Cargando…
Systematic review of patients’ and healthcare professionals’ views on patient‐initiated follow‐up in treated cancer patients
BACKGROUND: Current follow‐up models in cancer are seen to be unsustainable and inflexible, and there is growing interest in alternative models, such as patient‐initiated follow‐up (PIFU). It is therefore important to understand whether PIFU is acceptable to patients and healthcare professionals (HC...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10469665/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6243 |
_version_ | 1785099492535566336 |
---|---|
author | Dretzke, Janine Lorenc, Ava Adriano, Ada Herd, Clare Mehanna, Hisham Nankivell, Paul Moore, David J. Karwath, Andreas Main, Barry Firth, Charlotte Gaunt, Claire Greaves, Colin Watson, Eila Gkoutos, Georgios Ozakinci, Gozde Wolstenholme, Jane Brett, Jo Duda, Joan Matheson, Lauren Cherrill, Louise‐Rae Calvert, Melanie Kiely, Philip Gaunt, Piers Chernbumroong, Saisakul Mittal, Saloni Thomas, Steve Winter, Stuart Wong, Wai Lup |
author_facet | Dretzke, Janine Lorenc, Ava Adriano, Ada Herd, Clare Mehanna, Hisham Nankivell, Paul Moore, David J. Karwath, Andreas Main, Barry Firth, Charlotte Gaunt, Claire Greaves, Colin Watson, Eila Gkoutos, Georgios Ozakinci, Gozde Wolstenholme, Jane Brett, Jo Duda, Joan Matheson, Lauren Cherrill, Louise‐Rae Calvert, Melanie Kiely, Philip Gaunt, Piers Chernbumroong, Saisakul Mittal, Saloni Thomas, Steve Winter, Stuart Wong, Wai Lup |
author_sort | Dretzke, Janine |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Current follow‐up models in cancer are seen to be unsustainable and inflexible, and there is growing interest in alternative models, such as patient‐initiated follow‐up (PIFU). It is therefore important to understand whether PIFU is acceptable to patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs). METHODS: Standard systematic review methodology aimed at limiting bias was used for study identification (to January 2022), selection and data extraction. Thematic synthesis was undertaken for qualitative data, and survey findings were tabulated and described. RESULTS: Nine qualitative studies and 22 surveys were included, mainly in breast and endometrial cancer. Women treated for breast or endometrial cancer and HCPs were mostly supportive of PIFU. Facilitators for PIFU included convenience, control over own health and avoidance of anxiety‐inducing clinic appointments. Barriers included loss of reassurance from scheduled visits and lack of confidence in self‐management. HCPs were supportive of PIFU but concerned about resistance to change, unsuitability of PIFU for some patients and costs. CONCLUSION: PIFU is viewed mostly positively by women treated for breast or endometrial cancer, and by HCPs, but further evidence is needed from a wider range of cancers, men, and more representative samples. A protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020181412). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10469665 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104696652023-09-01 Systematic review of patients’ and healthcare professionals’ views on patient‐initiated follow‐up in treated cancer patients Dretzke, Janine Lorenc, Ava Adriano, Ada Herd, Clare Mehanna, Hisham Nankivell, Paul Moore, David J. Karwath, Andreas Main, Barry Firth, Charlotte Gaunt, Claire Greaves, Colin Watson, Eila Gkoutos, Georgios Ozakinci, Gozde Wolstenholme, Jane Brett, Jo Duda, Joan Matheson, Lauren Cherrill, Louise‐Rae Calvert, Melanie Kiely, Philip Gaunt, Piers Chernbumroong, Saisakul Mittal, Saloni Thomas, Steve Winter, Stuart Wong, Wai Lup Cancer Med RESEARCH ARTICLES BACKGROUND: Current follow‐up models in cancer are seen to be unsustainable and inflexible, and there is growing interest in alternative models, such as patient‐initiated follow‐up (PIFU). It is therefore important to understand whether PIFU is acceptable to patients and healthcare professionals (HCPs). METHODS: Standard systematic review methodology aimed at limiting bias was used for study identification (to January 2022), selection and data extraction. Thematic synthesis was undertaken for qualitative data, and survey findings were tabulated and described. RESULTS: Nine qualitative studies and 22 surveys were included, mainly in breast and endometrial cancer. Women treated for breast or endometrial cancer and HCPs were mostly supportive of PIFU. Facilitators for PIFU included convenience, control over own health and avoidance of anxiety‐inducing clinic appointments. Barriers included loss of reassurance from scheduled visits and lack of confidence in self‐management. HCPs were supportive of PIFU but concerned about resistance to change, unsuitability of PIFU for some patients and costs. CONCLUSION: PIFU is viewed mostly positively by women treated for breast or endometrial cancer, and by HCPs, but further evidence is needed from a wider range of cancers, men, and more representative samples. A protocol was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020181412). John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC10469665/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6243 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | RESEARCH ARTICLES Dretzke, Janine Lorenc, Ava Adriano, Ada Herd, Clare Mehanna, Hisham Nankivell, Paul Moore, David J. Karwath, Andreas Main, Barry Firth, Charlotte Gaunt, Claire Greaves, Colin Watson, Eila Gkoutos, Georgios Ozakinci, Gozde Wolstenholme, Jane Brett, Jo Duda, Joan Matheson, Lauren Cherrill, Louise‐Rae Calvert, Melanie Kiely, Philip Gaunt, Piers Chernbumroong, Saisakul Mittal, Saloni Thomas, Steve Winter, Stuart Wong, Wai Lup Systematic review of patients’ and healthcare professionals’ views on patient‐initiated follow‐up in treated cancer patients |
