Cargando…

Psychosocial predictors of COVID-19 infection in UK biobank (N = 104 201)

BACKGROUND: Since the outbreak of COVID-19, data on its psychosocial predictors are limited. We therefore aimed to explore psychosocial predictors of COVID-19 infection at the UK Biobank (UKB). METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study conducted among UKB participants. RESULTS: The sample size wa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wauye, Victor M, Ho, Frederick K, Lyall, Donald M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10470346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37144429
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdad009
_version_ 1785099660496470016
author Wauye, Victor M
Ho, Frederick K
Lyall, Donald M
author_facet Wauye, Victor M
Ho, Frederick K
Lyall, Donald M
author_sort Wauye, Victor M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Since the outbreak of COVID-19, data on its psychosocial predictors are limited. We therefore aimed to explore psychosocial predictors of COVID-19 infection at the UK Biobank (UKB). METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study conducted among UKB participants. RESULTS: The sample size was N = 104 201, out of which 14 852 (14.3%) had a positive COVID-19 test. The whole sample analysis showed significant interactions between sex and several predictor variables. Among females, absence of college/university degree [odds ratio (OR) 1.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.45–1.66] and socioeconomic deprivation (OR 1.16 95% CI 1.11–1.21) were associated with higher odds of COVID-19 infection, while history of psychiatric consultation (OR 0.85 95% CI 0.77–0.94) with lower odds. Among males, absence of college/university degree (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.45–1.68) and socioeconomic deprivation (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.07–1.16) were associated with higher odds, while loneliness (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78–0.97), irritability (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.83–0.99) and history of psychiatric consultation (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.75–0.97) were associated with lower odds. CONCLUSION: Sociodemographic factors predicted the odds of COVID-19 infection equally among male and female participants, while psychological factors had differential impacts.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10470346
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104703462023-09-01 Psychosocial predictors of COVID-19 infection in UK biobank (N = 104 201) Wauye, Victor M Ho, Frederick K Lyall, Donald M J Public Health (Oxf) Original Article BACKGROUND: Since the outbreak of COVID-19, data on its psychosocial predictors are limited. We therefore aimed to explore psychosocial predictors of COVID-19 infection at the UK Biobank (UKB). METHODS: This was a prospective cohort study conducted among UKB participants. RESULTS: The sample size was N = 104 201, out of which 14 852 (14.3%) had a positive COVID-19 test. The whole sample analysis showed significant interactions between sex and several predictor variables. Among females, absence of college/university degree [odds ratio (OR) 1.55, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.45–1.66] and socioeconomic deprivation (OR 1.16 95% CI 1.11–1.21) were associated with higher odds of COVID-19 infection, while history of psychiatric consultation (OR 0.85 95% CI 0.77–0.94) with lower odds. Among males, absence of college/university degree (OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.45–1.68) and socioeconomic deprivation (OR 1.12, 95% CI 1.07–1.16) were associated with higher odds, while loneliness (OR 0.87, 95% CI 0.78–0.97), irritability (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.83–0.99) and history of psychiatric consultation (OR 0.85, 95% CI 0.75–0.97) were associated with lower odds. CONCLUSION: Sociodemographic factors predicted the odds of COVID-19 infection equally among male and female participants, while psychological factors had differential impacts. Oxford University Press 2023-04-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10470346/ /pubmed/37144429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdad009 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Faculty of Public Health. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Wauye, Victor M
Ho, Frederick K
Lyall, Donald M
Psychosocial predictors of COVID-19 infection in UK biobank (N = 104 201)
title Psychosocial predictors of COVID-19 infection in UK biobank (N = 104 201)
title_full Psychosocial predictors of COVID-19 infection in UK biobank (N = 104 201)
title_fullStr Psychosocial predictors of COVID-19 infection in UK biobank (N = 104 201)
title_full_unstemmed Psychosocial predictors of COVID-19 infection in UK biobank (N = 104 201)
title_short Psychosocial predictors of COVID-19 infection in UK biobank (N = 104 201)
title_sort psychosocial predictors of covid-19 infection in uk biobank (n = 104 201)
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10470346/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37144429
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdad009
work_keys_str_mv AT wauyevictorm psychosocialpredictorsofcovid19infectioninukbiobankn104201
AT hofrederickk psychosocialpredictorsofcovid19infectioninukbiobankn104201
AT lyalldonaldm psychosocialpredictorsofcovid19infectioninukbiobankn104201