Cargando…

Clinical analysis of EV‐Fingerprint to predict grade group 3 and above prostate cancer and avoid prostate biopsy

BACKGROUND: There is an unmet clinical need for minimally invasive diagnostic tests to improve the detection of grade group (GG) ≥3 prostate cancer relative to prostate antigen‐specific risk calculators. We determined the accuracy of the blood‐based extracellular vesicle (EV) biomarker assay (EV Fin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fairey, Adrian, Paproski, Robert J., Pink, Desmond, Sosnowski, Deborah L., Vasquez, Catalina, Donnelly, Bryan, Hyndman, Eric, Aprikian, Armen, Kinnaird, Adam, Beatty, Perrin H., Lewis, John D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10469644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37329212
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6216
_version_ 1785099487526518784
author Fairey, Adrian
Paproski, Robert J.
Pink, Desmond
Sosnowski, Deborah L.
Vasquez, Catalina
Donnelly, Bryan
Hyndman, Eric
Aprikian, Armen
Kinnaird, Adam
Beatty, Perrin H.
Lewis, John D.
author_facet Fairey, Adrian
Paproski, Robert J.
Pink, Desmond
Sosnowski, Deborah L.
Vasquez, Catalina
Donnelly, Bryan
Hyndman, Eric
Aprikian, Armen
Kinnaird, Adam
Beatty, Perrin H.
Lewis, John D.
author_sort Fairey, Adrian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is an unmet clinical need for minimally invasive diagnostic tests to improve the detection of grade group (GG) ≥3 prostate cancer relative to prostate antigen‐specific risk calculators. We determined the accuracy of the blood‐based extracellular vesicle (EV) biomarker assay (EV Fingerprint test) at the point of a prostate biopsy decision to predict GG ≥3 from GG ≤2 and avoid unnecessary biopsies. METHODS: This study analyzed 415 men referred to urology clinics and scheduled for a prostate biopsy, were recruited to the APCaRI 01 prospective cohort study. The EV machine learning analysis platform was used to generate predictive EV models from microflow data. Logistic regression was then used to analyze the combined EV models and patient clinical data and generate the patients' risk score for GG ≥3 prostate cancer. RESULTS: The EV‐Fingerprint test was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) in discrimination of GG ≥3 from GG ≤2 and benign disease on initial biopsy. EV‐Fingerprint identified GG ≥3 cancer patients with high accuracy (0.81 AUC) at 95% sensitivity and 97% negative predictive value. Using a 7.85% probability cutoff, 95% of men with GG ≥3 would have been recommended a biopsy while avoiding 144 unnecessary biopsies (35%) and missing four GG ≥3 cancers (5%). Conversely, a 5% cutoff would have avoided 31 unnecessary biopsies (7%), missing no GG ≥3 cancers (0%). CONCLUSIONS: EV‐Fingerprint accurately predicted GG ≥3 prostate cancer and would have significantly reduced unnecessary prostate biopsies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10469644
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104696442023-09-01 Clinical analysis of EV‐Fingerprint to predict grade group 3 and above prostate cancer and avoid prostate biopsy Fairey, Adrian Paproski, Robert J. Pink, Desmond Sosnowski, Deborah L. Vasquez, Catalina Donnelly, Bryan Hyndman, Eric Aprikian, Armen Kinnaird, Adam Beatty, Perrin H. Lewis, John D. Cancer Med RESEARCH ARTICLES BACKGROUND: There is an unmet clinical need for minimally invasive diagnostic tests to improve the detection of grade group (GG) ≥3 prostate cancer relative to prostate antigen‐specific risk calculators. We determined the accuracy of the blood‐based extracellular vesicle (EV) biomarker assay (EV Fingerprint test) at the point of a prostate biopsy decision to predict GG ≥3 from GG ≤2 and avoid unnecessary biopsies. METHODS: This study analyzed 415 men referred to urology clinics and scheduled for a prostate biopsy, were recruited to the APCaRI 01 prospective cohort study. The EV machine learning analysis platform was used to generate predictive EV models from microflow data. Logistic regression was then used to analyze the combined EV models and patient clinical data and generate the patients' risk score for GG ≥3 prostate cancer. RESULTS: The EV‐Fingerprint test was evaluated using the area under the curve (AUC) in discrimination of GG ≥3 from GG ≤2 and benign disease on initial biopsy. EV‐Fingerprint identified GG ≥3 cancer patients with high accuracy (0.81 AUC) at 95% sensitivity and 97% negative predictive value. Using a 7.85% probability cutoff, 95% of men with GG ≥3 would have been recommended a biopsy while avoiding 144 unnecessary biopsies (35%) and missing four GG ≥3 cancers (5%). Conversely, a 5% cutoff would have avoided 31 unnecessary biopsies (7%), missing no GG ≥3 cancers (0%). CONCLUSIONS: EV‐Fingerprint accurately predicted GG ≥3 prostate cancer and would have significantly reduced unnecessary prostate biopsies. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-06-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10469644/ /pubmed/37329212 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6216 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle RESEARCH ARTICLES
Fairey, Adrian
Paproski, Robert J.
