Cargando…

Zinc recovery from bioleachate using a microbial electrolysis cell and comparison with selective precipitation

Metal recycling is essential for strengthening a circular economy. Microbial leaching (bioleaching) is an economical and environmentally friendly technology widely used to extract metals from insoluble ores or secondary resources such as dust, ashes, and slags. On the other hand, microbial electroly...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Spiess, Sabine, Kucera, Jiri, Vaculovic, Tomas, Birklbauer, Ludwig, Habermaier, Clemens, Conde, Amaia Sasiain, Mandl, Martin, Haberbauer, Marianne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10469928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37664121
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1238853
_version_ 1785099557490655232
author Spiess, Sabine
Kucera, Jiri
Vaculovic, Tomas
Birklbauer, Ludwig
Habermaier, Clemens
Conde, Amaia Sasiain
Mandl, Martin
Haberbauer, Marianne
author_facet Spiess, Sabine
Kucera, Jiri
Vaculovic, Tomas
Birklbauer, Ludwig
Habermaier, Clemens
Conde, Amaia Sasiain
Mandl, Martin
Haberbauer, Marianne
author_sort Spiess, Sabine
collection PubMed
description Metal recycling is essential for strengthening a circular economy. Microbial leaching (bioleaching) is an economical and environmentally friendly technology widely used to extract metals from insoluble ores or secondary resources such as dust, ashes, and slags. On the other hand, microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) would offer an energy-efficient application for recovering valuable metals from an aqueous solution. In this study, we investigated a MEC for Zn recovery from metal-laden bioleachate for the first time by applying a constant potential of −100 mV vs. Ag/AgCl (3 M NaCl) on a synthetic wastewater-treating bioanode. Zn was deposited onto the cathode surface with a recovery efficiency of 41 ± 13% and an energy consumption of 2.55 kWh kg(−1). For comparison, Zn recovery from zinc sulfate solution resulted in a Zn recovery efficiency of 100 ± 0% and an energy consumption of 0.70 kWh kg(−1). Furthermore, selective metal precipitation of the bioleachate was performed. Individual metals were almost completely precipitated from the bioleachate at pH 5 (Al), pH 7 (Zn and Fe), and pH 9 (Mg and Mn).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10469928
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104699282023-09-01 Zinc recovery from bioleachate using a microbial electrolysis cell and comparison with selective precipitation Spiess, Sabine Kucera, Jiri Vaculovic, Tomas Birklbauer, Ludwig Habermaier, Clemens Conde, Amaia Sasiain Mandl, Martin Haberbauer, Marianne Front Microbiol Microbiology Metal recycling is essential for strengthening a circular economy. Microbial leaching (bioleaching) is an economical and environmentally friendly technology widely used to extract metals from insoluble ores or secondary resources such as dust, ashes, and slags. On the other hand, microbial electrolysis cells (MECs) would offer an energy-efficient application for recovering valuable metals from an aqueous solution. In this study, we investigated a MEC for Zn recovery from metal-laden bioleachate for the first time by applying a constant potential of −100 mV vs. Ag/AgCl (3 M NaCl) on a synthetic wastewater-treating bioanode. Zn was deposited onto the cathode surface with a recovery efficiency of 41 ± 13% and an energy consumption of 2.55 kWh kg(−1). For comparison, Zn recovery from zinc sulfate solution resulted in a Zn recovery efficiency of 100 ± 0% and an energy consumption of 0.70 kWh kg(−1). Furthermore, selective metal precipitation of the bioleachate was performed. Individual metals were almost completely precipitated from the bioleachate at pH 5 (Al), pH 7 (Zn and Fe), and pH 9 (Mg and Mn). Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-08-17 /pmc/articles/PMC10469928/ /pubmed/37664121 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1238853 Text en Copyright © 2023 Spiess, Kucera, Vaculovic, Birklbauer, Habermaier, Sasiain Conde, Mandl and Haberbauer. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Microbiology
Spiess, Sabine
Kucera, Jiri
Vaculovic, Tomas
Birklbauer, Ludwig
Habermaier, Clemens
Conde, Amaia Sasiain
Mandl, Martin
Haberbauer, Marianne
Zinc recovery from bioleachate using a microbial electrolysis cell and comparison with selective precipitation
title Zinc recovery from bioleachate using a microbial electrolysis cell and comparison with selective precipitation
title_full Zinc recovery from bioleachate using a microbial electrolysis cell and comparison with selective precipitation
title_fullStr Zinc recovery from bioleachate using a microbial electrolysis cell and comparison with selective precipitation
title_full_unstemmed Zinc recovery from bioleachate using a microbial electrolysis cell and comparison with selective precipitation
title_short Zinc recovery from bioleachate using a microbial electrolysis cell and comparison with selective precipitation
title_sort zinc recovery from bioleachate using a microbial electrolysis cell and comparison with selective precipitation
topic Microbiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10469928/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37664121
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2023.1238853
work_keys_str_mv AT spiesssabine zincrecoveryfrombioleachateusingamicrobialelectrolysiscellandcomparisonwithselectiveprecipitation
AT kucerajiri zincrecoveryfrombioleachateusingamicrobialelectrolysiscellandcomparisonwithselectiveprecipitation
AT vaculovictomas zincrecoveryfrombioleachateusingamicrobialelectrolysiscellandcomparisonwithselectiveprecipitation
AT birklbauerludwig zincrecoveryfrombioleachateusingamicrobialelectrolysiscellandcomparisonwithselectiveprecipitation
AT habermaierclemens zincrecoveryfrombioleachateusingamicrobialelectrolysiscellandcomparisonwithselectiveprecipitation
AT condeamaiasasiain zincrecoveryfrombioleachateusingamicrobialelectrolysiscellandcomparisonwithselectiveprecipitation
AT mandlmartin zincrecoveryfrombioleachateusingamicrobialelectrolysiscellandcomparisonwithselectiveprecipitation
AT haberbauermarianne zincrecoveryfrombioleachateusingamicrobialelectrolysiscellandcomparisonwithselectiveprecipitation