Cargando…
The role of smart polymeric biomaterials in bone regeneration: a review
Addressing critical bone defects necessitates innovative solutions beyond traditional methods, which are constrained by issues such as immune rejection and donor scarcity. Smart polymeric biomaterials that respond to external stimuli have emerged as a promising alternative, fostering endogenous bone...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10469876/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37662432 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1240861 |
_version_ | 1785099544694882304 |
---|---|
author | Xing, Yanghui Qiu, Linhui Liu, Danqing Dai, Sihan Sheu, Chia-Lin |
author_facet | Xing, Yanghui Qiu, Linhui Liu, Danqing Dai, Sihan Sheu, Chia-Lin |
author_sort | Xing, Yanghui |
collection | PubMed |
description | Addressing critical bone defects necessitates innovative solutions beyond traditional methods, which are constrained by issues such as immune rejection and donor scarcity. Smart polymeric biomaterials that respond to external stimuli have emerged as a promising alternative, fostering endogenous bone regeneration. Light-responsive polymers, employed in 3D-printed scaffolds and photothermal therapies, enhance antibacterial efficiency and bone repair. Thermo-responsive biomaterials show promise in controlled bioactive agent release, stimulating osteocyte differentiation and bone regeneration. Further, the integration of conductive elements into polymers improves electrical signal transmission, influencing cellular behavior positively. Innovations include advanced 3D-printed poly (l-lactic acid) scaffolds, polyurethane foam scaffolds promoting cell differentiation, and responsive polymeric biomaterials for osteogenic and antibacterial drug delivery. Other developments focus on enzyme-responsive and redox-responsive polymers, which offer potential for bone regeneration and combat infection. Biomaterials responsive to mechanical, magnetic, and acoustic stimuli also show potential in bone regeneration, including mechanically-responsive polymers, magnetic-responsive biomaterials with superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles, and acoustic-responsive biomaterials. In conclusion, smart biopolymers are reshaping scaffold design and bone regeneration strategies. However, understanding their advantages and limitations is vital, indicating the need for continued exploratory research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10469876 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104698762023-09-01 The role of smart polymeric biomaterials in bone regeneration: a review Xing, Yanghui Qiu, Linhui Liu, Danqing Dai, Sihan Sheu, Chia-Lin Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology Addressing critical bone defects necessitates innovative solutions beyond traditional methods, which are constrained by issues such as immune rejection and donor scarcity. Smart polymeric biomaterials that respond to external stimuli have emerged as a promising alternative, fostering endogenous bone regeneration. Light-responsive polymers, employed in 3D-printed scaffolds and photothermal therapies, enhance antibacterial efficiency and bone repair. Thermo-responsive biomaterials show promise in controlled bioactive agent release, stimulating osteocyte differentiation and bone regeneration. Further, the integration of conductive elements into polymers improves electrical signal transmission, influencing cellular behavior positively. Innovations include advanced 3D-printed poly (l-lactic acid) scaffolds, polyurethane foam scaffolds promoting cell differentiation, and responsive polymeric biomaterials for osteogenic and antibacterial drug delivery. Other developments focus on enzyme-responsive and redox-responsive polymers, which offer potential for bone regeneration and combat infection. Biomaterials responsive to mechanical, magnetic, and acoustic stimuli also show potential in bone regeneration, including mechanically-responsive polymers, magnetic-responsive biomaterials with superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles, and acoustic-responsive biomaterials. In conclusion, smart biopolymers are reshaping scaffold design and bone regeneration strategies. However, understanding their advantages and limitations is vital, indicating the need for continued exploratory research. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10469876/ /pubmed/37662432 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1240861 Text en Copyright © 2023 Xing, Qiu, Liu, Dai and Sheu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Bioengineering and Biotechnology Xing, Yanghui Qiu, Linhui Liu, Danqing Dai, Sihan Sheu, Chia-Lin The role of smart polymeric biomaterials in bone regeneration: a review |
title | The role of smart polymeric biomaterials in bone regeneration: a review |
title_full | The role of smart polymeric biomaterials in bone regeneration: a review |
title_fullStr | The role of smart polymeric biomaterials in bone regeneration: a review |
title_full_unstemmed | The role of smart polymeric biomaterials in bone regeneration: a review |
title_short | The role of smart polymeric biomaterials in bone regeneration: a review |
title_sort | role of smart polymeric biomaterials in bone regeneration: a review |
topic | Bioengineering and Biotechnology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10469876/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37662432 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1240861 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT xingyanghui theroleofsmartpolymericbiomaterialsinboneregenerationareview AT qiulinhui theroleofsmartpolymericbiomaterialsinboneregenerationareview AT liudanqing theroleofsmartpolymericbiomaterialsinboneregenerationareview AT daisihan theroleofsmartpolymericbiomaterialsinboneregenerationareview AT sheuchialin theroleofsmartpolymericbiomaterialsinboneregenerationareview AT xingyanghui roleofsmartpolymericbiomaterialsinboneregenerationareview AT qiulinhui roleofsmartpolymericbiomaterialsinboneregenerationareview AT liudanqing roleofsmartpolymericbiomaterialsinboneregenerationareview AT daisihan roleofsmartpolymericbiomaterialsinboneregenerationareview AT sheuchialin roleofsmartpolymericbiomaterialsinboneregenerationareview |