Cargando…
A systematic review and meta‐analysis of predictive and prognostic models for outcome prediction using positron emission tomography radiomics in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients
BACKGROUND: Positron emission tomography (PET) images of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients can assess the functional and biochemical processes at cellular levels. Therefore, PET radiomics‐based prediction and prognostic models have the potentials to understand tumour heterogenei...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10469753/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37353996 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6278 |
_version_ | 1785099513928613888 |
---|---|
author | Philip, Mahima Merin Welch, Andy McKiddie, Fergus Nath, Mintu |
author_facet | Philip, Mahima Merin Welch, Andy McKiddie, Fergus Nath, Mintu |
author_sort | Philip, Mahima Merin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Positron emission tomography (PET) images of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients can assess the functional and biochemical processes at cellular levels. Therefore, PET radiomics‐based prediction and prognostic models have the potentials to understand tumour heterogeneity and assist clinicians with diagnosis, prognosis and management of the disease. We conducted a systematic review of published modelling information to evaluate the usefulness of PET radiomics in the prediction and prognosis of HNSCC patients. METHODS: We searched bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science) from 2010 to 2021 and considered 31 studies with pre‐defined inclusion criteria. We followed the CHARMS checklist for data extraction and performed quality assessment using the PROBAST tool. We conducted a meta‐analysis to estimate the accuracy of the prediction and prognostic models using the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and average C‐statistic, respectively. RESULTS: Manual segmentation method followed by 40% of the maximum standardised uptake value (SUV(max)) thresholding is a commonly used approach. The area under the receiver operating curves of externally validated prediction models ranged between 0.60–0.87, 0.65–0.86 and 0.62–0.75 for overall survival, distant metastasis and recurrence, respectively. Most studies highlighted an overall high risk of bias (outcome definition, statistical methodologies and external validation of models) and high unclear concern in terms of applicability. The meta‐analysis showed the estimated pooled DOR of 6.75 (95% CI: 4.45, 10.23) for prediction models and the C‐statistic of 0.71 (95% CI: 0.67, 0.74) for prognostic models. CONCLUSIONS: Both prediction and prognostic models using clinical variables and PET radiomics demonstrated reliable accuracy for detecting adverse outcomes in HNSCC, suggesting the prospect of PET radiomics in clinical settings for diagnosis, prognosis and management of HNSCC patients. Future studies of prediction and prognostic models should emphasise the quality of reporting, external model validation, generalisability to real clinical scenarios and enhanced reproducibility of results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10469753 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104697532023-09-01 A systematic review and meta‐analysis of predictive and prognostic models for outcome prediction using positron emission tomography radiomics in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients Philip, Mahima Merin Welch, Andy McKiddie, Fergus Nath, Mintu Cancer Med REVIEW BACKGROUND: Positron emission tomography (PET) images of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients can assess the functional and biochemical processes at cellular levels. Therefore, PET radiomics‐based prediction and prognostic models have the potentials to understand tumour heterogeneity and assist clinicians with diagnosis, prognosis and management of the disease. We conducted a systematic review of published modelling information to evaluate the usefulness of PET radiomics in the prediction and prognosis of HNSCC patients. METHODS: We searched bibliographic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science) from 2010 to 2021 and considered 31 studies with pre‐defined inclusion criteria. We followed the CHARMS checklist for data extraction and performed quality assessment using the PROBAST tool. We conducted a meta‐analysis to estimate the accuracy of the prediction and prognostic models using the diagnostic odds ratio (DOR) and average C‐statistic, respectively. RESULTS: Manual segmentation method followed by 40% of the maximum standardised uptake value (SUV(max)) thresholding is a commonly used approach. The area under the receiver operating curves of externally validated prediction models ranged between 0.60–0.87, 0.65–0.86 and 0.62–0.75 for overall survival, distant metastasis and recurrence, respectively. Most studies highlighted an overall high risk of bias (outcome definition, statistical methodologies and external validation of models) and high unclear concern in terms of applicability. The meta‐analysis showed the estimated pooled DOR of 6.75 (95% CI: 4.45, 10.23) for prediction models and the C‐statistic of 0.71 (95% CI: 0.67, 0.74) for prognostic models. CONCLUSIONS: Both prediction and prognostic models using clinical variables and PET radiomics demonstrated reliable accuracy for detecting adverse outcomes in HNSCC, suggesting the prospect of PET radiomics in clinical settings for diagnosis, prognosis and management of HNSCC patients. Future studies of prediction and prognostic models should emphasise the quality of reporting, external model validation, generalisability to real clinical scenarios and enhanced reproducibility of results. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2023-06-24 /pmc/articles/PMC10469753/ /pubmed/37353996 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6278 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | REVIEW Philip, Mahima Merin Welch, Andy McKiddie, Fergus Nath, Mintu A systematic review and meta‐analysis of predictive and prognostic models for outcome prediction using positron emission tomography radiomics in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients |
title | A systematic review and meta‐analysis of predictive and prognostic models for outcome prediction using positron emission tomography radiomics in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients |
title_full | A systematic review and meta‐analysis of predictive and prognostic models for outcome prediction using positron emission tomography radiomics in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients |
title_fullStr | A systematic review and meta‐analysis of predictive and prognostic models for outcome prediction using positron emission tomography radiomics in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients |
title_full_unstemmed | A systematic review and meta‐analysis of predictive and prognostic models for outcome prediction using positron emission tomography radiomics in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients |
title_short | A systematic review and meta‐analysis of predictive and prognostic models for outcome prediction using positron emission tomography radiomics in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients |
title_sort | systematic review and meta‐analysis of predictive and prognostic models for outcome prediction using positron emission tomography radiomics in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients |
topic | REVIEW |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10469753/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37353996 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.6278 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT philipmahimamerin asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpredictiveandprognosticmodelsforoutcomepredictionusingpositronemissiontomographyradiomicsinheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinomapatients AT welchandy asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpredictiveandprognosticmodelsforoutcomepredictionusingpositronemissiontomographyradiomicsinheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinomapatients AT mckiddiefergus asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpredictiveandprognosticmodelsforoutcomepredictionusingpositronemissiontomographyradiomicsinheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinomapatients AT nathmintu asystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpredictiveandprognosticmodelsforoutcomepredictionusingpositronemissiontomographyradiomicsinheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinomapatients AT philipmahimamerin systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpredictiveandprognosticmodelsforoutcomepredictionusingpositronemissiontomographyradiomicsinheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinomapatients AT welchandy systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpredictiveandprognosticmodelsforoutcomepredictionusingpositronemissiontomographyradiomicsinheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinomapatients AT mckiddiefergus systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpredictiveandprognosticmodelsforoutcomepredictionusingpositronemissiontomographyradiomicsinheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinomapatients AT nathmintu systematicreviewandmetaanalysisofpredictiveandprognosticmodelsforoutcomepredictionusingpositronemissiontomographyradiomicsinheadandnecksquamouscellcarcinomapatients |