Cargando…

Systematic Review of Contemporary Theories Used for Co-creation, Co-design and Co-production in Public Health

BACKGROUND: There is a need to systematically identify and summarize the contemporary theories and theoretical frameworks used for co-creation, co-design and co-production in public health research. METHODS: The reporting of this systematic review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Messiha, Katrina, Chinapaw, Mai J M, Ket, Hans C F F, An, Qingfan, Anand-Kumar, Vinayak, Longworth, Giuliana R, Chastin, Sebastien, Altenburg, Teatske M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10470345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37147918
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdad046
_version_ 1785099660249006080
author Messiha, Katrina
Chinapaw, Mai J M
Ket, Hans C F F
An, Qingfan
Anand-Kumar, Vinayak
Longworth, Giuliana R
Chastin, Sebastien
Altenburg, Teatske M
author_facet Messiha, Katrina
Chinapaw, Mai J M
Ket, Hans C F F
An, Qingfan
Anand-Kumar, Vinayak
Longworth, Giuliana R
Chastin, Sebastien
Altenburg, Teatske M
author_sort Messiha, Katrina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is a need to systematically identify and summarize the contemporary theories and theoretical frameworks used for co-creation, co-design and co-production in public health research. METHODS: The reporting of this systematic review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Given substantial interest in and application of co-creation, co-design and co-production, we searched PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus and APA PsycINFO from 2012 to March–April 2022. A quality assessment and data extraction for theory content was performed. RESULTS: Of the 3763 unique references identified through the comprehensive search strategy, 10 articles were included in the review: four articles named co-creation, two articles named co-creation and co-design, two articles named co-production and co-design, and two articles named co-design. Empowerment Theory was employed by two articles, whereas other theories (n = 5) or frameworks (n = 3) were employed by one article each. For the quality assessment, eight articles received a strong rating and two articles received a moderate rating. CONCLUSION: There is little indication of theory applications for the approaches of co-creation, co-design and co-production in public health since 2012, given 10 articles were included in this review. Yet, the theories described in these 10 articles can be useful for developing such co-approaches in future public health research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10470345
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104703452023-09-01 Systematic Review of Contemporary Theories Used for Co-creation, Co-design and Co-production in Public Health Messiha, Katrina Chinapaw, Mai J M Ket, Hans C F F An, Qingfan Anand-Kumar, Vinayak Longworth, Giuliana R Chastin, Sebastien Altenburg, Teatske M J Public Health (Oxf) Original Article BACKGROUND: There is a need to systematically identify and summarize the contemporary theories and theoretical frameworks used for co-creation, co-design and co-production in public health research. METHODS: The reporting of this systematic review follows the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses. Given substantial interest in and application of co-creation, co-design and co-production, we searched PubMed, CINAHL, Scopus and APA PsycINFO from 2012 to March–April 2022. A quality assessment and data extraction for theory content was performed. RESULTS: Of the 3763 unique references identified through the comprehensive search strategy, 10 articles were included in the review: four articles named co-creation, two articles named co-creation and co-design, two articles named co-production and co-design, and two articles named co-design. Empowerment Theory was employed by two articles, whereas other theories (n = 5) or frameworks (n = 3) were employed by one article each. For the quality assessment, eight articles received a strong rating and two articles received a moderate rating. CONCLUSION: There is little indication of theory applications for the approaches of co-creation, co-design and co-production in public health since 2012, given 10 articles were included in this review. Yet, the theories described in these 10 articles can be useful for developing such co-approaches in future public health research. Oxford University Press 2023-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10470345/ /pubmed/37147918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdad046 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Faculty of Public Health. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Messiha, Katrina
Chinapaw, Mai J M
Ket, Hans C F F
An, Qingfan
Anand-Kumar, Vinayak
Longworth, Giuliana R
Chastin, Sebastien
Altenburg, Teatske M
Systematic Review of Contemporary Theories Used for Co-creation, Co-design and Co-production in Public Health
title Systematic Review of Contemporary Theories Used for Co-creation, Co-design and Co-production in Public Health
title_full Systematic Review of Contemporary Theories Used for Co-creation, Co-design and Co-production in Public Health
title_fullStr Systematic Review of Contemporary Theories Used for Co-creation, Co-design and Co-production in Public Health
title_full_unstemmed Systematic Review of Contemporary Theories Used for Co-creation, Co-design and Co-production in Public Health
title_short Systematic Review of Contemporary Theories Used for Co-creation, Co-design and Co-production in Public Health
title_sort systematic review of contemporary theories used for co-creation, co-design and co-production in public health
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10470345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37147918
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdad046
work_keys_str_mv AT messihakatrina systematicreviewofcontemporarytheoriesusedforcocreationcodesignandcoproductioninpublichealth
AT chinapawmaijm systematicreviewofcontemporarytheoriesusedforcocreationcodesignandcoproductioninpublichealth
AT kethanscff systematicreviewofcontemporarytheoriesusedforcocreationcodesignandcoproductioninpublichealth
AT anqingfan systematicreviewofcontemporarytheoriesusedforcocreationcodesignandcoproductioninpublichealth
AT anandkumarvinayak systematicreviewofcontemporarytheoriesusedforcocreationcodesignandcoproductioninpublichealth
AT longworthgiulianar systematicreviewofcontemporarytheoriesusedforcocreationcodesignandcoproductioninpublichealth
AT chastinsebastien systematicreviewofcontemporarytheoriesusedforcocreationcodesignandcoproductioninpublichealth
AT altenburgteatskem systematicreviewofcontemporarytheoriesusedforcocreationcodesignandcoproductioninpublichealth