Cargando…

Economic Evaluation of Fidaxomicin for the Treatment of Clostridium Difficile Infection (C. difficile-associated diarrhoea) in Ireland

Background: Clostridium difficile is associated with 20–30% of cases of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea. The incidence of C. difficile infection (CDI) is higher in Ireland than in other countries in Europe, and it is associated with considerable morbidity. Previously recommended standard therapeutic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van Engen, Anke, Casamayor, Montserrat, Loftus, Fidelma, Coen, Martin, Garnham, Andy, Watt, Maureen, Lacey, Larry
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Columbia Data Analytics, LLC 2015
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10471417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37663580
http://dx.doi.org/10.36469/9903
_version_ 1785099847075889152
author van Engen, Anke
Casamayor, Montserrat
Loftus, Fidelma
Coen, Martin
Garnham, Andy
Watt, Maureen
Lacey, Larry
author_facet van Engen, Anke
Casamayor, Montserrat
Loftus, Fidelma
Coen, Martin
Garnham, Andy
Watt, Maureen
Lacey, Larry
author_sort van Engen, Anke
collection PubMed
description Background: Clostridium difficile is associated with 20–30% of cases of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea. The incidence of C. difficile infection (CDI) is higher in Ireland than in other countries in Europe, and it is associated with considerable morbidity. Previously recommended standard therapeutic options were vancomycin and metronidazole, but the macrocyclic antibiotic fidaxomicin has recently been recommended for use in adults with CDI in Ireland. Objectives: To perform a cost-utility analysis of fidaxomicin compared to oral metronidazole (used to treat initial non-severe disease and first non-severe recurrence) and oral vancomycin (used to treat severe disease and any non-severe recurrence beyond the first) for the treatment of CDI. Methods: A Markov model was used to determine the cost-utility of fidaxomicin in the treatment of all adult CDI patients (base case), patients with severe CDI and patients with initial CDI recurrences, respectively. Patients enter the model in the CDI health state and are treated either with fidaxomicin or current standard of care (oral metronidazole for non-severe CDI; vancomycin for severe CDI) for 10 days. The time horizon was 1 year. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. Health state utilities were derived from the literature. The perspective was that of the Irish Health Service Executive (HSE). Results: In the base case, fidaxomicin was dominant to current standard-of-care therapy, with cost savings of €2,904 and incremental quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gain of 0.031. The main drivers of costeffectiveness were recurrence rates and cost of hospitalization. Fidaxomicin was also dominant for all patient subgroups. The probability of fidaxomicin being cost-effective in all patients with CDI at a willingness to pay threshold of €45,000 per QALY gained was 82%. Conclusion: Fidaxomicin was dominant to the current standard-of-care therapy for CDI. Based on this analysis, fidaxomicin has received reimbursement for CDI treatment under the High Tech Drug Scheme in Ireland.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10471417
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2015
publisher Columbia Data Analytics, LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104714172023-09-01 Economic Evaluation of Fidaxomicin for the Treatment of Clostridium Difficile Infection (C. difficile-associated diarrhoea) in Ireland van Engen, Anke Casamayor, Montserrat Loftus, Fidelma Coen, Martin Garnham, Andy Watt, Maureen Lacey, Larry J Health Econ Outcomes Res Gastrointestinal Conditions Background: Clostridium difficile is associated with 20–30% of cases of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea. The incidence of C. difficile infection (CDI) is higher in Ireland than in other countries in Europe, and it is associated with considerable morbidity. Previously recommended standard therapeutic options were vancomycin and metronidazole, but the macrocyclic antibiotic fidaxomicin has recently been recommended for use in adults with CDI in Ireland. Objectives: To perform a cost-utility analysis of fidaxomicin compared to oral metronidazole (used to treat initial non-severe disease and first non-severe recurrence) and oral vancomycin (used to treat severe disease and any non-severe recurrence beyond the first) for the treatment of CDI. Methods: A Markov model was used to determine the cost-utility of fidaxomicin in the treatment of all adult CDI patients (base case), patients with severe CDI and patients with initial CDI recurrences, respectively. Patients enter the model in the CDI health state and are treated either with fidaxomicin or current standard of care (oral metronidazole for non-severe CDI; vancomycin for severe CDI) for 10 days. The time horizon was 1 year. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. Health state utilities were derived from the literature. The perspective was that of the Irish Health Service Executive (HSE). Results: In the base case, fidaxomicin was dominant to current standard-of-care therapy, with cost savings of €2,904 and incremental quality-adjusted life year (QALY) gain of 0.031. The main drivers of costeffectiveness were recurrence rates and cost of hospitalization. Fidaxomicin was also dominant for all patient subgroups. The probability of fidaxomicin being cost-effective in all patients with CDI at a willingness to pay threshold of €45,000 per QALY gained was 82%. Conclusion: Fidaxomicin was dominant to the current standard-of-care therapy for CDI. Based on this analysis, fidaxomicin has received reimbursement for CDI treatment under the High Tech Drug Scheme in Ireland. Columbia Data Analytics, LLC 2015-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC10471417/ /pubmed/37663580 http://dx.doi.org/10.36469/9903 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (4.0) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Gastrointestinal Conditions
van Engen, Anke
Casamayor, Montserrat
Loftus, Fidelma
Coen, Martin
Garnham, Andy
Watt, Maureen
Lacey, Larry
Economic Evaluation of Fidaxomicin for the Treatment of Clostridium Difficile Infection (C. difficile-associated diarrhoea) in Ireland
title Economic Evaluation of Fidaxomicin for the Treatment of Clostridium Difficile Infection (C. difficile-associated diarrhoea) in Ireland
title_full Economic Evaluation of Fidaxomicin for the Treatment of Clostridium Difficile Infection (C. difficile-associated diarrhoea) in Ireland
title_fullStr Economic Evaluation of Fidaxomicin for the Treatment of Clostridium Difficile Infection (C. difficile-associated diarrhoea) in Ireland
title_full_unstemmed Economic Evaluation of Fidaxomicin for the Treatment of Clostridium Difficile Infection (C. difficile-associated diarrhoea) in Ireland
title_short Economic Evaluation of Fidaxomicin for the Treatment of Clostridium Difficile Infection (C. difficile-associated diarrhoea) in Ireland
title_sort economic evaluation of fidaxomicin for the treatment of clostridium difficile infection (c. difficile-associated diarrhoea) in ireland
topic Gastrointestinal Conditions
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10471417/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37663580
http://dx.doi.org/10.36469/9903
work_keys_str_mv AT vanengenanke economicevaluationoffidaxomicinforthetreatmentofclostridiumdifficileinfectioncdifficileassociateddiarrhoeainireland
AT casamayormontserrat economicevaluationoffidaxomicinforthetreatmentofclostridiumdifficileinfectioncdifficileassociateddiarrhoeainireland
AT loftusfidelma economicevaluationoffidaxomicinforthetreatmentofclostridiumdifficileinfectioncdifficileassociateddiarrhoeainireland
AT coenmartin economicevaluationoffidaxomicinforthetreatmentofclostridiumdifficileinfectioncdifficileassociateddiarrhoeainireland
AT garnhamandy economicevaluationoffidaxomicinforthetreatmentofclostridiumdifficileinfectioncdifficileassociateddiarrhoeainireland
AT wattmaureen economicevaluationoffidaxomicinforthetreatmentofclostridiumdifficileinfectioncdifficileassociateddiarrhoeainireland
AT laceylarry economicevaluationoffidaxomicinforthetreatmentofclostridiumdifficileinfectioncdifficileassociateddiarrhoeainireland