Cargando…
Comparison between pressure-controlled and manual ventilation during anesthetic induction in patients with expected difficult airway: A prospective randomized controlled trial
BACKGROUND: Gastric insufflation can cause gastric regurgitation, which may be exacerbated in patients who are expected to have difficult airways. The purpose of this study was to investigate the difference in respiratory parameters and the frequency of gastric insufflation according to the ventilat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10470681/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37653750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000035007 |
_version_ | 1785099733890498560 |
---|---|
author | Park, Jeong Jun Seong, Hyunyoung Huh, Hyub Kwak, Ji Soo Park, Heechan Yoon, Seung Zhoo Cho, Jang Eun |
author_facet | Park, Jeong Jun Seong, Hyunyoung Huh, Hyub Kwak, Ji Soo Park, Heechan Yoon, Seung Zhoo Cho, Jang Eun |
author_sort | Park, Jeong Jun |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Gastric insufflation can cause gastric regurgitation, which may be exacerbated in patients who are expected to have difficult airways. The purpose of this study was to investigate the difference in respiratory parameters and the frequency of gastric insufflation according to the ventilation mode during the anesthestic induction on patients who were predicted to have difficult facemask ventilation. METHODS: A total of eighty patients with expected airway difficulties were included. Patient were allocated to 2 groups (n = 40 each). In the manual ventilation group, ventilation was performed by putting a mask on the patient’s face with 1-hand and adjusting the pressure limiting valve to 15 cm H(2)O. In the pressure-controlled ventilation group, a mask was held in place using 2-handed jaw-thrust maneuver. The pressure-controlled ventilation was applied and peak inspiration pressure was adjusted to achieve a tidal volume of 6 to 8 mL/kg. The primary outcome was the difference of the peak airway pressure between 2 groups every 30 seconds for 120 seconds duration of mask ventilation. We also evaluated respiratory variables including peak airway pressure, End-tidal carbon dioxide and also gastric insufflation using ultrasonography. RESULTS: The pressure-controlled ventilation group demonstrated lower peak airway pressure than the manual ventilation group (P = .005). End-tidal carbon dioxide was higher in the pressure-controlled ventilation group (P = .012). The incidence of gastric insufflation assessed by real-time ultrasonography of the gastric antrum was higher in the manual ventilation group than in the pressure-controlled ventilation group [3 (7.5%) vs 17 (42.5%), risk ratio (95% confidence interval): 0.06 to 0.56, P = .003]. CONCLUSIONS: Pressure-controlled ventilation during facemask ventilation in patients who were expected to have difficult airways showed a lower gastric insufflation rate with low peak airway pressure compared to manual ventilation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10470681 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104706812023-09-01 Comparison between pressure-controlled and manual ventilation during anesthetic induction in patients with expected difficult airway: A prospective randomized controlled trial Park, Jeong Jun Seong, Hyunyoung Huh, Hyub Kwak, Ji Soo Park, Heechan Yoon, Seung Zhoo Cho, Jang Eun Medicine (Baltimore) 3300 BACKGROUND: Gastric insufflation can cause gastric regurgitation, which may be exacerbated in patients who are expected to have difficult airways. The purpose of this study was to investigate the difference in respiratory parameters and the frequency of gastric insufflation according to the ventilation mode during the anesthestic induction on patients who were predicted to have difficult facemask ventilation. METHODS: A total of eighty patients with expected airway difficulties were included. Patient were allocated to 2 groups (n = 40 each). In the manual ventilation group, ventilation was performed by putting a mask on the patient’s face with 1-hand and adjusting the pressure limiting valve to 15 cm H(2)O. In the pressure-controlled ventilation group, a mask was held in place using 2-handed jaw-thrust maneuver. The pressure-controlled ventilation was applied and peak inspiration pressure was adjusted to achieve a tidal volume of 6 to 8 mL/kg. The primary outcome was the difference of the peak airway pressure between 2 groups every 30 seconds for 120 seconds duration of mask ventilation. We also evaluated respiratory variables including peak airway pressure, End-tidal carbon dioxide and also gastric insufflation using ultrasonography. RESULTS: The pressure-controlled ventilation group demonstrated lower peak airway pressure than the manual ventilation group (P = .005). End-tidal carbon dioxide was higher in the pressure-controlled ventilation group (P = .012). The incidence of gastric insufflation assessed by real-time ultrasonography of the gastric antrum was higher in the manual ventilation group than in the pressure-controlled ventilation group [3 (7.5%) vs 17 (42.5%), risk ratio (95% confidence interval): 0.06 to 0.56, P = .003]. CONCLUSIONS: Pressure-controlled ventilation during facemask ventilation in patients who were expected to have difficult airways showed a lower gastric insufflation rate with low peak airway pressure compared to manual ventilation. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10470681/ /pubmed/37653750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000035007 Text en Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal. |
spellingShingle | 3300 Park, Jeong Jun Seong, Hyunyoung Huh, Hyub Kwak, Ji Soo Park, Heechan Yoon, Seung Zhoo Cho, Jang Eun Comparison between pressure-controlled and manual ventilation during anesthetic induction in patients with expected difficult airway: A prospective randomized controlled trial |
title | Comparison between pressure-controlled and manual ventilation during anesthetic induction in patients with expected difficult airway: A prospective randomized controlled trial |
title_full | Comparison between pressure-controlled and manual ventilation during anesthetic induction in patients with expected difficult airway: A prospective randomized controlled trial |
title_fullStr | Comparison between pressure-controlled and manual ventilation during anesthetic induction in patients with expected difficult airway: A prospective randomized controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison between pressure-controlled and manual ventilation during anesthetic induction in patients with expected difficult airway: A prospective randomized controlled trial |
title_short | Comparison between pressure-controlled and manual ventilation during anesthetic induction in patients with expected difficult airway: A prospective randomized controlled trial |
title_sort | comparison between pressure-controlled and manual ventilation during anesthetic induction in patients with expected difficult airway: a prospective randomized controlled trial |
topic | 3300 |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10470681/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37653750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000035007 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parkjeongjun comparisonbetweenpressurecontrolledandmanualventilationduringanestheticinductioninpatientswithexpecteddifficultairwayaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT seonghyunyoung comparisonbetweenpressurecontrolledandmanualventilationduringanestheticinductioninpatientswithexpecteddifficultairwayaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT huhhyub comparisonbetweenpressurecontrolledandmanualventilationduringanestheticinductioninpatientswithexpecteddifficultairwayaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kwakjisoo comparisonbetweenpressurecontrolledandmanualventilationduringanestheticinductioninpatientswithexpecteddifficultairwayaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT parkheechan comparisonbetweenpressurecontrolledandmanualventilationduringanestheticinductioninpatientswithexpecteddifficultairwayaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT yoonseungzhoo comparisonbetweenpressurecontrolledandmanualventilationduringanestheticinductioninpatientswithexpecteddifficultairwayaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial AT chojangeun comparisonbetweenpressurecontrolledandmanualventilationduringanestheticinductioninpatientswithexpecteddifficultairwayaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial |