Cargando…
Expansion of non-invasive prenatal screening to the screening of 10 types of chromosomal anomalies: a cost-effectiveness analysis
OBJECTIVES: To determine the cost-effectiveness of the addition of chromosomal anomalies detectable by non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS), in a prenatal screening programme targeting common aneuploidies. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A simulation study was conducted to study the addition of...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10471875/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37648381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069485 |
_version_ | 1785099948204752896 |
---|---|
author | Soukkhaphone, Bounhome Baradaran, Mohammad Nguyen, Ba Diep Nshimyumukiza, Leon Little, Julian Rousseau, Francois Audibert, Francois Langlois, Sylvie Reinharz, Daniel |
author_facet | Soukkhaphone, Bounhome Baradaran, Mohammad Nguyen, Ba Diep Nshimyumukiza, Leon Little, Julian Rousseau, Francois Audibert, Francois Langlois, Sylvie Reinharz, Daniel |
author_sort | Soukkhaphone, Bounhome |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: To determine the cost-effectiveness of the addition of chromosomal anomalies detectable by non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS), in a prenatal screening programme targeting common aneuploidies. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A simulation study was conducted to study the addition of chromosomal anomalies detectable by NIPS (sex chromosome aneuploidies, 22q11.2 deletion syndrome, large deletion/duplication >7 Mb and rare autosomal trisomies) to five basic strategies currently aiming the common trisomies: three strategies currently offered by the public healthcare systems in Canada, whose first-tier test is performed with biochemical markers, and two programmes whose first-tier test consists of NIPS-based methods. OUTCOME MEASURES: The total number of cases of chromosomal anomalies detected and the costs related to the consumption of medical services. RESULTS: The most effective and the most cost-effective option in almost all prenatal screening strategies is the option that includes all targeted additional conditions. In the strategies where NIPS is used as first-tier testing, the cost per additional case detected by adding all possible additional anomalies to a programme that currently targets only common trisomies is $C25 710 (95% CI $C25 489 to $C25 934) for massively parallel shotgun sequencing and $C57 711 (95% CI $C57 141 to $C58 292) for targeted massively parallel sequencing, respectively. The acceptability curves show that at a willingness-to-pay of $C50 000 per one additional case detected, the expansion of NIPS-based methods for the detection of all possible additional conditions has a 90% probability of being cost-effective. CONCLUSION: From an economic perspective, in strategies that use NIPS as a first-tier screening test, expanding the programmes to detect any considered chromosomal anomalies other than the three common trisomies would be cost-effective. However, the potential expansion of prenatal screening programmes also requires consideration of societal issues, including ethical ones. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10471875 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104718752023-09-02 Expansion of non-invasive prenatal screening to the screening of 10 types of chromosomal anomalies: a cost-effectiveness analysis Soukkhaphone, Bounhome Baradaran, Mohammad Nguyen, Ba Diep Nshimyumukiza, Leon Little, Julian Rousseau, Francois Audibert, Francois Langlois, Sylvie Reinharz, Daniel BMJ Open Health Economics OBJECTIVES: To determine the cost-effectiveness of the addition of chromosomal anomalies detectable by non-invasive prenatal screening (NIPS), in a prenatal screening programme targeting common aneuploidies. DESIGN, SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: A simulation study was conducted to study the addition of chromosomal anomalies detectable by NIPS (sex chromosome aneuploidies, 22q11.2 deletion syndrome, large deletion/duplication >7 Mb and rare autosomal trisomies) to five basic strategies currently aiming the common trisomies: three strategies currently offered by the public healthcare systems in Canada, whose first-tier test is performed with biochemical markers, and two programmes whose first-tier test consists of NIPS-based methods. OUTCOME MEASURES: The total number of cases of chromosomal anomalies detected and the costs related to the consumption of medical services. RESULTS: The most effective and the most cost-effective option in almost all prenatal screening strategies is the option that includes all targeted additional conditions. In the strategies where NIPS is used as first-tier testing, the cost per additional case detected by adding all possible additional anomalies to a programme that currently targets only common trisomies is $C25 710 (95% CI $C25 489 to $C25 934) for massively parallel shotgun sequencing and $C57 711 (95% CI $C57 141 to $C58 292) for targeted massively parallel sequencing, respectively. The acceptability curves show that at a willingness-to-pay of $C50 000 per one additional case detected, the expansion of NIPS-based methods for the detection of all possible additional conditions has a 90% probability of being cost-effective. CONCLUSION: From an economic perspective, in strategies that use NIPS as a first-tier screening test, expanding the programmes to detect any considered chromosomal anomalies other than the three common trisomies would be cost-effective. However, the potential expansion of prenatal screening programmes also requires consideration of societal issues, including ethical ones. BMJ Publishing Group 2023-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC10471875/ /pubmed/37648381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069485 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Health Economics Soukkhaphone, Bounhome Baradaran, Mohammad Nguyen, Ba Diep Nshimyumukiza, Leon Little, Julian Rousseau, Francois Audibert, Francois Langlois, Sylvie Reinharz, Daniel Expansion of non-invasive prenatal screening to the screening of 10 types of chromosomal anomalies: a cost-effectiveness analysis |
title | Expansion of non-invasive prenatal screening to the screening of 10 types of chromosomal anomalies: a cost-effectiveness analysis |
title_full | Expansion of non-invasive prenatal screening to the screening of 10 types of chromosomal anomalies: a cost-effectiveness analysis |
title_fullStr | Expansion of non-invasive prenatal screening to the screening of 10 types of chromosomal anomalies: a cost-effectiveness analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Expansion of non-invasive prenatal screening to the screening of 10 types of chromosomal anomalies: a cost-effectiveness analysis |
title_short | Expansion of non-invasive prenatal screening to the screening of 10 types of chromosomal anomalies: a cost-effectiveness analysis |
title_sort | expansion of non-invasive prenatal screening to the screening of 10 types of chromosomal anomalies: a cost-effectiveness analysis |
topic | Health Economics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10471875/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37648381 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-069485 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT soukkhaphonebounhome expansionofnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningtothescreeningof10typesofchromosomalanomaliesacosteffectivenessanalysis AT baradaranmohammad expansionofnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningtothescreeningof10typesofchromosomalanomaliesacosteffectivenessanalysis AT nguyenbadiep expansionofnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningtothescreeningof10typesofchromosomalanomaliesacosteffectivenessanalysis AT nshimyumukizaleon expansionofnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningtothescreeningof10typesofchromosomalanomaliesacosteffectivenessanalysis AT littlejulian expansionofnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningtothescreeningof10typesofchromosomalanomaliesacosteffectivenessanalysis AT rousseaufrancois expansionofnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningtothescreeningof10typesofchromosomalanomaliesacosteffectivenessanalysis AT audibertfrancois expansionofnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningtothescreeningof10typesofchromosomalanomaliesacosteffectivenessanalysis AT langloissylvie expansionofnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningtothescreeningof10typesofchromosomalanomaliesacosteffectivenessanalysis AT reinharzdaniel expansionofnoninvasiveprenatalscreeningtothescreeningof10typesofchromosomalanomaliesacosteffectivenessanalysis |