Cargando…
Adjustment of creatinine clearance for carboplatin dosing in Calvert's formula and clinical efficacy for lung cancer
BACKGROUND: The Cockcroft–Gault formula is commonly used as a substitute for glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in Calvert's formula for carboplatin dosing, where adjusting serum creatinine measured using the enzymatic method with 0.2 mg/dL has been suggested in Japan. However, the effects of the...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10469651/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37351560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6235 |
_version_ | 1785099489178025984 |
---|---|
author | Hatta, Takahiro Hase, Tetsunari Hara, Toru Kimura, Tomoki Kojima, Eiji Abe, Takashi Horio, Yoshitsugu Goto, Yasuhiro Ozawa, Naoya Yogo, Naoyuki Shibata, Hirofumi Shimokata, Tomoya Oguri, Tetsuya Yamamoto, Masashi Yanagisawa, Kiyoshi Ando, Masahiko Ando, Yuichi Kondo, Masashi Ishii, Makoto Hasegawa, Yoshinori |
author_facet | Hatta, Takahiro Hase, Tetsunari Hara, Toru Kimura, Tomoki Kojima, Eiji Abe, Takashi Horio, Yoshitsugu Goto, Yasuhiro Ozawa, Naoya Yogo, Naoyuki Shibata, Hirofumi Shimokata, Tomoya Oguri, Tetsuya Yamamoto, Masashi Yanagisawa, Kiyoshi Ando, Masahiko Ando, Yuichi Kondo, Masashi Ishii, Makoto Hasegawa, Yoshinori |
author_sort | Hatta, Takahiro |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Cockcroft–Gault formula is commonly used as a substitute for glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in Calvert's formula for carboplatin dosing, where adjusting serum creatinine measured using the enzymatic method with 0.2 mg/dL has been suggested in Japan. However, the effects of these adjustments on efficacy in patients with non‐small‐cell lung cancer remain unknown. METHODS: We conducted a post hoc analysis of the PREDICT1 study (CJLSG1201), a multicenter prospective observational trial of carboplatin–pemetrexed. Glomerular filtration rate values in Calvert's formula were back‐calculated from the administered dosages of carboplatin and the reported value of the target area under the curve. We estimated the serum creatinine adjustments and divided the patients into crude and adjusted groups. RESULTS: Patients in the crude group (N = 169) demonstrated similar efficacy to those in the adjusted group (N = 104) in progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR], 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76–1.35; p = 0.916 vs. HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.65–1.17; p = 0.363), with higher grade 3–4 hematologic toxicity. Among patients aged ≥75 years, the crude group (N = 47) showed superior efficacy compared with the adjusted group (N = 17) in PFS and OS (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.20–0.69; p = 0.002 vs. HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.23–0.82; p = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: Serum creatinine adjustment may be associated with similar efficacy compared to the crude serum creatinine value. In older patients, the adjustment should be cautiously applied owing to the potential for reduced efficacy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10469651 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104696512023-09-01 Adjustment of creatinine clearance for carboplatin dosing in Calvert's formula and clinical efficacy for lung cancer Hatta, Takahiro Hase, Tetsunari Hara, Toru Kimura, Tomoki Kojima, Eiji Abe, Takashi Horio, Yoshitsugu Goto, Yasuhiro Ozawa, Naoya Yogo, Naoyuki Shibata, Hirofumi Shimokata, Tomoya Oguri, Tetsuya Yamamoto, Masashi Yanagisawa, Kiyoshi Ando, Masahiko Ando, Yuichi Kondo, Masashi Ishii, Makoto Hasegawa, Yoshinori Cancer Med RESEARCH ARTICLES BACKGROUND: The Cockcroft–Gault formula is commonly used as a substitute for glomerular filtration rate (GFR) in Calvert's formula for carboplatin dosing, where adjusting serum creatinine measured using the enzymatic method with 0.2 mg/dL has been suggested in Japan. However, the effects of these adjustments on efficacy in patients with non‐small‐cell lung cancer remain unknown. METHODS: We conducted a post hoc analysis of the PREDICT1 study (CJLSG1201), a multicenter prospective observational trial of carboplatin–pemetrexed. Glomerular filtration rate values in Calvert's formula were back‐calculated from the administered dosages of carboplatin and the reported value of the target area under the curve. We estimated the serum creatinine adjustments and divided the patients into crude and adjusted groups. RESULTS: Patients in the crude group (N = 169) demonstrated similar efficacy to those in the adjusted group (N = 104) in progression‐free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) (hazard ratio [HR], 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.76–1.35; p = 0.916 vs. HR, 0.87; 95% CI, 0.65–1.17; p = 0.363), with higher grade 3–4 hematologic toxicity. Among patients aged ≥75 years, the crude group (N = 47) showed superior efficacy compared with the adjusted group (N = 17) in PFS and OS (HR, 0.37; 95% CI, 0.20–0.69; p = 0.002 vs. HR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.23–0.82; p = 0.010). CONCLUSIONS: Serum creatinine adjustment may be associated with similar efficacy compared to the crude serum creatinine value. In older patients, the adjustment should be cautiously applied owing to the potential for reduced efficacy. