Cargando…

The role of smart polymeric biomaterials in bone regeneration: a review

Addressing critical bone defects necessitates innovative solutions beyond traditional methods, which are constrained by issues such as immune rejection and donor scarcity. Smart polymeric biomaterials that respond to external stimuli have emerged as a promising alternative, fostering endogenous bone...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xing, Yanghui, Qiu, Linhui, Liu, Danqing, Dai, Sihan, Sheu, Chia-Lin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10469876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37662432
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1240861
_version_ 1785099544694882304
author Xing, Yanghui
Qiu, Linhui
Liu, Danqing
Dai, Sihan
Sheu, Chia-Lin
author_facet Xing, Yanghui
Qiu, Linhui
Liu, Danqing
Dai, Sihan
Sheu, Chia-Lin
author_sort Xing, Yanghui
collection PubMed
description Addressing critical bone defects necessitates innovative solutions beyond traditional methods, which are constrained by issues such as immune rejection and donor scarcity. Smart polymeric biomaterials that respond to external stimuli have emerged as a promising alternative, fostering endogenous bone regeneration. Light-responsive polymers, employed in 3D-printed scaffolds and photothermal therapies, enhance antibacterial efficiency and bone repair. Thermo-responsive biomaterials show promise in controlled bioactive agent release, stimulating osteocyte differentiation and bone regeneration. Further, the integration of conductive elements into polymers improves electrical signal transmission, influencing cellular behavior positively. Innovations include advanced 3D-printed poly (l-lactic acid) scaffolds, polyurethane foam scaffolds promoting cell differentiation, and responsive polymeric biomaterials for osteogenic and antibacterial drug delivery. Other developments focus on enzyme-responsive and redox-responsive polymers, which offer potential for bone regeneration and combat infection. Biomaterials responsive to mechanical, magnetic, and acoustic stimuli also show potential in bone regeneration, including mechanically-responsive polymers, magnetic-responsive biomaterials with superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles, and acoustic-responsive biomaterials. In conclusion, smart biopolymers are reshaping scaffold design and bone regeneration strategies. However, understanding their advantages and limitations is vital, indicating the need for continued exploratory research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10469876
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104698762023-09-01 The role of smart polymeric biomaterials in bone regeneration: a review Xing, Yanghui Qiu, Linhui Liu, Danqing Dai, Sihan Sheu, Chia-Lin Front Bioeng Biotechnol Bioengineering and Biotechnology Addressing critical bone defects necessitates innovative solutions beyond traditional methods, which are constrained by issues such as immune rejection and donor scarcity. Smart polymeric biomaterials that respond to external stimuli have emerged as a promising alternative, fostering endogenous bone regeneration. Light-responsive polymers, employed in 3D-printed scaffolds and photothermal therapies, enhance antibacterial efficiency and bone repair. Thermo-responsive biomaterials show promise in controlled bioactive agent release, stimulating osteocyte differentiation and bone regeneration. Further, the integration of conductive elements into polymers improves electrical signal transmission, influencing cellular behavior positively. Innovations include advanced 3D-printed poly (l-lactic acid) scaffolds, polyurethane foam scaffolds promoting cell differentiation, and responsive polymeric biomaterials for osteogenic and antibacterial drug delivery. Other developments focus on enzyme-responsive and redox-responsive polymers, which offer potential for bone regeneration and combat infection. Biomaterials responsive to mechanical, magnetic, and acoustic stimuli also show potential in bone regeneration, including mechanically-responsive polymers, magnetic-responsive biomaterials with superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles, and acoustic-responsive biomaterials. In conclusion, smart biopolymers are reshaping scaffold design and bone regeneration strategies. However, understanding their advantages and limitations is vital, indicating the need for continued exploratory research. Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10469876/ /pubmed/37662432 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1240861 Text en Copyright © 2023 Xing, Qiu, Liu, Dai and Sheu. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Bioengineering and Biotechnology
Xing, Yanghui
Qiu, Linhui
Liu, Danqing
Dai, Sihan
Sheu, Chia-Lin
The role of smart polymeric biomaterials in bone regeneration: a review
title The role of smart polymeric biomaterials in bone regeneration: a review
title_full The role of smart polymeric biomaterials in bone regeneration: a review
title_fullStr The role of smart polymeric biomaterials in bone regeneration: a review
title_full_unstemmed The role of smart polymeric biomaterials in bone regeneration: a review
title_short The role of smart polymeric biomaterials in bone regeneration: a review
title_sort role of smart polymeric biomaterials in bone regeneration: a review
topic Bioengineering and Biotechnology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10469876/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37662432
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fbioe.2023.1240861
work_keys_str_mv AT xingyanghui theroleofsmartpolymericbiomaterialsinboneregenerationareview
AT qiulinhui theroleofsmartpolymericbiomaterialsinboneregenerationareview
AT liudanqing theroleofsmartpolymericbiomaterialsinboneregenerationareview
AT daisihan theroleofsmartpolymericbiomaterialsinboneregenerationareview
AT sheuchialin theroleofsmartpolymericbiomaterialsinboneregenerationareview
AT xingyanghui roleofsmartpolymericbiomaterialsinboneregenerationareview
AT qiulinhui roleofsmartpolymericbiomaterialsinboneregenerationareview
AT liudanqing roleofsmartpolymericbiomaterialsinboneregenerationareview
AT daisihan roleofsmartpolymericbiomaterialsinboneregenerationareview
AT sheuchialin roleofsmartpolymericbiomaterialsinboneregenerationareview