Cargando…
Examining the social networks of older adults receiving informal or formal care: a systematic review
PURPOSE: To address the care needs of older adults, it is important to identify and understand the forms of care support older adults received. This systematic review aims to examine the social networks of older adults receiving informal or formal care and the factors that influenced their networks....
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10470175/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37653368 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04190-9 |
_version_ | 1785099627269193728 |
---|---|
author | Ho, Iris Szu-Szu McGill, Kris Malden, Stephen Wilson, Cara Pearce, Caroline Kaner, Eileen Vines, John Aujla, Navneet Lewis, Sue Restocchi, Valerio Marshall, Alan Guthrie, Bruce |
author_facet | Ho, Iris Szu-Szu McGill, Kris Malden, Stephen Wilson, Cara Pearce, Caroline Kaner, Eileen Vines, John Aujla, Navneet Lewis, Sue Restocchi, Valerio Marshall, Alan Guthrie, Bruce |
author_sort | Ho, Iris Szu-Szu |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To address the care needs of older adults, it is important to identify and understand the forms of care support older adults received. This systematic review aims to examine the social networks of older adults receiving informal or formal care and the factors that influenced their networks. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted by searching six databases from inception to January 31, 2023. The review included primary studies focusing on older adults receiving long-term care, encompassing both informal and formal care. To assess the risk of bias in the included studies, validated appraisal tools specifically designed for different study types were utilized. Network analysis was employed to identify the grouping of study concepts, which subsequently formed the foundation for describing themes through narrative synthesis. RESULTS: We identified 121 studies relating to the formal and informal care of older adults’ networks. A variety of social ties were examined by included studies. The most commonly examined sources of care support were family members (such as children and spouses) and friends. Several factors were consistently reported to influence the provision of informal care, including the intensity of networks, reciprocity, and geographical proximity. In terms of formal care utilization, older age and poor health status were found to be associated with increased use of healthcare services. Additionally, physical limitations and cognitive impairment were identified as factors contributing to decreased social engagement. CONCLUSION: This review found that older people were embedded within a diverse network. The findings of this review emphasize the importance of recognizing and incorporating the diversity of social networks in care plans and policies to enhance the effectiveness of interventions and improve the overall well-being of older adults. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-023-04190-9. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10470175 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104701752023-09-01 Examining the social networks of older adults receiving informal or formal care: a systematic review Ho, Iris Szu-Szu McGill, Kris Malden, Stephen Wilson, Cara Pearce, Caroline Kaner, Eileen Vines, John Aujla, Navneet Lewis, Sue Restocchi, Valerio Marshall, Alan Guthrie, Bruce BMC Geriatr Research PURPOSE: To address the care needs of older adults, it is important to identify and understand the forms of care support older adults received. This systematic review aims to examine the social networks of older adults receiving informal or formal care and the factors that influenced their networks. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted by searching six databases from inception to January 31, 2023. The review included primary studies focusing on older adults receiving long-term care, encompassing both informal and formal care. To assess the risk of bias in the included studies, validated appraisal tools specifically designed for different study types were utilized. Network analysis was employed to identify the grouping of study concepts, which subsequently formed the foundation for describing themes through narrative synthesis. RESULTS: We identified 121 studies relating to the formal and informal care of older adults’ networks. A variety of social ties were examined by included studies. The most commonly examined sources of care support were family members (such as children and spouses) and friends. Several factors were consistently reported to influence the provision of informal care, including the intensity of networks, reciprocity, and geographical proximity. In terms of formal care utilization, older age and poor health status were found to be associated with increased use of healthcare services. Additionally, physical limitations and cognitive impairment were identified as factors contributing to decreased social engagement. CONCLUSION: This review found that older people were embedded within a diverse network. The findings of this review emphasize the importance of recognizing and incorporating the diversity of social networks in care plans and policies to enhance the effectiveness of interventions and improve the overall well-being of older adults. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-023-04190-9. BioMed Central 2023-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10470175/ /pubmed/37653368 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04190-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Ho, Iris Szu-Szu McGill, Kris Malden, Stephen Wilson, Cara Pearce, Caroline Kaner, Eileen Vines, John Aujla, Navneet Lewis, Sue Restocchi, Valerio Marshall, Alan Guthrie, Bruce Examining the social networks of older adults receiving informal or formal care: a systematic review |
title | Examining the social networks of older adults receiving informal or formal care: a systematic review |
title_full | Examining the social networks of older adults receiving informal or formal care: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Examining the social networks of older adults receiving informal or formal care: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Examining the social networks of older adults receiving informal or formal care: a systematic review |
title_short | Examining the social networks of older adults receiving informal or formal care: a systematic review |
title_sort | examining the social networks of older adults receiving informal or formal care: a systematic review |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10470175/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37653368 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04190-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hoirisszuszu examiningthesocialnetworksofolderadultsreceivinginformalorformalcareasystematicreview AT mcgillkris examiningthesocialnetworksofolderadultsreceivinginformalorformalcareasystematicreview AT maldenstephen examiningthesocialnetworksofolderadultsreceivinginformalorformalcareasystematicreview AT wilsoncara examiningthesocialnetworksofolderadultsreceivinginformalorformalcareasystematicreview AT pearcecaroline examiningthesocialnetworksofolderadultsreceivinginformalorformalcareasystematicreview AT kanereileen examiningthesocialnetworksofolderadultsreceivinginformalorformalcareasystematicreview AT vinesjohn examiningthesocialnetworksofolderadultsreceivinginformalorformalcareasystematicreview AT aujlanavneet examiningthesocialnetworksofolderadultsreceivinginformalorformalcareasystematicreview AT lewissue examiningthesocialnetworksofolderadultsreceivinginformalorformalcareasystematicreview AT restocchivalerio examiningthesocialnetworksofolderadultsreceivinginformalorformalcareasystematicreview AT marshallalan examiningthesocialnetworksofolderadultsreceivinginformalorformalcareasystematicreview AT guthriebruce examiningthesocialnetworksofolderadultsreceivinginformalorformalcareasystematicreview |