Cargando…

Fertility preservation in male cancer patients. Counseling and reproductive outcomes

Introduction: Advances in cancer treatments have determined an increase in survival rates. However, these lifesaving therapies may have a negative impact on reproductive health. To diminish the infertility risk; different fertility preservation strategies have been designed. Sperm freezing is the go...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kimelman, Dana, Torrens, Andrea, Bonelli, Carla, Sapiro, Rossana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10468982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37664467
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2023.1240152
_version_ 1785099344171499520
author Kimelman, Dana
Torrens, Andrea
Bonelli, Carla
Sapiro, Rossana
author_facet Kimelman, Dana
Torrens, Andrea
Bonelli, Carla
Sapiro, Rossana
author_sort Kimelman, Dana
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Advances in cancer treatments have determined an increase in survival rates. However, these lifesaving therapies may have a negative impact on reproductive health. To diminish the infertility risk; different fertility preservation strategies have been designed. Sperm freezing is the gold standard fertility preservation method in the case of post-pubertal men. The main objective of this study is to evaluate the fertility status of Uruguayan male cancer survivors who have gone through sperm freezing, as well as to assess oncofertility counseling received by these patients. Methods: This is a descriptive, cross-sectional, observational, and transversal study. A survey was conducted on male cancer survivors who cryopreserved sperm between 1985 and 2021 in “Reprovita Lab and Biobank” which is the only sperm bank in this country. Results: One hundred thirty-five participants answered the survey. At the time of diagnosis, the mean age of patients was 28.8 ± 6.4 years old. Testicular was the most frequent type of cancer (64%). Only, 12% (n = 15) already had children at the time of diagnosis. Among the interviewed survivors, 50% (n = 62) attempted to conceive after cancer treatment, and 68% (n = 42) achieved natural pregnancy. Patients who did not achieve spontaneous conception (n = 11), used their cryopreserved samples, and 45.4% achieved pregnancy. About 86% (n = 107) of survivors believed that the timing of oncofertility referrals was appropriate and 97% considered that having the possibility of protecting their fertility was very important. Eighty percent (n = 101), were advised by their attending physicians, 14% (n = 18) sought advice from family members or friends, and 4% (n = 5) from oncofertility specialists. Discussion: To our knowledge, this is the first study evaluating the reproductive outcomes of male cancer survivors in our country and the region. Most of the interviewed survivors considered fertility preservation as a positive initiative, independent of their reproductive outcomes, reflecting the importance of fertility preservation counseling as one of the most important aspects for futurequality of life of young cancer patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10468982
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104689822023-09-01 Fertility preservation in male cancer patients. Counseling and reproductive outcomes Kimelman, Dana Torrens, Andrea Bonelli, Carla Sapiro, Rossana Front Cell Dev Biol Cell and Developmental Biology Introduction: Advances in cancer treatments have determined an increase in survival rates. However, these lifesaving therapies may have a negative impact on reproductive health. To diminish the infertility risk; different fertility preservation strategies have been designed. Sperm freezing is the gold standard fertility preservation method in the case of post-pubertal men. The main objective of this study is to evaluate the fertility status of Uruguayan male cancer survivors who have gone through sperm freezing, as well as to assess oncofertility counseling received by these patients. Methods: This is a descriptive, cross-sectional, observational, and transversal study. A survey was conducted on male cancer survivors who cryopreserved sperm between 1985 and 2021 in “Reprovita Lab and Biobank” which is the only sperm bank in this country. Results: One hundred thirty-five participants answered the survey. At the time of diagnosis, the mean age of patients was 28.8 ± 6.4 years old. Testicular was the most frequent type of cancer (64%). Only, 12% (n = 15) already had children at the time of diagnosis. Among the interviewed survivors, 50% (n = 62) attempted to conceive after cancer treatment, and 68% (n = 42) achieved natural pregnancy. Patients who did not achieve spontaneous conception (n = 11), used their cryopreserved samples, and 45.4% achieved pregnancy. About 86% (n = 107) of survivors believed that the timing of oncofertility referrals was appropriate and 97% considered that having the possibility of protecting their fertility was very important. Eighty percent (n = 101), were advised by their attending physicians, 14% (n = 18) sought advice from family members or friends, and 4% (n = 5) from oncofertility specialists. Discussion: To our knowledge, this is the first study evaluating the reproductive outcomes of male cancer survivors in our country and the region. Most of the interviewed survivors considered fertility preservation as a positive initiative, independent of their reproductive outcomes, reflecting the importance of fertility preservation counseling as one of the most important aspects for futurequality of life of young cancer patients. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10468982/ /pubmed/37664467 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2023.1240152 Text en Copyright © 2023 Kimelman, Torrens, Bonelli and Sapiro. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Cell and Developmental Biology
Kimelman, Dana
Torrens, Andrea
Bonelli, Carla
Sapiro, Rossana
Fertility preservation in male cancer patients. Counseling and reproductive outcomes
title Fertility preservation in male cancer patients. Counseling and reproductive outcomes
title_full Fertility preservation in male cancer patients. Counseling and reproductive outcomes
title_fullStr Fertility preservation in male cancer patients. Counseling and reproductive outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Fertility preservation in male cancer patients. Counseling and reproductive outcomes
title_short Fertility preservation in male cancer patients. Counseling and reproductive outcomes
title_sort fertility preservation in male cancer patients. counseling and reproductive outcomes
topic Cell and Developmental Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10468982/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37664467
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fcell.2023.1240152
work_keys_str_mv AT kimelmandana fertilitypreservationinmalecancerpatientscounselingandreproductiveoutcomes
AT torrensandrea fertilitypreservationinmalecancerpatientscounselingandreproductiveoutcomes
AT bonellicarla fertilitypreservationinmalecancerpatientscounselingandreproductiveoutcomes
AT sapirorossana fertilitypreservationinmalecancerpatientscounselingandreproductiveoutcomes