Cargando…
Experimental validation of rotating detonation for rocket propulsion
Space travel requires high-powered, efficient rocket propulsion systems for controllable launch vehicles and safe planetary entry. Interplanetary travel will rely on energy-dense propellants to produce thrust via combustion as the heat generation process to convert chemical to thermal energy. In pro...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10469202/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37648704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40156-y |
_version_ | 1785099390520655872 |
---|---|
author | Bennewitz, John W. Burr, Jason R. Bigler, Blaine R. Burke, Robert F. Lemcherfi, Aaron Mundt, Tyler Rezzag, Taha Plaehn, Ethan W. Sosa, Jonathan Walters, Ian V. Schumaker, S. Alexander Ahmed, Kareem A. Slabaugh, Carson D. Knowlen, Carl Hargus, William A. |
author_facet | Bennewitz, John W. Burr, Jason R. Bigler, Blaine R. Burke, Robert F. Lemcherfi, Aaron Mundt, Tyler Rezzag, Taha Plaehn, Ethan W. Sosa, Jonathan Walters, Ian V. Schumaker, S. Alexander Ahmed, Kareem A. Slabaugh, Carson D. Knowlen, Carl Hargus, William A. |
author_sort | Bennewitz, John W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Space travel requires high-powered, efficient rocket propulsion systems for controllable launch vehicles and safe planetary entry. Interplanetary travel will rely on energy-dense propellants to produce thrust via combustion as the heat generation process to convert chemical to thermal energy. In propulsion devices, combustion can occur through deflagration or detonation, each having vastly different characteristics. Deflagration is subsonic burning at effectively constant pressure and is the main means of thermal energy generation in modern rockets. Alternatively, detonation is a supersonic combustion-driven shock offering several advantages. Detonations entail compact heat release zones at elevated local pressure and temperature. Specifically, rotating detonation rocket engines (RDREs) use detonation as the primary means of energy conversion, producing more useful available work compared to equivalent deflagration-based devices; detonation-based combustion is poised to radically improve rocket performance compared to today’s constant pressure engines, producing up to 10[Formula: see text] increased thrust. This new propulsion cycle will also reduce thruster size and/or weight, lower injection pressures, and are less susceptible to engine-damaging acoustic instabilities. Here we present a collective effort to benchmark performance and standardize operability of rotating detonation rocket engines to develop the RDRE technology readiness level towards a flight demonstration. Key detonation physics unique to RDREs, driving consistency and control of chamber dynamics across the engine operating envelope, are identified and addressed to drive down the variability and stochasticity observed in previous studies. This effort demonstrates an RDRE operating consistently across multiple facilities, validating this technology’s performance as the foundation of RDRE architecture for future aerospace applications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10469202 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104692022023-09-01 Experimental validation of rotating detonation for rocket propulsion Bennewitz, John W. Burr, Jason R. Bigler, Blaine R. Burke, Robert F. Lemcherfi, Aaron Mundt, Tyler Rezzag, Taha Plaehn, Ethan W. Sosa, Jonathan Walters, Ian V. Schumaker, S. Alexander Ahmed, Kareem A. Slabaugh, Carson D. Knowlen, Carl Hargus, William A. Sci Rep Article Space travel requires high-powered, efficient rocket propulsion systems for controllable launch vehicles and safe planetary entry. Interplanetary travel will rely on energy-dense propellants to produce thrust via combustion as the heat generation process to convert chemical to thermal energy. In propulsion devices, combustion can occur through deflagration or detonation, each having vastly different characteristics. Deflagration is subsonic burning at effectively constant pressure and is the main means of thermal energy generation in modern rockets. Alternatively, detonation is a supersonic combustion-driven shock offering several advantages. Detonations entail compact heat release zones at elevated local pressure and temperature. Specifically, rotating detonation rocket engines (RDREs) use detonation as the primary means of energy conversion, producing more useful available work compared to equivalent deflagration-based devices; detonation-based combustion is poised to radically improve rocket performance compared to today’s constant pressure engines, producing up to 10[Formula: see text] increased thrust. This new propulsion cycle will also reduce thruster size and/or weight, lower injection pressures, and are less susceptible to engine-damaging acoustic instabilities. Here we present a collective effort to benchmark performance and standardize operability of rotating detonation rocket engines to develop the RDRE technology readiness level towards a flight demonstration. Key detonation physics unique to RDREs, driving consistency and control of chamber dynamics across the engine operating envelope, are identified and addressed to drive down the variability and stochasticity observed in previous studies. This effort demonstrates an RDRE operating consistently across multiple facilities, validating this technology’s performance as the foundation of RDRE architecture for future aerospace applications. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10469202/ /pubmed/37648704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40156-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Bennewitz, John W. Burr, Jason R. Bigler, Blaine R. Burke, Robert F. Lemcherfi, Aaron Mundt, Tyler Rezzag, Taha Plaehn, Ethan W. Sosa, Jonathan Walters, Ian V. Schumaker, S. Alexander Ahmed, Kareem A. Slabaugh, Carson D. Knowlen, Carl Hargus, William A. Experimental validation of rotating detonation for rocket propulsion |
title | Experimental validation of rotating detonation for rocket propulsion |
title_full | Experimental validation of rotating detonation for rocket propulsion |
title_fullStr | Experimental validation of rotating detonation for rocket propulsion |
title_full_unstemmed | Experimental validation of rotating detonation for rocket propulsion |
title_short | Experimental validation of rotating detonation for rocket propulsion |
title_sort | experimental validation of rotating detonation for rocket propulsion |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10469202/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37648704 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40156-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bennewitzjohnw experimentalvalidationofrotatingdetonationforrocketpropulsion AT burrjasonr experimentalvalidationofrotatingdetonationforrocketpropulsion AT biglerblainer experimentalvalidationofrotatingdetonationforrocketpropulsion AT burkerobertf experimentalvalidationofrotatingdetonationforrocketpropulsion AT lemcherfiaaron experimentalvalidationofrotatingdetonationforrocketpropulsion AT mundttyler experimentalvalidationofrotatingdetonationforrocketpropulsion AT rezzagtaha experimentalvalidationofrotatingdetonationforrocketpropulsion AT plaehnethanw experimentalvalidationofrotatingdetonationforrocketpropulsion AT sosajonathan experimentalvalidationofrotatingdetonationforrocketpropulsion AT waltersianv experimentalvalidationofrotatingdetonationforrocketpropulsion AT schumakersalexander experimentalvalidationofrotatingdetonationforrocketpropulsion AT ahmedkareema experimentalvalidationofrotatingdetonationforrocketpropulsion AT slabaughcarsond experimentalvalidationofrotatingdetonationforrocketpropulsion AT knowlencarl experimentalvalidationofrotatingdetonationforrocketpropulsion AT harguswilliama experimentalvalidationofrotatingdetonationforrocketpropulsion |