Cargando…

Comparison between pressure-controlled and manual ventilation during anesthetic induction in patients with expected difficult airway: A prospective randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Gastric insufflation can cause gastric regurgitation, which may be exacerbated in patients who are expected to have difficult airways. The purpose of this study was to investigate the difference in respiratory parameters and the frequency of gastric insufflation according to the ventilat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Park, Jeong Jun, Seong, Hyunyoung, Huh, Hyub, Kwak, Ji Soo, Park, Heechan, Yoon, Seung Zhoo, Cho, Jang Eun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10470681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37653750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000035007
_version_ 1785099733890498560
author Park, Jeong Jun
Seong, Hyunyoung
Huh, Hyub
Kwak, Ji Soo
Park, Heechan
Yoon, Seung Zhoo
Cho, Jang Eun
author_facet Park, Jeong Jun
Seong, Hyunyoung
Huh, Hyub
Kwak, Ji Soo
Park, Heechan
Yoon, Seung Zhoo
Cho, Jang Eun
author_sort Park, Jeong Jun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Gastric insufflation can cause gastric regurgitation, which may be exacerbated in patients who are expected to have difficult airways. The purpose of this study was to investigate the difference in respiratory parameters and the frequency of gastric insufflation according to the ventilation mode during the anesthestic induction on patients who were predicted to have difficult facemask ventilation. METHODS: A total of eighty patients with expected airway difficulties were included. Patient were allocated to 2 groups (n = 40 each). In the manual ventilation group, ventilation was performed by putting a mask on the patient’s face with 1-hand and adjusting the pressure limiting valve to 15 cm H(2)O. In the pressure-controlled ventilation group, a mask was held in place using 2-handed jaw-thrust maneuver. The pressure-controlled ventilation was applied and peak inspiration pressure was adjusted to achieve a tidal volume of 6 to 8 mL/kg. The primary outcome was the difference of the peak airway pressure between 2 groups every 30 seconds for 120 seconds duration of mask ventilation. We also evaluated respiratory variables including peak airway pressure, End-tidal carbon dioxide and also gastric insufflation using ultrasonography. RESULTS: The pressure-controlled ventilation group demonstrated lower peak airway pressure than the manual ventilation group (P = .005). End-tidal carbon dioxide was higher in the pressure-controlled ventilation group (P = .012). The incidence of gastric insufflation assessed by real-time ultrasonography of the gastric antrum was higher in the manual ventilation group than in the pressure-controlled ventilation group [3 (7.5%) vs 17 (42.5%), risk ratio (95% confidence interval): 0.06 to 0.56, P = .003]. CONCLUSIONS: Pressure-controlled ventilation during facemask ventilation in patients who were expected to have difficult airways showed a lower gastric insufflation rate with low peak airway pressure compared to manual ventilation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10470681
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104706812023-09-01 Comparison between pressure-controlled and manual ventilation during anesthetic induction in patients with expected difficult airway: A prospective randomized controlled trial Park, Jeong Jun Seong, Hyunyoung Huh, Hyub Kwak, Ji Soo Park, Heechan Yoon, Seung Zhoo Cho, Jang Eun Medicine (Baltimore) 3300 BACKGROUND: Gastric insufflation can cause gastric regurgitation, which may be exacerbated in patients who are expected to have difficult airways. The purpose of this study was to investigate the difference in respiratory parameters and the frequency of gastric insufflation according to the ventilation mode during the anesthestic induction on patients who were predicted to have difficult facemask ventilation. METHODS: A total of eighty patients with expected airway difficulties were included. Patient were allocated to 2 groups (n = 40 each). In the manual ventilation group, ventilation was performed by putting a mask on the patient’s face with 1-hand and adjusting the pressure limiting valve to 15 cm H(2)O. In the pressure-controlled ventilation group, a mask was held in place using 2-handed jaw-thrust maneuver. The pressure-controlled ventilation was applied and peak inspiration pressure was adjusted to achieve a tidal volume of 6 to 8 mL/kg. The primary outcome was the difference of the peak airway pressure between 2 groups every 30 seconds for 120 seconds duration of mask ventilation. We also evaluated respiratory variables including peak airway pressure, End-tidal carbon dioxide and also gastric insufflation using ultrasonography. RESULTS: The pressure-controlled ventilation group demonstrated lower peak airway pressure than the manual ventilation group (P = .005). End-tidal carbon dioxide was higher in the pressure-controlled ventilation group (P = .012). The incidence of gastric insufflation assessed by real-time ultrasonography of the gastric antrum was higher in the manual ventilation group than in the pressure-controlled ventilation group [3 (7.5%) vs 17 (42.5%), risk ratio (95% confidence interval): 0.06 to 0.56, P = .003]. CONCLUSIONS: Pressure-controlled ventilation during facemask ventilation in patients who were expected to have difficult airways showed a lower gastric insufflation rate with low peak airway pressure compared to manual ventilation. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2023-08-25 /pmc/articles/PMC10470681/ /pubmed/37653750 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000035007 Text en Copyright © 2023 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial License 4.0 (CCBY-NC) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) , where it is permissible to download, share, remix, transform, and buildup the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle 3300
Park, Jeong Jun
Seong, Hyunyoung
Huh, Hyub
Kwak, Ji Soo
Park, Heechan
Yoon, Seung Zhoo
Cho, Jang Eun
Comparison between pressure-controlled and manual ventilation during anesthetic induction in patients with expected difficult airway: A prospective randomized controlled trial
title Comparison between pressure-controlled and manual ventilation during anesthetic induction in patients with expected difficult airway: A prospective randomized controlled trial
title_full Comparison between pressure-controlled and manual ventilation during anesthetic induction in patients with expected difficult airway: A prospective randomized controlled trial
title_fullStr Comparison between pressure-controlled and manual ventilation during anesthetic induction in patients with expected difficult airway: A prospective randomized controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Comparison between pressure-controlled and manual ventilation during anesthetic induction in patients with expected difficult airway: A prospective randomized controlled trial
title_short Comparison between pressure-controlled and manual ventilation during anesthetic induction in patients with expected difficult airway: A prospective randomized controlled trial
title_sort comparison between pressure-controlled and manual ventilation during anesthetic induction in patients with expected difficult airway: a prospective randomized controlled trial
topic 3300
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10470681/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37653750
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000035007
work_keys_str_mv AT parkjeongjun comparisonbetweenpressurecontrolledandmanualventilationduringanestheticinductioninpatientswithexpecteddifficultairwayaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT seonghyunyoung comparisonbetweenpressurecontrolledandmanualventilationduringanestheticinductioninpatientswithexpecteddifficultairwayaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT huhhyub comparisonbetweenpressurecontrolledandmanualventilationduringanestheticinductioninpatientswithexpecteddifficultairwayaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kwakjisoo comparisonbetweenpressurecontrolledandmanualventilationduringanestheticinductioninpatientswithexpecteddifficultairwayaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT parkheechan comparisonbetweenpressurecontrolledandmanualventilationduringanestheticinductioninpatientswithexpecteddifficultairwayaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT yoonseungzhoo comparisonbetweenpressurecontrolledandmanualventilationduringanestheticinductioninpatientswithexpecteddifficultairwayaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chojangeun comparisonbetweenpressurecontrolledandmanualventilationduringanestheticinductioninpatientswithexpecteddifficultairwayaprospectiverandomizedcontrolledtrial