Cargando…
Artificial intelligence in ovarian cancer histopathology: a systematic review
This study evaluates the quality of published research using artificial intelligence (AI) for ovarian cancer diagnosis or prognosis using histopathology data. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL, and WHO-ICTRP was conducted up to May 19, 2023. Inclusion criteria r...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10471607/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37653025 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41698-023-00432-6 |
_version_ | 1785099887591817216 |
---|---|
author | Breen, Jack Allen, Katie Zucker, Kieran Adusumilli, Pratik Scarsbrook, Andrew Hall, Geoff Orsi, Nicolas M. Ravikumar, Nishant |
author_facet | Breen, Jack Allen, Katie Zucker, Kieran Adusumilli, Pratik Scarsbrook, Andrew Hall, Geoff Orsi, Nicolas M. Ravikumar, Nishant |
author_sort | Breen, Jack |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study evaluates the quality of published research using artificial intelligence (AI) for ovarian cancer diagnosis or prognosis using histopathology data. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL, and WHO-ICTRP was conducted up to May 19, 2023. Inclusion criteria required that AI was used for prognostic or diagnostic inferences in human ovarian cancer histopathology images. Risk of bias was assessed using PROBAST. Information about each model was tabulated and summary statistics were reported. The study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022334730) and PRISMA 2020 reporting guidelines were followed. Searches identified 1573 records, of which 45 were eligible for inclusion. These studies contained 80 models of interest, including 37 diagnostic models, 22 prognostic models, and 21 other diagnostically relevant models. Common tasks included treatment response prediction (11/80), malignancy status classification (10/80), stain quantification (9/80), and histological subtyping (7/80). Models were developed using 1–1375 histopathology slides from 1–776 ovarian cancer patients. A high or unclear risk of bias was found in all studies, most frequently due to limited analysis and incomplete reporting regarding participant recruitment. Limited research has been conducted on the application of AI to histopathology images for diagnostic or prognostic purposes in ovarian cancer, and none of the models have been demonstrated to be ready for real-world implementation. Key aspects to accelerate clinical translation include transparent and comprehensive reporting of data provenance and modelling approaches, and improved quantitative evaluation using cross-validation and external validations. This work was funded by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10471607 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104716072023-09-02 Artificial intelligence in ovarian cancer histopathology: a systematic review Breen, Jack Allen, Katie Zucker, Kieran Adusumilli, Pratik Scarsbrook, Andrew Hall, Geoff Orsi, Nicolas M. Ravikumar, Nishant NPJ Precis Oncol Review Article This study evaluates the quality of published research using artificial intelligence (AI) for ovarian cancer diagnosis or prognosis using histopathology data. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL, and WHO-ICTRP was conducted up to May 19, 2023. Inclusion criteria required that AI was used for prognostic or diagnostic inferences in human ovarian cancer histopathology images. Risk of bias was assessed using PROBAST. Information about each model was tabulated and summary statistics were reported. The study was registered on PROSPERO (CRD42022334730) and PRISMA 2020 reporting guidelines were followed. Searches identified 1573 records, of which 45 were eligible for inclusion. These studies contained 80 models of interest, including 37 diagnostic models, 22 prognostic models, and 21 other diagnostically relevant models. Common tasks included treatment response prediction (11/80), malignancy status classification (10/80), stain quantification (9/80), and histological subtyping (7/80). Models were developed using 1–1375 histopathology slides from 1–776 ovarian cancer patients. A high or unclear risk of bias was found in all studies, most frequently due to limited analysis and incomplete reporting regarding participant recruitment. Limited research has been conducted on the application of AI to histopathology images for diagnostic or prognostic purposes in ovarian cancer, and none of the models have been demonstrated to be ready for real-world implementation. Key aspects to accelerate clinical translation include transparent and comprehensive reporting of data provenance and modelling approaches, and improved quantitative evaluation using cross-validation and external validations. This work was funded by the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council. Nature Publishing Group UK 2023-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10471607/ /pubmed/37653025 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41698-023-00432-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Review Article Breen, Jack Allen, Katie Zucker, Kieran Adusumilli, Pratik Scarsbrook, Andrew Hall, Geoff Orsi, Nicolas M. Ravikumar, Nishant Artificial intelligence in ovarian cancer histopathology: a systematic review |
title | Artificial intelligence in ovarian cancer histopathology: a systematic review |
title_full | Artificial intelligence in ovarian cancer histopathology: a systematic review |
title_fullStr | Artificial intelligence in ovarian cancer histopathology: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | Artificial intelligence in ovarian cancer histopathology: a systematic review |
title_short | Artificial intelligence in ovarian cancer histopathology: a systematic review |
title_sort | artificial intelligence in ovarian cancer histopathology: a systematic review |
topic | Review Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10471607/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37653025 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41698-023-00432-6 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT breenjack artificialintelligenceinovariancancerhistopathologyasystematicreview AT allenkatie artificialintelligenceinovariancancerhistopathologyasystematicreview AT zuckerkieran artificialintelligenceinovariancancerhistopathologyasystematicreview AT adusumillipratik artificialintelligenceinovariancancerhistopathologyasystematicreview AT scarsbrookandrew artificialintelligenceinovariancancerhistopathologyasystematicreview AT hallgeoff artificialintelligenceinovariancancerhistopathologyasystematicreview AT orsinicolasm artificialintelligenceinovariancancerhistopathologyasystematicreview AT ravikumarnishant artificialintelligenceinovariancancerhistopathologyasystematicreview |