Cargando…

Use of preferred contraceptive method among young adults in Texas and California: A comparison by state and insurance coverage

BACKGROUND: Young people’s ability to use their preferred contraceptive method is an indicator of reproductive autonomy and healthcare access. State policies can hinder or facilitate access to a preferred contraceptive method. OBJECTIVE: This study compared use of preferred contraceptive method in T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hopkins, Kristine, Yarger, Jennifer, Rossetto, Irene, Sanchez, Audrey, Brown, Elisa, Elmes, Sarah, Mantaro, Thaddeus, White, Kari, Harper, Cynthia C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10470945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37651402
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290726
_version_ 1785099795736559616
author Hopkins, Kristine
Yarger, Jennifer
Rossetto, Irene
Sanchez, Audrey
Brown, Elisa
Elmes, Sarah
Mantaro, Thaddeus
White, Kari
Harper, Cynthia C.
author_facet Hopkins, Kristine
Yarger, Jennifer
Rossetto, Irene
Sanchez, Audrey
Brown, Elisa
Elmes, Sarah
Mantaro, Thaddeus
White, Kari
Harper, Cynthia C.
author_sort Hopkins, Kristine
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Young people’s ability to use their preferred contraceptive method is an indicator of reproductive autonomy and healthcare access. State policies can hinder or facilitate access to a preferred contraceptive method. OBJECTIVE: This study compared use of preferred contraceptive method in Texas and California, states with contrasting health policy contexts that impact health insurance coverage and access to subsidized family planning services. METHODS: We used baseline survey data from an ongoing cluster randomized controlled trial of sexually active students, assigned female at birth, ages 18–25, at 29 community colleges in Texas and California (N = 1,974). We described contraceptive preferences and use, as well as reasons for nonuse of a preferred method. We conducted multivariable-adjusted mixed-effects logistic regression analyses for clustered data, and then calculated the predicted probability of using a preferred contraceptive method in Texas and California by insurance status. RESULTS: More Texas participants were uninsured than Californians (30% vs. 8%, p<0.001). Thirty-six percent of Texas participants were using their preferred contraceptive method compared to 51% of Californians. After multivariable adjustments, Texas participants had lower odds of using their preferred method (adjusted odds ratio = 0.62, 95% confidence interval = 0.48–0.81) compared to those in California. Texas participants in all insurance categories had a lower predicted probability of preferred method use compared to California participants. In Texas, we found a 12.1 percentage-point difference in the predicted probability of preferred method use between the uninsured (27.5%) and insured (39.6%) (p<0.001). Texans reported financial barriers to using their preferred method more often than Californians (36.7% vs. 19.2%, p<0.001) as did the uninsured compared to the insured (50.9% vs. 18.7%, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: These findings present new evidence that state of residence plays an important role in young people’s ability to realize their contraceptive preference. Young people in Texas, with lower insurance coverage and more limited access to safety net programs for contraceptive care than in California, have lower use of preferred contraception. It has become urgent in states with abortion bans to support young people’s access to their preferred methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10470945
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104709452023-09-01 Use of preferred contraceptive method among young adults in Texas and California: A comparison by state and insurance coverage Hopkins, Kristine Yarger, Jennifer Rossetto, Irene Sanchez, Audrey Brown, Elisa Elmes, Sarah Mantaro, Thaddeus White, Kari Harper, Cynthia C. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Young people’s ability to use their preferred contraceptive method is an indicator of reproductive autonomy and healthcare access. State policies can hinder or facilitate access to a preferred contraceptive method. OBJECTIVE: This study compared use of preferred contraceptive method in Texas and California, states with contrasting health policy contexts that impact health insurance coverage and access to subsidized family planning services. METHODS: We used baseline survey data from an ongoing cluster randomized controlled trial of sexually active students, assigned female at birth, ages 18–25, at 29 community colleges in Texas and California (N = 1,974). We described contraceptive preferences and use, as well as reasons for nonuse of a preferred method. We conducted multivariable-adjusted mixed-effects logistic regression analyses for clustered data, and then calculated the predicted probability of using a preferred contraceptive method in Texas and California by insurance status. RESULTS: More Texas participants were uninsured than Californians (30% vs. 8%, p<0.001). Thirty-six percent of Texas participants were using their preferred contraceptive method compared to 51% of Californians. After multivariable adjustments, Texas participants had lower odds of using their preferred method (adjusted odds ratio = 0.62, 95% confidence interval = 0.48–0.81) compared to those in California. Texas participants in all insurance categories had a lower predicted probability of preferred method use compared to California participants. In Texas, we found a 12.1 percentage-point difference in the predicted probability of preferred method use between the uninsured (27.5%) and insured (39.6%) (p<0.001). Texans reported financial barriers to using their preferred method more often than Californians (36.7% vs. 19.2%, p<0.001) as did the uninsured compared to the insured (50.9% vs. 18.7%, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: These findings present new evidence that state of residence plays an important role in young people’s ability to realize their contraceptive preference. Young people in Texas, with lower insurance coverage and more limited access to safety net programs for contraceptive care than in California, have lower use of preferred contraception. It has become urgent in states with abortion bans to support young people’s access to their preferred methods. Public Library of Science 2023-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10470945/ /pubmed/37651402 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290726 Text en © 2023 Hopkins et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hopkins, Kristine
Yarger, Jennifer
Rossetto, Irene
Sanchez, Audrey
Brown, Elisa
Elmes, Sarah
Mantaro, Thaddeus
White, Kari
Harper, Cynthia C.
Use of preferred contraceptive method among young adults in Texas and California: A comparison by state and insurance coverage
title Use of preferred contraceptive method among young adults in Texas and California: A comparison by state and insurance coverage
title_full Use of preferred contraceptive method among young adults in Texas and California: A comparison by state and insurance coverage
title_fullStr Use of preferred contraceptive method among young adults in Texas and California: A comparison by state and insurance coverage
title_full_unstemmed Use of preferred contraceptive method among young adults in Texas and California: A comparison by state and insurance coverage
title_short Use of preferred contraceptive method among young adults in Texas and California: A comparison by state and insurance coverage
title_sort use of preferred contraceptive method among young adults in texas and california: a comparison by state and insurance coverage
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10470945/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37651402
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290726
work_keys_str_mv AT hopkinskristine useofpreferredcontraceptivemethodamongyoungadultsintexasandcaliforniaacomparisonbystateandinsurancecoverage
AT yargerjennifer useofpreferredcontraceptivemethodamongyoungadultsintexasandcaliforniaacomparisonbystateandinsurancecoverage
AT rossettoirene useofpreferredcontraceptivemethodamongyoungadultsintexasandcaliforniaacomparisonbystateandinsurancecoverage
AT sanchezaudrey useofpreferredcontraceptivemethodamongyoungadultsintexasandcaliforniaacomparisonbystateandinsurancecoverage
AT brownelisa useofpreferredcontraceptivemethodamongyoungadultsintexasandcaliforniaacomparisonbystateandinsurancecoverage
AT elmessarah useofpreferredcontraceptivemethodamongyoungadultsintexasandcaliforniaacomparisonbystateandinsurancecoverage
AT mantarothaddeus useofpreferredcontraceptivemethodamongyoungadultsintexasandcaliforniaacomparisonbystateandinsurancecoverage
AT whitekari useofpreferredcontraceptivemethodamongyoungadultsintexasandcaliforniaacomparisonbystateandinsurancecoverage
AT harpercynthiac useofpreferredcontraceptivemethodamongyoungadultsintexasandcaliforniaacomparisonbystateandinsurancecoverage