Cargando…

Children’s eating attitudes test (ChEAT): validation and reliability in Turkish children

OBJECTIVES: This study aims to examine the validity and reliability of the children’s eating attitudes test (ChEAT) in Turkish children. METHODS: The participants were 331 children (137 boys and 194 girls, ages 8–15). Data was collected through face-to-face interviews using a questionnaire containin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bozkurt, Osman, Kocaadam-Bozkurt, Betul, Köksal, Eda, Özalp Ateş, Funda Seher
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10469453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37649120
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40337-023-00811-1
_version_ 1785099444122812416
author Bozkurt, Osman
Kocaadam-Bozkurt, Betul
Köksal, Eda
Özalp Ateş, Funda Seher
author_facet Bozkurt, Osman
Kocaadam-Bozkurt, Betul
Köksal, Eda
Özalp Ateş, Funda Seher
author_sort Bozkurt, Osman
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: This study aims to examine the validity and reliability of the children’s eating attitudes test (ChEAT) in Turkish children. METHODS: The participants were 331 children (137 boys and 194 girls, ages 8–15). Data was collected through face-to-face interviews using a questionnaire containing socio-demographic characteristics, the ChEAT, and the children's eating behaviour questionnaire (CEBQ). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed to determine the factor structure of the Turkish version of the ChEAT. Additionally, the reliability was examined in terms of internal consistency and test–retest reliability. All statistical analyses were performed using Mplus Trial Version and SPSS 11.5 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). RESULTS: According to the goodness-of-fit statistic, a three-factor solution was appropriate and compatible with clinical considerations. The three factors explained 50.1% of the variance. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.75 for ChEAT-26, 0.67 for “Preoccupation with thinness and food”, 0.63 for “Social pressure to eat”, and 0.71 for “Dieting”. Furthermore, the test–retest reliability was 0.72, 0.62, 0.59, and 0.59 respectively. Statistically significant correlations between the ChEAT and CEBQ were found (p < 0.05). “Preoccupation with thinness and food” was significantly higher in obese children (p < 0.05), while “Social pressure to eat” was lower (p < 0.001). Sex, grade, BMI, parental education in addition to working status affected the ChEAT-26 scores. CONCLUSIONS: The present study has provided preliminary evidence for the validity and reliability of a Turkish version of the ChEAT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10469453
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104694532023-09-01 Children’s eating attitudes test (ChEAT): validation and reliability in Turkish children Bozkurt, Osman Kocaadam-Bozkurt, Betul Köksal, Eda Özalp Ateş, Funda Seher J Eat Disord Research OBJECTIVES: This study aims to examine the validity and reliability of the children’s eating attitudes test (ChEAT) in Turkish children. METHODS: The participants were 331 children (137 boys and 194 girls, ages 8–15). Data was collected through face-to-face interviews using a questionnaire containing socio-demographic characteristics, the ChEAT, and the children's eating behaviour questionnaire (CEBQ). Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was performed to determine the factor structure of the Turkish version of the ChEAT. Additionally, the reliability was examined in terms of internal consistency and test–retest reliability. All statistical analyses were performed using Mplus Trial Version and SPSS 11.5 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA). RESULTS: According to the goodness-of-fit statistic, a three-factor solution was appropriate and compatible with clinical considerations. The three factors explained 50.1% of the variance. Cronbach’s alpha coefficient was 0.75 for ChEAT-26, 0.67 for “Preoccupation with thinness and food”, 0.63 for “Social pressure to eat”, and 0.71 for “Dieting”. Furthermore, the test–retest reliability was 0.72, 0.62, 0.59, and 0.59 respectively. Statistically significant correlations between the ChEAT and CEBQ were found (p < 0.05). “Preoccupation with thinness and food” was significantly higher in obese children (p < 0.05), while “Social pressure to eat” was lower (p < 0.001). Sex, grade, BMI, parental education in addition to working status affected the ChEAT-26 scores. CONCLUSIONS: The present study has provided preliminary evidence for the validity and reliability of a Turkish version of the ChEAT. BioMed Central 2023-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10469453/ /pubmed/37649120 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40337-023-00811-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Bozkurt, Osman
Kocaadam-Bozkurt, Betul
Köksal, Eda
Özalp Ateş, Funda Seher
Children’s eating attitudes test (ChEAT): validation and reliability in Turkish children
title Children’s eating attitudes test (ChEAT): validation and reliability in Turkish children
title_full Children’s eating attitudes test (ChEAT): validation and reliability in Turkish children
title_fullStr Children’s eating attitudes test (ChEAT): validation and reliability in Turkish children
title_full_unstemmed Children’s eating attitudes test (ChEAT): validation and reliability in Turkish children
title_short Children’s eating attitudes test (ChEAT): validation and reliability in Turkish children
title_sort children’s eating attitudes test (cheat): validation and reliability in turkish children
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10469453/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37649120
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40337-023-00811-1
work_keys_str_mv AT bozkurtosman childrenseatingattitudestestcheatvalidationandreliabilityinturkishchildren
AT kocaadambozkurtbetul childrenseatingattitudestestcheatvalidationandreliabilityinturkishchildren
AT koksaleda childrenseatingattitudestestcheatvalidationandreliabilityinturkishchildren
AT ozalpatesfundaseher childrenseatingattitudestestcheatvalidationandreliabilityinturkishchildren