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-06-23 /pmc/articles/PMC10469651/ /pubmed/37351560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6235 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | RESEARCH ARTICLES Hatta, Takahiro Hase, Tetsunari Hara, Toru Kimura, Tomoki Kojima, Eiji Abe, Takashi Horio, Yoshitsugu Goto, Yasuhiro Ozawa, Naoya Yogo, Naoyuki Shibata, Hirofumi Shimokata, Tomoya Oguri, Tetsuya Yamamoto, Masashi Yanagisawa, Kiyoshi Ando, Masahiko Ando, Yuichi Kondo, Masashi Ishii, Makoto Hasegawa, Yoshinori Adjustment of creatinine clearance for carboplatin dosing in Calvert's formula and clinical efficacy for lung cancer |
title | Adjustment of creatinine clearance for carboplatin dosing in Calvert's formula and clinical efficacy for lung cancer |
title_full | Adjustment of creatinine clearance for carboplatin dosing in Calvert's formula and clinical efficacy for lung cancer |
title_fullStr | Adjustment of creatinine clearance for carboplatin dosing in Calvert's formula and clinical efficacy for lung cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Adjustment of creatinine clearance for carboplatin dosing in Calvert's formula and clinical efficacy for lung cancer |
title_short | Adjustment of creatinine clearance for carboplatin dosing in Calvert's formula and clinical efficacy for lung cancer |
title_sort | adjustment of creatinine clearance for carboplatin dosing in calvert's formula and clinical efficacy for lung cancer |
topic | RESEARCH ARTICLES |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10469651/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37351560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6235 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hattatakahiro adjustmentofcreatinineclearanceforcarboplatindosingincalvertsformulaandclinicalefficacyforlungcancer AT hasetetsunari adjustmentofcreatinineclearanceforcarboplatindosingincalvertsformulaandclinicalefficacyforlungcancer AT haratoru adjustmentofcreatinineclearanceforcarboplatindosingincalvertsformulaandclinicalefficacyforlungcancer AT kimuratomoki adjustmentofcreatinineclearanceforcarboplatindosingincalvertsformulaandclinicalefficacyforlungcancer AT kojimaeiji adjustmentofcreatinineclearanceforcarboplatindosingincalvertsformulaandclinicalefficacyforlungcancer AT abetakashi adjustmentofcreatinineclearanceforcarboplatindosingincalvertsformulaandclinicalefficacyforlungcancer AT horioyoshitsugu adjustmentofcreatinineclearanceforcarboplatindosingincalvertsformulaandclinicalefficacyforlungcancer AT gotoyasuhiro adjustmentofcreatinineclearanceforcarboplatindosingincalvertsformulaandclinicalefficacyforlungcancer AT ozawanaoya adjustmentofcreatinineclearanceforcarboplatindosingincalvertsformulaandclinicalefficacyforlungcancer AT yogonaoyuki adjustmentofcreatinineclearanceforcarboplatindosingincalvertsformulaandclinicalefficacyforlungcancer AT shibatahirofumi adjustmentofcreatinineclearanceforcarboplatindosingincalvertsformulaandclinicalefficacyforlungcancer AT shimokatatomoya adjustmentofcreatinineclearanceforcarboplatindosingincalvertsformulaandclinicalefficacyforlungcancer AT oguritetsuya adjustmentofcreatinineclearanceforcarboplatindosingincalvertsformulaandclinicalefficacyforlungcancer AT yamamotomasashi adjustmentofcreatinineclearanceforcarboplatindosingincalvertsformulaandclinicalefficacyforlungcancer AT yanagisawakiyoshi adjustmentofcreatinineclearanceforcarboplatindosingincalvertsformulaandclinicalefficacyforlungcancer AT andomasahiko adjustmentofcreatinineclearanceforcarboplatindosingincalvertsformulaandclinicalefficacyforlungcancer AT andoyuichi adjustmentofcreatinineclearanceforcarboplatindosingincalvertsformulaandclinicalefficacyforlungcancer AT kondomasashi adjustmentofcreatinineclearanceforcarboplatindosingincalvertsformulaandclinicalefficacyforlungcancer AT ishiimakoto adjustmentofcreatinineclearanceforcarboplatindosingincalvertsformulaandclinicalefficacyforlungcancer AT hasegawayoshinori adjustmentofcreatinineclearanceforcarboplatindosingincalvertsformulaandclinicalefficacyforlungcancer |