Cargando…

Clinical significance of genetic profiling based on different anatomic sites in patients with mucosal melanoma who received or did not receive immune checkpoint inhibitors

BACKGROUND: To date, data on the efficacy of targeted therapies for mucosal melanoma (MM) are limited. In this study, we analyzed genetic alterations according to the primary site of origin, which could provide clues for targeted therapy for MM. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Hai-Yun, Liu, Ye, Deng, Ling, Jiang, Kuntai, Yang, Xin-Hua, Wu, Xiao-Yan, Guo, Kai-Hua, Wang, Fang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10469937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37649078
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12935-023-03032-3
_version_ 1785099559695810560
author Wang, Hai-Yun
Liu, Ye
Deng, Ling
Jiang, Kuntai
Yang, Xin-Hua
Wu, Xiao-Yan
Guo, Kai-Hua
Wang, Fang
author_facet Wang, Hai-Yun
Liu, Ye
Deng, Ling
Jiang, Kuntai
Yang, Xin-Hua
Wu, Xiao-Yan
Guo, Kai-Hua
Wang, Fang
author_sort Wang, Hai-Yun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To date, data on the efficacy of targeted therapies for mucosal melanoma (MM) are limited. In this study, we analyzed genetic alterations according to the primary site of origin, which could provide clues for targeted therapy for MM. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 112 patients with MM. Targeted sequencing was performed to analyze genetic aberrations. Kaplan–Meier analysis was conducted with the log-rank test to compare the significance among subgroups. RESULTS: In total, 112 patients with MM were included according to the anatomic sites: 38 (33.9%) in the head and neck, 22 (19.6%) in the genitourinary tract, 21 (18.8%) in the anorectum, 19 (17.0%) in the esophagus, 10 (8.9%) in the uvea, and 2 (1.8%) in the small bowel. The most significantly mutated genes included BRAF (17%), KIT (15%), RAS (15%), TP53 (13%), NF1 (12%), SF3B1 (11%), GNA11 (7%), GNAQ (5%), and FBXW7 (4%). A large number of chromosomal structural variants was found. The anatomic sites of esophagus and small bowel were independent risk factors for progression-free survival (PFS, hazard ratio [HR] 4.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.42–9.45, P < 0.0001) and overall survival (OS, HR 5.26, 95% CI 2.51–11.03, P < 0.0001). Casitas B-lineage lymphoma (CBL) mutants showed significantly poorer PFS and OS. In contrast, MM patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) had a significantly more favorable OS (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.20–0.75, P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings reveal the genetic features of patients with MM, mainly across six anatomic sites, offering a potential avenue for targeted therapies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12935-023-03032-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10469937
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104699372023-09-01 Clinical significance of genetic profiling based on different anatomic sites in patients with mucosal melanoma who received or did not receive immune checkpoint inhibitors Wang, Hai-Yun Liu, Ye Deng, Ling Jiang, Kuntai Yang, Xin-Hua Wu, Xiao-Yan Guo, Kai-Hua Wang, Fang Cancer Cell Int Research BACKGROUND: To date, data on the efficacy of targeted therapies for mucosal melanoma (MM) are limited. In this study, we analyzed genetic alterations according to the primary site of origin, which could provide clues for targeted therapy for MM. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of 112 patients with MM. Targeted sequencing was performed to analyze genetic aberrations. Kaplan–Meier analysis was conducted with the log-rank test to compare the significance among subgroups. RESULTS: In total, 112 patients with MM were included according to the anatomic sites: 38 (33.9%) in the head and neck, 22 (19.6%) in the genitourinary tract, 21 (18.8%) in the anorectum, 19 (17.0%) in the esophagus, 10 (8.9%) in the uvea, and 2 (1.8%) in the small bowel. The most significantly mutated genes included BRAF (17%), KIT (15%), RAS (15%), TP53 (13%), NF1 (12%), SF3B1 (11%), GNA11 (7%), GNAQ (5%), and FBXW7 (4%). A large number of chromosomal structural variants was found. The anatomic sites of esophagus and small bowel were independent risk factors for progression-free survival (PFS, hazard ratio [HR] 4.78, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.42–9.45, P < 0.0001) and overall survival (OS, HR 5.26, 95% CI 2.51–11.03, P < 0.0001). Casitas B-lineage lymphoma (CBL) mutants showed significantly poorer PFS and OS. In contrast, MM patients who received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) had a significantly more favorable OS (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.20–0.75, P = 0.008). CONCLUSIONS: Our findings reveal the genetic features of patients with MM, mainly across six anatomic sites, offering a potential avenue for targeted therapies. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12935-023-03032-3. BioMed Central 2023-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10469937/ /pubmed/37649078 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12935-023-03032-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Wang, Hai-Yun
Liu, Ye
Deng, Ling
Jiang, Kuntai
Yang, Xin-Hua
Wu, Xiao-Yan
Guo, Kai-Hua
Wang, Fang
Clinical significance of genetic profiling based on different anatomic sites in patients with mucosal melanoma who received or did not receive immune checkpoint inhibitors
title Clinical significance of genetic profiling based on different anatomic sites in patients with mucosal melanoma who received or did not receive immune checkpoint inhibitors
title_full Clinical significance of genetic profiling based on different anatomic sites in patients with mucosal melanoma who received or did not receive immune checkpoint inhibitors
title_fullStr Clinical significance of genetic profiling based on different anatomic sites in patients with mucosal melanoma who received or did not receive immune checkpoint inhibitors
title_full_unstemmed Clinical significance of genetic profiling based on different anatomic sites in patients with mucosal melanoma who received or did not receive immune checkpoint inhibitors
title_short Clinical significance of genetic profiling based on different anatomic sites in patients with mucosal melanoma who received or did not receive immune checkpoint inhibitors
title_sort clinical significance of genetic profiling based on different anatomic sites in patients with mucosal melanoma who received or did not receive immune checkpoint inhibitors
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10469937/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37649078
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12935-023-03032-3
work_keys_str_mv AT wanghaiyun clinicalsignificanceofgeneticprofilingbasedondifferentanatomicsitesinpatientswithmucosalmelanomawhoreceivedordidnotreceiveimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT liuye clinicalsignificanceofgeneticprofilingbasedondifferentanatomicsitesinpatientswithmucosalmelanomawhoreceivedordidnotreceiveimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT dengling clinicalsignificanceofgeneticprofilingbasedondifferentanatomicsitesinpatientswithmucosalmelanomawhoreceivedordidnotreceiveimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT jiangkuntai clinicalsignificanceofgeneticprofilingbasedondifferentanatomicsitesinpatientswithmucosalmelanomawhoreceivedordidnotreceiveimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT yangxinhua clinicalsignificanceofgeneticprofilingbasedondifferentanatomicsitesinpatientswithmucosalmelanomawhoreceivedordidnotreceiveimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT wuxiaoyan clinicalsignificanceofgeneticprofilingbasedondifferentanatomicsitesinpatientswithmucosalmelanomawhoreceivedordidnotreceiveimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT guokaihua clinicalsignificanceofgeneticprofilingbasedondifferentanatomicsitesinpatientswithmucosalmelanomawhoreceivedordidnotreceiveimmunecheckpointinhibitors
AT wangfang clinicalsignificanceofgeneticprofilingbasedondifferentanatomicsitesinpatientswithmucosalmelanomawhoreceivedordidnotreceiveimmunecheckpointinhibitors