Cargando…

The role of a cryocompression device following total knee arthroplasty to assist in recovery: a randomised controlled trial

PURPOSE: The study sought to investigate the effectiveness of a cryocompression Game Ready™ (GR) versus usual care protocol (UC) on early post-operative recovery following total knee arthroplasty. METHODS: This study prospectively randomised 72 total knee arthroplasties to a 2-week (from day 0) inte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marinova, Mira, Sundaram, Abayasankar, Holtham, Katie, Ebert, Jay R., Wysocki, David, Meyerkort, Daniel, Radic, Ross
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10471706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37464101
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-023-07455-3
_version_ 1785099911605256192
author Marinova, Mira
Sundaram, Abayasankar
Holtham, Katie
Ebert, Jay R.
Wysocki, David
Meyerkort, Daniel
Radic, Ross
author_facet Marinova, Mira
Sundaram, Abayasankar
Holtham, Katie
Ebert, Jay R.
Wysocki, David
Meyerkort, Daniel
Radic, Ross
author_sort Marinova, Mira
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The study sought to investigate the effectiveness of a cryocompression Game Ready™ (GR) versus usual care protocol (UC) on early post-operative recovery following total knee arthroplasty. METHODS: This study prospectively randomised 72 total knee arthroplasties to a 2-week (from day 0) intervention of GR treatment (n = 36, 63.9% females) or UC of ice with static compression (n = 36, 45.7% females). Knee flexion and extension range of motion (ROM), a visual analogue pain scale and limb circumference were documented at day 1, 2 and 14, as well as 6 weeks post-surgery. Medication usage and length of hospital stay were documented. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) included the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and a Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire. Statistical analysis using linear mixed modelling and analysis of variance table with Satterthwaite's method were used along with two-tailed t-tests. RESULTS: There were no significant group-by-time interactions regarding any of the outcomes. The GR group had 19% lost to follow-up at 2 weeks, while the UC group had 8%. The GR group demonstrated significantly better knee extension ROM at day 1 (p = 0.048) and day 14 (p = 0.007) compared with the UC group. There were no group differences (n.s.) observed in pain, flexion ROM, limb circumference, opioid use or PROMs. Overall, higher pain levels resulted in increased opioid intake (p = 0.002), older patients used significantly less opioids (p < 0.001) and males reported significantly less pain than females (p = 0.048). No adverse effects were observed due to either protocol. CONCLUSION: Despite patients gaining significantly more knee extension during the initial two-week intervention period when using GR compared to UC, this effect was likely due to chance. No further significant differences were observed between the groups during or after cession of the intervention. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10471706
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104717062023-09-02 The role of a cryocompression device following total knee arthroplasty to assist in recovery: a randomised controlled trial Marinova, Mira Sundaram, Abayasankar Holtham, Katie Ebert, Jay R. Wysocki, David Meyerkort, Daniel Radic, Ross Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Knee PURPOSE: The study sought to investigate the effectiveness of a cryocompression Game Ready™ (GR) versus usual care protocol (UC) on early post-operative recovery following total knee arthroplasty. METHODS: This study prospectively randomised 72 total knee arthroplasties to a 2-week (from day 0) intervention of GR treatment (n = 36, 63.9% females) or UC of ice with static compression (n = 36, 45.7% females). Knee flexion and extension range of motion (ROM), a visual analogue pain scale and limb circumference were documented at day 1, 2 and 14, as well as 6 weeks post-surgery. Medication usage and length of hospital stay were documented. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) included the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and a Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire. Statistical analysis using linear mixed modelling and analysis of variance table with Satterthwaite's method were used along with two-tailed t-tests. RESULTS: There were no significant group-by-time interactions regarding any of the outcomes. The GR group had 19% lost to follow-up at 2 weeks, while the UC group had 8%. The GR group demonstrated significantly better knee extension ROM at day 1 (p = 0.048) and day 14 (p = 0.007) compared with the UC group. There were no group differences (n.s.) observed in pain, flexion ROM, limb circumference, opioid use or PROMs. Overall, higher pain levels resulted in increased opioid intake (p = 0.002), older patients used significantly less opioids (p < 0.001) and males reported significantly less pain than females (p = 0.048). No adverse effects were observed due to either protocol. CONCLUSION: Despite patients gaining significantly more knee extension during the initial two-week intervention period when using GR compared to UC, this effect was likely due to chance. No further significant differences were observed between the groups during or after cession of the intervention. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-07-18 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10471706/ /pubmed/37464101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-023-07455-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Knee
Marinova, Mira
Sundaram, Abayasankar
Holtham, Katie
Ebert, Jay R.
Wysocki, David
Meyerkort, Daniel
Radic, Ross
The role of a cryocompression device following total knee arthroplasty to assist in recovery: a randomised controlled trial
title The role of a cryocompression device following total knee arthroplasty to assist in recovery: a randomised controlled trial
title_full The role of a cryocompression device following total knee arthroplasty to assist in recovery: a randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr The role of a cryocompression device following total knee arthroplasty to assist in recovery: a randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed The role of a cryocompression device following total knee arthroplasty to assist in recovery: a randomised controlled trial
title_short The role of a cryocompression device following total knee arthroplasty to assist in recovery: a randomised controlled trial
title_sort role of a cryocompression device following total knee arthroplasty to assist in recovery: a randomised controlled trial
topic Knee
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10471706/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37464101
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-023-07455-3
work_keys_str_mv AT marinovamira theroleofacryocompressiondevicefollowingtotalkneearthroplastytoassistinrecoveryarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sundaramabayasankar theroleofacryocompressiondevicefollowingtotalkneearthroplastytoassistinrecoveryarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT holthamkatie theroleofacryocompressiondevicefollowingtotalkneearthroplastytoassistinrecoveryarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT ebertjayr theroleofacryocompressiondevicefollowingtotalkneearthroplastytoassistinrecoveryarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT wysockidavid theroleofacryocompressiondevicefollowingtotalkneearthroplastytoassistinrecoveryarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT meyerkortdaniel theroleofacryocompressiondevicefollowingtotalkneearthroplastytoassistinrecoveryarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT radicross theroleofacryocompressiondevicefollowingtotalkneearthroplastytoassistinrecoveryarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT marinovamira roleofacryocompressiondevicefollowingtotalkneearthroplastytoassistinrecoveryarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT sundaramabayasankar roleofacryocompressiondevicefollowingtotalkneearthroplastytoassistinrecoveryarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT holthamkatie roleofacryocompressiondevicefollowingtotalkneearthroplastytoassistinrecoveryarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT ebertjayr roleofacryocompressiondevicefollowingtotalkneearthroplastytoassistinrecoveryarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT wysockidavid roleofacryocompressiondevicefollowingtotalkneearthroplastytoassistinrecoveryarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT meyerkortdaniel roleofacryocompressiondevicefollowingtotalkneearthroplastytoassistinrecoveryarandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT radicross roleofacryocompressiondevicefollowingtotalkneearthroplastytoassistinrecoveryarandomisedcontrolledtrial