Cargando…

Posterior oblique technique for sacroiliac joint fusion leads to greater pain relief and similar improvement in function compared to the lateral technique: A retrospective, comparative study

BACKGROUND: Management of chronic sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain among patients who do not respond to nonsurgical treatment is increasingly turning toward minimally invasive SIJ fusion. There are different techniques available to perform this procedure, with the lateral technique being more commonly st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cahueque, Mario, Grajeda, Javier, Ardebol, Javier, Azmitia, Enrique
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10470410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37662689
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xnsj.2023.100259
_version_ 1785099673239814144
author Cahueque, Mario
Grajeda, Javier
Ardebol, Javier
Azmitia, Enrique
author_facet Cahueque, Mario
Grajeda, Javier
Ardebol, Javier
Azmitia, Enrique
author_sort Cahueque, Mario
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Management of chronic sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain among patients who do not respond to nonsurgical treatment is increasingly turning toward minimally invasive SIJ fusion. There are different techniques available to perform this procedure, with the lateral technique being more commonly studied than the posterior oblique technique. This study examined the effects of these techniques on pain relief and functional improvement, both preoperatively and at a 12-month follow-up. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from 45 patients who underwent SIJ fusion. Included patients were ≥50 years old, nonresponsive to conservative treatment. Subjects were divided into 2 cohorts based on the SIJ fusion technique. Primary outcomes were pain relief, measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and functional improvement, determined by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI); both were recorded and assessed at baseline, postoperative, and the change from pre- to postoperative. Additionally, data regarding patient demographics, previous lumbar fusion, operative time, and duration of hospital stay were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Baseline demographic and clinical variables exhibited no significant differences in distribution between groups. The posterior oblique cohort demonstrated a substantial reduction in operative time (over 50%) and duration of hospital stay compared to lateral cohort. Pain relief (postoperative VAS: lateral 3.5±1.7 vs. posterior oblique 2.4±1.5 [p=.02]) and functional improvement (postoperative ODI: lateral 29.6±7.3 vs. posterior oblique 21±5.7 [p≤.001]) were significantly better in the posterior oblique group. Pre- to postoperative improvement analysis indicated greater reduction in pain (VAS: lateral −4.4±1.9 vs. posterior oblique −6.1±1.5 [p=.002]) in the posterior oblique group. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the lateral technique group, patients undergoing minimally invasive SIJ fusion through the posterior oblique technique experienced greater pain relief and demonstrated a trend toward better functional improvement, with shorter operative times and duration of hospital stay. The posterior oblique technique may be more efficient and beneficial to manage patients suffering from chronic SIJ pain through joint fusion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10470410
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104704102023-09-01 Posterior oblique technique for sacroiliac joint fusion leads to greater pain relief and similar improvement in function compared to the lateral technique: A retrospective, comparative study Cahueque, Mario Grajeda, Javier Ardebol, Javier Azmitia, Enrique N Am Spine Soc J Clinical Studies BACKGROUND: Management of chronic sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain among patients who do not respond to nonsurgical treatment is increasingly turning toward minimally invasive SIJ fusion. There are different techniques available to perform this procedure, with the lateral technique being more commonly studied than the posterior oblique technique. This study examined the effects of these techniques on pain relief and functional improvement, both preoperatively and at a 12-month follow-up. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed data from 45 patients who underwent SIJ fusion. Included patients were ≥50 years old, nonresponsive to conservative treatment. Subjects were divided into 2 cohorts based on the SIJ fusion technique. Primary outcomes were pain relief, measured by Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and functional improvement, determined by the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI); both were recorded and assessed at baseline, postoperative, and the change from pre- to postoperative. Additionally, data regarding patient demographics, previous lumbar fusion, operative time, and duration of hospital stay were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: Baseline demographic and clinical variables exhibited no significant differences in distribution between groups. The posterior oblique cohort demonstrated a substantial reduction in operative time (over 50%) and duration of hospital stay compared to lateral cohort. Pain relief (postoperative VAS: lateral 3.5±1.7 vs. posterior oblique 2.4±1.5 [p=.02]) and functional improvement (postoperative ODI: lateral 29.6±7.3 vs. posterior oblique 21±5.7 [p≤.001]) were significantly better in the posterior oblique group. Pre- to postoperative improvement analysis indicated greater reduction in pain (VAS: lateral −4.4±1.9 vs. posterior oblique −6.1±1.5 [p=.002]) in the posterior oblique group. CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the lateral technique group, patients undergoing minimally invasive SIJ fusion through the posterior oblique technique experienced greater pain relief and demonstrated a trend toward better functional improvement, with shorter operative times and duration of hospital stay. The posterior oblique technique may be more efficient and beneficial to manage patients suffering from chronic SIJ pain through joint fusion. Elsevier 2023-08-05 /pmc/articles/PMC10470410/ /pubmed/37662689 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xnsj.2023.100259 Text en © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Clinical Studies
Cahueque, Mario
Grajeda, Javier
Ardebol, Javier
Azmitia, Enrique
Posterior oblique technique for sacroiliac joint fusion leads to greater pain relief and similar improvement in function compared to the lateral technique: A retrospective, comparative study
title Posterior oblique technique for sacroiliac joint fusion leads to greater pain relief and similar improvement in function compared to the lateral technique: A retrospective, comparative study
title_full Posterior oblique technique for sacroiliac joint fusion leads to greater pain relief and similar improvement in function compared to the lateral technique: A retrospective, comparative study
title_fullStr Posterior oblique technique for sacroiliac joint fusion leads to greater pain relief and similar improvement in function compared to the lateral technique: A retrospective, comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Posterior oblique technique for sacroiliac joint fusion leads to greater pain relief and similar improvement in function compared to the lateral technique: A retrospective, comparative study
title_short Posterior oblique technique for sacroiliac joint fusion leads to greater pain relief and similar improvement in function compared to the lateral technique: A retrospective, comparative study
title_sort posterior oblique technique for sacroiliac joint fusion leads to greater pain relief and similar improvement in function compared to the lateral technique: a retrospective, comparative study
topic Clinical Studies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10470410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37662689
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.xnsj.2023.100259
work_keys_str_mv AT cahuequemario posteriorobliquetechniqueforsacroiliacjointfusionleadstogreaterpainreliefandsimilarimprovementinfunctioncomparedtothelateraltechniquearetrospectivecomparativestudy
AT grajedajavier posteriorobliquetechniqueforsacroiliacjointfusionleadstogreaterpainreliefandsimilarimprovementinfunctioncomparedtothelateraltechniquearetrospectivecomparativestudy
AT ardeboljavier posteriorobliquetechniqueforsacroiliacjointfusionleadstogreaterpainreliefandsimilarimprovementinfunctioncomparedtothelateraltechniquearetrospectivecomparativestudy
AT azmitiaenrique posteriorobliquetechniqueforsacroiliacjointfusionleadstogreaterpainreliefandsimilarimprovementinfunctioncomparedtothelateraltechniquearetrospectivecomparativestudy