Cargando…

Clinical characteristics, tumor‐infiltrating lymphocytes, and prognosis in HER2‐low breast cancer: A comparison study with HER2‐zero and HER2‐positive disease

INTRODUCTION: HER2‐low breast cancer is a gradually recognized and unexplored group of diseases. We aimed to investigate the clinical and prognosis features and to identify the role of stromal tumor‐infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) in this population. METHODS: Consecutive primary breast cancer patie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lu, Yujie, Tong, Yiwei, Fei, Xiaochun, Chen, Xiaosong, Shen, Kunwei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10469737/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37366301
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6290
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: HER2‐low breast cancer is a gradually recognized and unexplored group of diseases. We aimed to investigate the clinical and prognosis features and to identify the role of stromal tumor‐infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) in this population. METHODS: Consecutive primary breast cancer patients treated between January 2009 to June 2013 were retrospectively reviewed. HER2‐low was defined as immunohistochemistry (IHC) 1+, or 2+ and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) negative. sTILs were scored following the international guidelines. Clinicopathologic features and survival were compared according to HER2 and sTILs category. RESULTS: A total of 973 breast cancer patients were enrolled, including 615 (63.2%) HER2‐low patients. HER2‐low patients shared more similarity with HER2‐0 cases in clinicopathological features. sTILs in HER2‐Low patients was comparable to HER2‐0 patients (p = 0.064), both significantly lower than HER2‐positive ones (p < 0.001). Meanwhile, tumors with sTILs ≥50% accounted for the least proportion of HER2‐low cases (p < 0.001). HER2 status had no significant influence on recurrence‐free survival (RFS, p = 0.901) in the whole population. However, in the estrogen receptor (ER)‐negative subgroup, HER2‐low was related to worse RFS (p = 0.009) and OS (p = 0.001) compared with HER2‐positive ones. sTILs increment was an independent favorable prognostic factor in the whole (OS, p = 0.003; RFS, p = 0.005) and HER2‐low population (OS, p = 0.007; RFS, p = 0.009) after adjusted to clinicopathological parameters. CONCLUSIONS: HER2‐low patients shared similar clinicopathological features with HER2‐0 rather than HER2‐positive cases and had relatively low sTILs. ER‐negative/HER2‐low patients had significantly inferior survival. sTILs increment was independently associated with favorable survival in the HER2‐low group, suggesting a potential benefit from a novel treatment strategy.