |