Cargando…
Systematic Review of Contemporary Theories Used for Co-creation, Co-design and Co-production in Public Health
BACKGROUND: There is a need to systematically identify and summarize the contemporary theories and theoretical frameworks used for co-creation, co-design and co-production in public health research. METHODS: The reporting of this systematic review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10470345/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37147918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdad046 |
_version_ | 1785099660249006080 |
---|---|
author | Messiha, Katrina Chinapaw, Mai J M Ket, Hans C F F An, Qingfan Anand-Kumar, Vinayak Longworth, Giuliana R Chastin, Sebastien Altenburg, Teatske M |
author_facet | Messiha, Katrina Chinapaw, Mai J M Ket, Hans C F F An, Qingfan Anand-Kumar, Vinayak Longworth, Giuliana R Chastin, Sebastien Altenburg, Teatske M |
author_sort | Messiha, Katrina |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: There is a need to systematically identify and summarize the contemporary theories and theoretical frameworks used for co-creation, co-design and co-production in public health research. METHODS: The reporting of this systematic review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Given substantial interest in and application of co-creation, co-design and co-production, we searched PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus and APA PsycINFO from 2012 to March–April 2022. A quality assessment and data extraction for theory content was performed. RESULTS: Of the 3763 unique references identified through the comprehensive search strategy, 10 articles were included in the review: four articles named co-creation, two articles named co-creation and co-design, two articles named co-production and co-design, and two articles named co-design. Empowerment Theory was employed by two articles, whereas other theories (n = 5) or frameworks (n = 3) were employed by one article each. For the quality assessment, eight articles received a strong rating and two articles received a moderate rating. CONCLUSION: There is little indication of theory applications for the approaches of co-creation, co-design and co-production in public health since 2012, given 10 articles were included in this review. Yet, the theories described in these 10 articles can be useful for developing such co-approaches in future public health research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10470345 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104703452023-09-01 Systematic Review of Contemporary Theories Used for Co-creation, Co-design and Co-production in Public Health Messiha, Katrina Chinapaw, Mai J M Ket, Hans C F F An, Qingfan Anand-Kumar, Vinayak Longworth, Giuliana R Chastin, Sebastien Altenburg, Teatske M J Public Health (Oxf) Original Article BACKGROUND: There is a need to systematically identify and summarize the contemporary theories and theoretical frameworks used for co-creation, co-design and co-production in public health research. METHODS: The reporting of this systematic review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Given substantial interest in and application of co-creation, co-design and co-production, we searched PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus and APA PsycINFO from 2012 to March–April 2022. A quality assessment and data extraction for theory content was performed. RESULTS: Of the 3763 unique references identified through the comprehensive search strategy, 10 articles were included in the review: four articles named co-creation, two articles named co-creation and co-design, two articles named co-production and co-design, and two articles named co-design. Empowerment Theory was employed by two articles, whereas other theories (n = 5) or frameworks (n = 3) were employed by one article each. For the quality assessment, eight articles received a strong rating and two articles received a moderate rating. CONCLUSION: There is little indication of theory applications for the approaches of co-creation, co-design and co-production in public health since 2012, given 10 articles were included in this review. Yet, the theories described in these 10 articles can be useful for developing such co-approaches in future public health research. Oxford University Press 2023-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10470345/ /pubmed/37147918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdad046 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Faculty of Public Health. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Messiha, Katrina Chinapaw, Mai J M Ket, Hans C F F An, Qingfan Anand-Kumar, Vinayak Longworth, Giuliana R Chastin, Sebastien Altenburg, Teatske M Systematic Review of Contemporary Theories Used for Co-creation, Co-design and Co-production in Public Health |
title | Systematic Review of Contemporary Theories Used for Co-creation, Co-design and Co-production in Public Health |
title_full | Systematic Review of Contemporary Theories Used for Co-creation, Co-design and Co-production in Public Health |
title_fullStr | Systematic Review of Contemporary Theories Used for Co-creation, Co-design and Co-production in Public Health |
title_full_unstemmed | Systematic Review of Contemporary Theories Used for Co-creation, Co-design and Co-production in Public Health |
title_short | Systematic Review of Contemporary Theories Used for Co-creation, Co-design and Co-production in Public Health |
title_sort | systematic review of contemporary theories used for co-creation, co-design and co-production in public health |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10470345/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37147918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdad046 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT messihakatrina systematicreviewofcontemporarytheoriesusedforcocreationcodesignandcoproductioninpublichealth AT chinapawmaijm systematicreviewofcontemporarytheoriesusedforcocreationcodesignandcoproductioninpublichealth AT kethanscff systematicreviewofcontemporarytheoriesusedforcocreationcodesignandcoproductioninpublichealth AT anqingfan systematicreviewofcontemporarytheoriesusedforcocreationcodesignandcoproductioninpublichealth AT anandkumarvinayak systematicreviewofcontemporarytheoriesusedforcocreationcodesignandcoproductioninpublichealth AT longworthgiulianar systematicreviewofcontemporarytheoriesusedforcocreationcodesignandcoproductioninpublichealth AT chastinsebastien systematicreviewofcontemporarytheoriesusedforcocreationcodesignandcoproductioninpublichealth AT altenburgteatskem systematicreviewofcontemporarytheoriesusedforcocreationcodesignandcoproductioninpublichealth |