Cargando…
S-Protected Thiolated Chitosan versus Thiolated Chitosan as Cell Adhesive Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering
[Image: see text] Chitosan (Ch) and different Ch derivatives have been applied in tissue engineering (TE) because of their biocompatibility, favored mechanical properties, and cost-effectiveness. Most of them, however, lack cell adhesive properties that are crucial for TE. In this study, we aimed to...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2023
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10472333/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37594415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c09337 |
_version_ | 1785100053445083136 |
---|---|
author | Le-Vinh, Bao Steinbring, Christian Nguyen Le, Nguyet-Minh Matuszczak, Barbara Bernkop-Schnürch, Andreas |
author_facet | Le-Vinh, Bao Steinbring, Christian Nguyen Le, Nguyet-Minh Matuszczak, Barbara Bernkop-Schnürch, Andreas |
author_sort | Le-Vinh, Bao |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] Chitosan (Ch) and different Ch derivatives have been applied in tissue engineering (TE) because of their biocompatibility, favored mechanical properties, and cost-effectiveness. Most of them, however, lack cell adhesive properties that are crucial for TE. In this study, we aimed to design an S-protected thiolated Ch derivative exhibiting high cell adhesive properties serving as a scaffold for TE. 3-((2-Acetamido-3-methoxy-3-oxopropyl)dithio) propanoic acid was covalently attached to Ch via a carbodiimide-mediated reaction. Low-, medium-, and high-modified Chs (Ch-SS-1, Ch-SS-2, and Ch-SS-3) with 54, 107 and 140 μmol of ligand per gram of polymer, respectively, were tested. In parallel, three thiolated Chs, namely Ch-SH-1, Ch-SH-2, and Ch-SH-3, were prepared by conjugating N-acetyl cysteine to Ch at the same degree of modification to compare the effectiveness of disulfide versus thiol modification on cell adhesion. Ch-SS-1 showed better cell adhesion capability than Ch-SS-2 and Ch-SS-3. This can be explained by the more lipophilic surfaces of Ch-SS as a higher modification was made. Although Ch-SH-1, Ch-SH-2, and Ch-SH-3 were shown to be good substrates for cell adhesion, growth, and proliferation, Ch-SS polymers were superior to Ch-SH polymers in the formation of 3D cell cultures. Cryogels structured by Ch-SS-1 (SSg) resulted in homogeneous scaffolds with tunable pore size and mechanical properties by changing the mass ratio between Ch-SS-1 and heparin used as a cross-linker. SSg scaffolds possessing interconnected microporous structures showed good cell migration, adhesion, and proliferation. Therefore, Ch-SS can be used to construct tunable cryogel scaffolds that are suitable for 3D cell culture and TE. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10472333 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104723332023-09-02 S-Protected Thiolated Chitosan versus Thiolated Chitosan as Cell Adhesive Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering Le-Vinh, Bao Steinbring, Christian Nguyen Le, Nguyet-Minh Matuszczak, Barbara Bernkop-Schnürch, Andreas ACS Appl Mater Interfaces [Image: see text] Chitosan (Ch) and different Ch derivatives have been applied in tissue engineering (TE) because of their biocompatibility, favored mechanical properties, and cost-effectiveness. Most of them, however, lack cell adhesive properties that are crucial for TE. In this study, we aimed to design an S-protected thiolated Ch derivative exhibiting high cell adhesive properties serving as a scaffold for TE. 3-((2-Acetamido-3-methoxy-3-oxopropyl)dithio) propanoic acid was covalently attached to Ch via a carbodiimide-mediated reaction. Low-, medium-, and high-modified Chs (Ch-SS-1, Ch-SS-2, and Ch-SS-3) with 54, 107 and 140 μmol of ligand per gram of polymer, respectively, were tested. In parallel, three thiolated Chs, namely Ch-SH-1, Ch-SH-2, and Ch-SH-3, were prepared by conjugating N-acetyl cysteine to Ch at the same degree of modification to compare the effectiveness of disulfide versus thiol modification on cell adhesion. Ch-SS-1 showed better cell adhesion capability than Ch-SS-2 and Ch-SS-3. This can be explained by the more lipophilic surfaces of Ch-SS as a higher modification was made. Although Ch-SH-1, Ch-SH-2, and Ch-SH-3 were shown to be good substrates for cell adhesion, growth, and proliferation, Ch-SS polymers were superior to Ch-SH polymers in the formation of 3D cell cultures. Cryogels structured by Ch-SS-1 (SSg) resulted in homogeneous scaffolds with tunable pore size and mechanical properties by changing the mass ratio between Ch-SS-1 and heparin used as a cross-linker. SSg scaffolds possessing interconnected microporous structures showed good cell migration, adhesion, and proliferation. Therefore, Ch-SS can be used to construct tunable cryogel scaffolds that are suitable for 3D cell culture and TE. American Chemical Society 2023-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10472333/ /pubmed/37594415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c09337 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Permits the broadest form of re-use including for commercial purposes, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Le-Vinh, Bao Steinbring, Christian Nguyen Le, Nguyet-Minh Matuszczak, Barbara Bernkop-Schnürch, Andreas S-Protected Thiolated Chitosan versus Thiolated Chitosan as Cell Adhesive Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering |
title | S-Protected
Thiolated Chitosan versus Thiolated
Chitosan as Cell Adhesive Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering |
title_full | S-Protected
Thiolated Chitosan versus Thiolated
Chitosan as Cell Adhesive Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering |
title_fullStr | S-Protected
Thiolated Chitosan versus Thiolated
Chitosan as Cell Adhesive Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering |
title_full_unstemmed | S-Protected
Thiolated Chitosan versus Thiolated
Chitosan as Cell Adhesive Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering |
title_short | S-Protected
Thiolated Chitosan versus Thiolated
Chitosan as Cell Adhesive Biomaterials for Tissue Engineering |
title_sort | s-protected
thiolated chitosan versus thiolated
chitosan as cell adhesive biomaterials for tissue engineering |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10472333/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37594415 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsami.3c09337 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT levinhbao sprotectedthiolatedchitosanversusthiolatedchitosanascelladhesivebiomaterialsfortissueengineering AT steinbringchristian sprotectedthiolatedchitosanversusthiolatedchitosanascelladhesivebiomaterialsfortissueengineering AT nguyenlenguyetminh sprotectedthiolatedchitosanversusthiolatedchitosanascelladhesivebiomaterialsfortissueengineering AT matuszczakbarbara sprotectedthiolatedchitosanversusthiolatedchitosanascelladhesivebiomaterialsfortissueengineering AT bernkopschnurchandreas sprotectedthiolatedchitosanversusthiolatedchitosanascelladhesivebiomaterialsfortissueengineering |