title | Systematic review of patients’ and healthcare professionals’ views on patient‐initiated follow‐up in treated cancer patients |
title_full | Systematic review of patients’ and healthcare professionals’ views on patient‐initiated follow‐up in treated cancer patients |
title_fullStr | Systematic review of patients’ and healthcare professionals’ views on patient‐initiated follow‐up in treated cancer patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Systematic review of patients’ and healthcare professionals’ views on patient‐initiated follow‐up in treated cancer patients |
title_short | Systematic review of patients’ and healthcare professionals’ views on patient‐initiated follow‐up in treated cancer patients |
title_sort | systematic review of patients’ and healthcare professionals’ views on patient‐initiated follow‐up in treated cancer patients |
topic | RESEARCH ARTICLES |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10469665/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6243 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dretzkejanine systematicreviewofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionalsviewsonpatientinitiatedfollowupintreatedcancerpatients AT lorencava systematicreviewofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionalsviewsonpatientinitiatedfollowupintreatedcancerpatients AT adrianoada systematicreviewofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionalsviewsonpatientinitiatedfollowupintreatedcancerpatients AT herdclare systematicreviewofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionalsviewsonpatientinitiatedfollowupintreatedcancerpatients AT mehannahisham systematicreviewofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionalsviewsonpatientinitiatedfollowupintreatedcancerpatients AT nankivellpaul systematicreviewofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionalsviewsonpatientinitiatedfollowupintreatedcancerpatients AT mooredavidj systematicreviewofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionalsviewsonpatientinitiatedfollowupintreatedcancerpatients AT systematicreviewofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionalsviewsonpatientinitiatedfollowupintreatedcancerpatients AT karwathandreas systematicreviewofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionalsviewsonpatientinitiatedfollowupintreatedcancerpatients AT mainbarry systematicreviewofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionalsviewsonpatientinitiatedfollowupintreatedcancerpatients AT firthcharlotte systematicreviewofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionalsviewsonpatientinitiatedfollowupintreatedcancerpatients AT gauntclaire systematicreviewofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionalsviewsonpatientinitiatedfollowupintreatedcancerpatients AT greavescolin systematicreviewofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionalsviewsonpatientinitiatedfollowupintreatedcancerpatients AT watsoneila systematicreviewofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionalsviewsonpatientinitiatedfollowupintreatedcancerpatients AT gkoutosgeorgios systematicreviewofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionalsviewsonpatientinitiatedfollowupintreatedcancerpatients AT ozakincigozde systematicreviewofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionalsviewsonpatientinitiatedfollowupintreatedcancerpatients AT wolstenholmejane systematicreviewofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionalsviewsonpatientinitiatedfollowupintreatedcancerpatients AT brettjo systematicreviewofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionalsviewsonpatientinitiatedfollowupintreatedcancerpatients AT dudajoan systematicreviewofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionalsviewsonpatientinitiatedfollowupintreatedcancerpatients AT mathesonlauren systematicreviewofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionalsviewsonpatientinitiatedfollowupintreatedcancerpatients AT cherrilllouiserae systematicreviewofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionalsviewsonpatientinitiatedfollowupintreatedcancerpatients AT calvertmelanie systematicreviewofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionalsviewsonpatientinitiatedfollowupintreatedcancerpatients AT kielyphilip systematicreviewofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionalsviewsonpatientinitiatedfollowupintreatedcancerpatients AT gauntpiers systematicreviewofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionalsviewsonpatientinitiatedfollowupintreatedcancerpatients AT chernbumroongsaisakul systematicreviewofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionalsviewsonpatientinitiatedfollowupintreatedcancerpatients AT mittalsaloni systematicreviewofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionalsviewsonpatientinitiatedfollowupintreatedcancerpatients AT thomassteve systematicreviewofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionalsviewsonpatientinitiatedfollowupintreatedcancerpatients AT winterstuart systematicreviewofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionalsviewsonpatientinitiatedfollowupintreatedcancerpatients AT wongwailup systematicreviewofpatientsandhealthcareprofessionalsviewsonpatientinitiatedfollowupintreatedcancerpatients |