Pink, Desmond
Sosnowski, Deborah L.
Vasquez, Catalina
Donnelly, Bryan
Hyndman, Eric
Aprikian, Armen
Kinnaird, Adam
Beatty, Perrin H.
Lewis, John D.
Clinical analysis of EV‐Fingerprint to predict grade group 3 and above prostate cancer and avoid prostate biopsy
title Clinical analysis of EV‐Fingerprint to predict grade group 3 and above prostate cancer and avoid prostate biopsy
title_full Clinical analysis of EV‐Fingerprint to predict grade group 3 and above prostate cancer and avoid prostate biopsy
title_fullStr Clinical analysis of EV‐Fingerprint to predict grade group 3 and above prostate cancer and avoid prostate biopsy
title_full_unstemmed Clinical analysis of EV‐Fingerprint to predict grade group 3 and above prostate cancer and avoid prostate biopsy
title_short Clinical analysis of EV‐Fingerprint to predict grade group 3 and above prostate cancer and avoid prostate biopsy
title_sort clinical analysis of ev‐fingerprint to predict grade group 3 and above prostate cancer and avoid prostate biopsy
topic RESEARCH ARTICLES
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10469644/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37329212
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6216
work_keys_str_mv AT faireyadrian clinicalanalysisofevfingerprinttopredictgradegroup3andaboveprostatecancerandavoidprostatebiopsy
AT paproskirobertj clinicalanalysisofevfingerprinttopredictgradegroup3andaboveprostatecancerandavoidprostatebiopsy
AT pinkdesmond clinicalanalysisofevfingerprinttopredictgradegroup3andaboveprostatecancerandavoidprostatebiopsy
AT sosnowskideborahl clinicalanalysisofevfingerprinttopredictgradegroup3andaboveprostatecancerandavoidprostatebiopsy
AT vasquezcatalina clinicalanalysisofevfingerprinttopredictgradegroup3andaboveprostatecancerandavoidprostatebiopsy
AT donnellybryan clinicalanalysisofevfingerprinttopredictgradegroup3andaboveprostatecancerandavoidprostatebiopsy
AT hyndmaneric clinicalanalysisofevfingerprinttopredictgradegroup3andaboveprostatecancerandavoidprostatebiopsy
AT aprikianarmen clinicalanalysisofevfingerprinttopredictgradegroup3andaboveprostatecancerandavoidprostatebiopsy
AT kinnairdadam clinicalanalysisofevfingerprinttopredictgradegroup3andaboveprostatecancerandavoidprostatebiopsy
AT beattyperrinh clinicalanalysisofevfingerprinttopredictgradegroup3andaboveprostatecancerandavoidprostatebiopsy
AT lewisjohnd clinicalanalysisofevfingerprinttopredictgradegroup3andaboveprostatecancerandavoidprostatebiopsy