Cargando…
The role of a cryocompression device following total knee arthroplasty to assist in recovery: a randomised controlled trial
PURPOSE: The study sought to investigate the effectiveness of a cryocompression Game Ready™ (GR) versus usual care protocol (UC) on early post-operative recovery following total knee arthroplasty. METHODS: This study prospectively randomised 72 total knee arthroplasties to a 2-week (from day 0) inte...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10471706/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37464101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-023-07455-3 |
_version_ | 1785099911605256192 |
---|---|
author | Marinova, Mira Sundaram, Abayasankar Holtham, Katie Ebert, Jay R. Wysocki, David Meyerkort, Daniel Radic, Ross |
author_facet | Marinova, Mira Sundaram, Abayasankar Holtham, Katie Ebert, Jay R. Wysocki, David Meyerkort, Daniel Radic, Ross |
author_sort | Marinova, Mira |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The study sought to investigate the effectiveness of a cryocompression Game Ready™ (GR) versus usual care protocol (UC) on early post-operative recovery following total knee arthroplasty. METHODS: This study prospectively randomised 72 total knee arthroplasties to a 2-week (from day 0) intervention of GR treatment (n = 36, 63.9% females) or UC of ice with static compression (n = 36, 45.7% females). Knee flexion and extension range of motion (ROM), a visual analogue pain scale and limb circumference were documented at day 1, 2 and 14, as well as 6 weeks post-surgery. Medication usage and length of hospital stay were documented. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) included the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and a Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire. Statistical analysis using linear mixed modelling and analysis of variance table with Satterthwaite's method were used along with two-tailed t-tests. RESULTS: There were no significant group-by-time interactions regarding any of the outcomes. The GR group had 19% lost to follow-up at 2 weeks, while the UC group had 8%. The GR group demonstrated significantly better knee extension ROM at day 1 (p = 0.048) and day 14 (p = 0.007) compared with the UC group. There were no group differences (n.s.) observed in pain, flexion ROM, limb circumference, opioid use or PROMs. Overall, higher pain levels resulted in increased opioid intake (p = 0.002), older patients used significantly less opioids (p < 0.001) and males reported significantly less pain than females (p = 0.048). No adverse effects were observed due to either protocol. CONCLUSION: Despite patients gaining significantly more knee extension during the initial two-week intervention period when using GR compared to UC, this effect was likely due to chance. No further significant differences were observed between the groups during or after cession of the intervention. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10471706 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104717062023-09-02 The role of a cryocompression device following total knee arthroplasty to assist in recovery: a randomised controlled trial Marinova, Mira Sundaram, Abayasankar Holtham, Katie Ebert, Jay R. Wysocki, David Meyerkort, Daniel Radic, Ross Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc Knee PURPOSE: The study sought to investigate the effectiveness of a cryocompression Game Ready™ (GR) versus usual care protocol (UC) on early post-operative recovery following total knee arthroplasty. METHODS: This study prospectively randomised 72 total knee arthroplasties to a 2-week (from day 0) intervention of GR treatment (n = 36, 63.9% females) or UC of ice with static compression (n = 36, 45.7% females). Knee flexion and extension range of motion (ROM), a visual analogue pain scale and limb circumference were documented at day 1, 2 and 14, as well as 6 weeks post-surgery. Medication usage and length of hospital stay were documented. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) included the Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and a Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire. Statistical analysis using linear mixed modelling and analysis of variance table with Satterthwaite's method were used along with two-tailed t-tests. RESULTS: There were no significant group-by-time interactions regarding any of the outcomes. The GR group had 19% lost to follow-up at 2 weeks, while the UC group had 8%. The GR group demonstrated significantly better knee extension ROM at day 1 (p = 0.048) and day 14 (p = 0.007) compared with the UC group. There were no group differences (n.s.) observed in pain, flexion ROM, limb circumference, opioid use or PROMs. Overall, higher pain levels resulted in increased opioid intake (p = 0.002), older patients used significantly less opioids (p < 0.001) and males reported significantly less pain than females (p = 0.048). No adverse effects were observed due to either protocol. CONCLUSION: Despite patients gaining significantly more knee extension during the initial two-week intervention period when using GR compared to UC, this effect was likely due to chance. No further significant differences were observed between the groups during or after cession of the intervention. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level 2. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2023-07-18 2023 /pmc/articles/PMC10471706/ /pubmed/37464101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-023-07455-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Knee Marinova, Mira Sundaram, Abayasankar Holtham, Katie Ebert, Jay R. Wysocki, David Meyerkort, Daniel Radic, Ross The role of a cryocompression device following total knee arthroplasty to assist in recovery: a randomised controlled trial |
title | The role of a cryocompression device following total knee arthroplasty to assist in recovery: a randomised controlled trial |
title_full | The role of a cryocompression device following total knee arthroplasty to assist in recovery: a randomised controlled trial |
title_fullStr | The role of a cryocompression device following total knee arthroplasty to assist in recovery: a randomised controlled trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The role of a cryocompression device following total knee arthroplasty to assist in recovery: a randomised controlled trial |
title_short | The role of a cryocompression device following total knee arthroplasty to assist in recovery: a randomised controlled trial |
title_sort | role of a cryocompression device following total knee arthroplasty to assist in recovery: a randomised controlled trial |
topic | Knee |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10471706/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37464101 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00167-023-07455-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT marinovamira theroleofacryocompressiondevicefollowingtotalkneearthroplastytoassistinrecoveryarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT sundaramabayasankar theroleofacryocompressiondevicefollowingtotalkneearthroplastytoassistinrecoveryarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT holthamkatie theroleofacryocompressiondevicefollowingtotalkneearthroplastytoassistinrecoveryarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT ebertjayr theroleofacryocompressiondevicefollowingtotalkneearthroplastytoassistinrecoveryarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT wysockidavid theroleofacryocompressiondevicefollowingtotalkneearthroplastytoassistinrecoveryarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT meyerkortdaniel theroleofacryocompressiondevicefollowingtotalkneearthroplastytoassistinrecoveryarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT radicross theroleofacryocompressiondevicefollowingtotalkneearthroplastytoassistinrecoveryarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT marinovamira roleofacryocompressiondevicefollowingtotalkneearthroplastytoassistinrecoveryarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT sundaramabayasankar roleofacryocompressiondevicefollowingtotalkneearthroplastytoassistinrecoveryarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT holthamkatie roleofacryocompressiondevicefollowingtotalkneearthroplastytoassistinrecoveryarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT ebertjayr roleofacryocompressiondevicefollowingtotalkneearthroplastytoassistinrecoveryarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT wysockidavid roleofacryocompressiondevicefollowingtotalkneearthroplastytoassistinrecoveryarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT meyerkortdaniel roleofacryocompressiondevicefollowingtotalkneearthroplastytoassistinrecoveryarandomisedcontrolledtrial AT radicross roleofacryocompressiondevicefollowingtotalkneearthroplastytoassistinrecoveryarandomisedcontrolledtrial |