Cargando…

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Antimicrobial Prescribing in the Treatment of Clostridioides Difficile Infection in England

BACKGROUND: An economic model was developed with guidance from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) ‘Managing Common Infections’ (MCI) Committee to evaluate the cost effectiveness of different antibiotic treatment sequences for treating Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bromilow, Tom, Holmes, Hayden, Coote, Laura, Woods, Sam, Pink, Joshua
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10471526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37306930
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-023-00420-3
_version_ 1785099868234055680
author Bromilow, Tom
Holmes, Hayden
Coote, Laura
Woods, Sam
Pink, Joshua
author_facet Bromilow, Tom
Holmes, Hayden
Coote, Laura
Woods, Sam
Pink, Joshua
author_sort Bromilow, Tom
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: An economic model was developed with guidance from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) ‘Managing Common Infections’ (MCI) Committee to evaluate the cost effectiveness of different antibiotic treatment sequences for treating Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in England. METHODS: The model consisted of a 90-day decision tree followed by a lifetime cohort Markov model. Efficacy data were taken from a network meta-analysis and published literature, while cost, utility and mortality data were taken from published literature. A treatment sequence was defined as a first-line intervention or a different second-line intervention, and used constant third- and fourth-line interventions. The possible first- and second-line interventions were vancomycin, metronidazole, teicoplanin and fidaxomicin (standard and extended regimens). Total costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were calculated and were used to run a fully incremental cost-effectiveness analysis. Threshold analysis was conducted around pricing. RESULTS: Sequences including teicoplanin, fidaxomicin (extended regimen) and second-line metronidazole were excluded based on recommendations from the committee. The final pairwise comparison was between first-line vancomycin and second-line fidaxomicin (VAN-FID), and the reverse (FID-VAN). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for FID-VAN compared with VAN-FID was £156,000 per QALY gained, and FID-VAN had a 0.2% likelihood of being cost effective at a £20,000 threshold. CONCLUSION: First-line vancomycin and second-line fidaxomicin was the most cost-effective treatment sequence at the NICE threshold for treating CDI in England. The main limitation of this study was that the initial cure and recurrence rates of each intervention were applied constantly across each line of treatment and each round of recurrence. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41669-023-00420-3.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10471526
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104715262023-09-02 Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Antimicrobial Prescribing in the Treatment of Clostridioides Difficile Infection in England Bromilow, Tom Holmes, Hayden Coote, Laura Woods, Sam Pink, Joshua Pharmacoecon Open Original Research Article BACKGROUND: An economic model was developed with guidance from the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) ‘Managing Common Infections’ (MCI) Committee to evaluate the cost effectiveness of different antibiotic treatment sequences for treating Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in England. METHODS: The model consisted of a 90-day decision tree followed by a lifetime cohort Markov model. Efficacy data were taken from a network meta-analysis and published literature, while cost, utility and mortality data were taken from published literature. A treatment sequence was defined as a first-line intervention or a different second-line intervention, and used constant third- and fourth-line interventions. The possible first- and second-line interventions were vancomycin, metronidazole, teicoplanin and fidaxomicin (standard and extended regimens). Total costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were calculated and were used to run a fully incremental cost-effectiveness analysis. Threshold analysis was conducted around pricing. RESULTS: Sequences including teicoplanin, fidaxomicin (extended regimen) and second-line metronidazole were excluded based on recommendations from the committee. The final pairwise comparison was between first-line vancomycin and second-line fidaxomicin (VAN-FID), and the reverse (FID-VAN). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for FID-VAN compared with VAN-FID was £156,000 per QALY gained, and FID-VAN had a 0.2% likelihood of being cost effective at a £20,000 threshold. CONCLUSION: First-line vancomycin and second-line fidaxomicin was the most cost-effective treatment sequence at the NICE threshold for treating CDI in England. The main limitation of this study was that the initial cure and recurrence rates of each intervention were applied constantly across each line of treatment and each round of recurrence. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s41669-023-00420-3. Springer International Publishing 2023-06-12 /pmc/articles/PMC10471526/ /pubmed/37306930 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-023-00420-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023, corrected publication 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Bromilow, Tom
Holmes, Hayden
Coote, Laura
Woods, Sam
Pink, Joshua
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Antimicrobial Prescribing in the Treatment of Clostridioides Difficile Infection in England
title Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Antimicrobial Prescribing in the Treatment of Clostridioides Difficile Infection in England
title_full Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Antimicrobial Prescribing in the Treatment of Clostridioides Difficile Infection in England
title_fullStr Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Antimicrobial Prescribing in the Treatment of Clostridioides Difficile Infection in England
title_full_unstemmed Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Antimicrobial Prescribing in the Treatment of Clostridioides Difficile Infection in England
title_short Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Antimicrobial Prescribing in the Treatment of Clostridioides Difficile Infection in England
title_sort cost-effectiveness analysis of antimicrobial prescribing in the treatment of clostridioides difficile infection in england
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10471526/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37306930
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s41669-023-00420-3
work_keys_str_mv AT bromilowtom costeffectivenessanalysisofantimicrobialprescribinginthetreatmentofclostridioidesdifficileinfectioninengland
AT holmeshayden costeffectivenessanalysisofantimicrobialprescribinginthetreatmentofclostridioidesdifficileinfectioninengland
AT cootelaura costeffectivenessanalysisofantimicrobialprescribinginthetreatmentofclostridioidesdifficileinfectioninengland
AT woodssam costeffectivenessanalysisofantimicrobialprescribinginthetreatmentofclostridioidesdifficileinfectioninengland
AT pinkjoshua costeffectivenessanalysisofantimicrobialprescribinginthetreatmentofclostridioidesdifficileinfectioninengland