Cargando…

S-Protected Thiolated Chitosan versus Thiolated Chitosan as Cell Adhesive Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering

[Image: see text] Chitosan (Ch) and different Ch derivatives have been applied in tissue engineering (TE) because of their biocompatibility, favored mechanical properties, and cost-effectiveness. Most of them, however, lack cell adhesive properties that are crucial for TE. In this study, we aimed to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Le-Vinh, Bao, Steinbring, Christian, Nguyen Le, Nguyet-Minh, Matuszczak, Barbara, Bernkop-Schnürch, Andreas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2023
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10472333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37594415
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c09337
_version_ 1785100053445083136
author Le-Vinh, Bao
Steinbring, Christian
Nguyen Le, Nguyet-Minh
Matuszczak, Barbara
Bernkop-Schnürch, Andreas
author_facet Le-Vinh, Bao
Steinbring, Christian
Nguyen Le, Nguyet-Minh
Matuszczak, Barbara
Bernkop-Schnürch, Andreas
author_sort Le-Vinh, Bao
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] Chitosan (Ch) and different Ch derivatives have been applied in tissue engineering (TE) because of their biocompatibility, favored mechanical properties, and cost-effectiveness. Most of them, however, lack cell adhesive properties that are crucial for TE. In this study, we aimed to design an S-protected thiolated Ch derivative exhibiting high cell adhesive properties serving as a scaffold for TE. 3-((2-Acetamido-3-methoxy-3-oxopropyl)dithio) propanoic acid was covalently attached to Ch via a carbodiimide-mediated reaction. Low-, medium-, and high-modified Chs (Ch-SS-1, Ch-SS-2, and Ch-SS-3) with 54, 107 and 140 μmol of ligand per gram of polymer, respectively, were tested. In parallel, three thiolated Chs, namely Ch-SH-1, Ch-SH-2, and Ch-SH-3, were prepared by conjugating N-acetyl cysteine to Ch at the same degree of modification to compare the effectiveness of disulfide versus thiol modification on cell adhesion. Ch-SS-1 showed better cell adhesion capability than Ch-SS-2 and Ch-SS-3. This can be explained by the more lipophilic surfaces of Ch-SS as a higher modification was made. Although Ch-SH-1, Ch-SH-2, and Ch-SH-3 were shown to be good substrates for cell adhesion, growth, and proliferation, Ch-SS polymers were superior to Ch-SH polymers in the formation of 3D cell cultures. Cryogels structured by Ch-SS-1 (SSg) resulted in homogeneous scaffolds with tunable pore size and mechanical properties by changing the mass ratio between Ch-SS-1 and heparin used as a cross-linker. SSg scaffolds possessing interconnected microporous structures showed good cell migration, adhesion, and proliferation. Therefore, Ch-SS can be used to construct tunable cryogel scaffolds that are suitable for 3D cell culture and TE.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10472333
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104723332023-09-02 S-Protected Thiolated Chitosan versus Thiolated Chitosan as Cell Adhesive Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering Le-Vinh, Bao Steinbring, Christian Nguyen Le, Nguyet-Minh Matuszczak, Barbara Bernkop-Schnürch, Andreas ACS Appl Mater Interfaces [Image: see text] Chitosan (Ch) and different Ch derivatives have been applied in tissue engineering (TE) because of their biocompatibility, favored mechanical properties, and cost-effectiveness. Most of them, however, lack cell adhesive properties that are crucial for TE. In this study, we aimed to design an S-protected thiolated Ch derivative exhibiting high cell adhesive properties serving as a scaffold for TE. 3-((2-Acetamido-3-methoxy-3-oxopropyl)dithio) propanoic acid was covalently attached to Ch via a carbodiimide-mediated reaction. Low-, medium-, and high-modified Chs (Ch-SS-1, Ch-SS-2, and Ch-SS-3) with 54, 107 and 140 μmol of ligand per gram of polymer, respectively, were tested. In parallel, three thiolated Chs, namely Ch-SH-1, Ch-SH-2, and Ch-SH-3, were prepared by conjugating N-acetyl cysteine to Ch at the same degree of modification to compare the effectiveness of disulfide versus thiol modification on cell adhesion. Ch-SS-1 showed better cell adhesion capability than Ch-SS-2 and Ch-SS-3. This can be explained by the more lipophilic surfaces of Ch-SS as a higher modification was made. Although Ch-SH-1, Ch-SH-2, and Ch-SH-3 were shown to be good substrates for cell adhesion, growth, and proliferation, Ch-SS polymers were superior to Ch-SH polymers in the formation of 3D cell cultures. Cryogels structured by Ch-SS-1 (SSg) resulted in homogeneous scaffolds with tunable pore size and mechanical properties by changing the mass ratio between Ch-SS-1 and heparin used as a cross-linker. SSg scaffolds possessing interconnected microporous structures showed good cell migration, adhesion, and proliferation. Therefore, Ch-SS can be used to construct tunable cryogel scaffolds that are suitable for 3D cell culture and TE. American Chemical Society 2023-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10472333/ /pubmed/37594415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c09337 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Le-Vinh, Bao
Steinbring, Christian
Nguyen Le, Nguyet-Minh
Matuszczak, Barbara
Bernkop-Schnürch, Andreas
S-Protected Thiolated Chitosan versus Thiolated Chitosan as Cell Adhesive Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering
title S-Protected Thiolated Chitosan versus Thiolated Chitosan as Cell Adhesive Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering
title_full S-Protected Thiolated Chitosan versus Thiolated Chitosan as Cell Adhesive Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering
title_fullStr S-Protected Thiolated Chitosan versus Thiolated Chitosan as Cell Adhesive Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering
title_full_unstemmed S-Protected Thiolated Chitosan versus Thiolated Chitosan as Cell Adhesive Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering
title_short S-Protected Thiolated Chitosan versus Thiolated Chitosan as Cell Adhesive Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering
title_sort s-protected thiolated chitosan versus thiolated chitosan as cell adhesive biomaterials for tissue engineering
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10472333/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37594415
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c09337
work_keys_str_mv AT levinhbao sprotectedthiolatedchitosanversusthiolatedchitosanascelladhesivebiomaterialsfortissueengineering
AT steinbringchristian sprotectedthiolatedchitosanversusthiolatedchitosanascelladhesivebiomaterialsfortissueengineering
AT nguyenlenguyetminh sprotectedthiolatedchitosanversusthiolatedchitosanascelladhesivebiomaterialsfortissueengineering
AT matuszczakbarbara sprotectedthiolatedchitosanversusthiolatedchitosanascelladhesivebiomaterialsfortissueengineering
AT bernkopschnurchandreas sprotectedthiolatedchitosanversusthiolatedchitosanascelladhesivebiomaterialsfortissueengineering