Cargando…

Ilizarov technique in the treatment of bone defects of the radius and ulna: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE: The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy of the Ilizarov method in the treatment of radius and ulna bone defects. METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Ovid MEDLINE, and Scopus databases were searched for articles publishe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hamiti, Yimurang, Yalikun, Ainizier, Lu, Cheng, Yusufu, Aihemaitijiang, Yushan, Maimaiaili
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10469416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37649069
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04126-4
_version_ 1785099435379785728
author Hamiti, Yimurang
Yalikun, Ainizier
Lu, Cheng
Yusufu, Aihemaitijiang
Yushan, Maimaiaili
author_facet Hamiti, Yimurang
Yalikun, Ainizier
Lu, Cheng
Yusufu, Aihemaitijiang
Yushan, Maimaiaili
author_sort Hamiti, Yimurang
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy of the Ilizarov method in the treatment of radius and ulna bone defects. METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Ovid MEDLINE, and Scopus databases were searched for articles published up to May 2023. The quality of the studies was evaluated using a modified version of the Newcastle–Ottawa scale. The effect size and confidence intervals at 95% for the main results were calculated. The heterogeneity was evaluated. The demographic data, defect size (DS), external fixation time (EFT), external fixation index (EFI), and complications were extracted and analyzed using the Stata version 16. RESULTS: This meta-analysis identified and included seven studies involving 98 patients. The union rate of 100% was reported in all studies. According to the findings of the single-arm meta-analysis, the pooled DS was 3.42 cm (95% CI [2.64, 4.21], I(2) = 53.5%, P = 0.045), EFT was 148.43 days (95% CI [97.49, 199.38], I(2) = 91.9%, P = 0.000), and EFI was 41.32 days/cm (95% CI [35.72, 46.91], I(2) = 62.2%, P = 0.021). Pin tract infection was the most common complication, as reported in six studies. CONCLUSION: The findings of the present meta-analysis indicate that the Ilizarov technique is a successful treatment option for bone defects in the radius and ulna. This method has demonstrated efficacy in achieving expected clinical outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-023-04126-4.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10469416
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104694162023-09-01 Ilizarov technique in the treatment of bone defects of the radius and ulna: a systematic review and meta-analysis Hamiti, Yimurang Yalikun, Ainizier Lu, Cheng Yusufu, Aihemaitijiang Yushan, Maimaiaili J Orthop Surg Res Systematic Review PURPOSE: The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy of the Ilizarov method in the treatment of radius and ulna bone defects. METHODS: The PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Ovid MEDLINE, and Scopus databases were searched for articles published up to May 2023. The quality of the studies was evaluated using a modified version of the Newcastle–Ottawa scale. The effect size and confidence intervals at 95% for the main results were calculated. The heterogeneity was evaluated. The demographic data, defect size (DS), external fixation time (EFT), external fixation index (EFI), and complications were extracted and analyzed using the Stata version 16. RESULTS: This meta-analysis identified and included seven studies involving 98 patients. The union rate of 100% was reported in all studies. According to the findings of the single-arm meta-analysis, the pooled DS was 3.42 cm (95% CI [2.64, 4.21], I(2) = 53.5%, P = 0.045), EFT was 148.43 days (95% CI [97.49, 199.38], I(2) = 91.9%, P = 0.000), and EFI was 41.32 days/cm (95% CI [35.72, 46.91], I(2) = 62.2%, P = 0.021). Pin tract infection was the most common complication, as reported in six studies. CONCLUSION: The findings of the present meta-analysis indicate that the Ilizarov technique is a successful treatment option for bone defects in the radius and ulna. This method has demonstrated efficacy in achieving expected clinical outcomes. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13018-023-04126-4. BioMed Central 2023-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10469416/ /pubmed/37649069 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04126-4 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Systematic Review
Hamiti, Yimurang
Yalikun, Ainizier
Lu, Cheng
Yusufu, Aihemaitijiang
Yushan, Maimaiaili
Ilizarov technique in the treatment of bone defects of the radius and ulna: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title Ilizarov technique in the treatment of bone defects of the radius and ulna: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full Ilizarov technique in the treatment of bone defects of the radius and ulna: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Ilizarov technique in the treatment of bone defects of the radius and ulna: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Ilizarov technique in the treatment of bone defects of the radius and ulna: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short Ilizarov technique in the treatment of bone defects of the radius and ulna: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort ilizarov technique in the treatment of bone defects of the radius and ulna: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Systematic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10469416/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37649069
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13018-023-04126-4
work_keys_str_mv AT hamitiyimurang ilizarovtechniqueinthetreatmentofbonedefectsoftheradiusandulnaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yalikunainizier ilizarovtechniqueinthetreatmentofbonedefectsoftheradiusandulnaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lucheng ilizarovtechniqueinthetreatmentofbonedefectsoftheradiusandulnaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yusufuaihemaitijiang ilizarovtechniqueinthetreatmentofbonedefectsoftheradiusandulnaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yushanmaimaiaili ilizarovtechniqueinthetreatmentofbonedefectsoftheradiusandulnaasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis