Cargando…

The Effect of Rapid Point-of-Care Respiratory Pathogen Testing on Antibiotic Prescriptions in Acute Infections—A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

BACKGROUND: Rapid point-of-care testing for respiratory pathogens has gained increasing popularity, but its impact on antibiotic consumption is unclear. Thus, the aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to estimate the effect of rapid point-of-care testing on antibiotic prescriptions. ME...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kuitunen, Ilari, Renko, Marjo
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10472488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37662450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad443
_version_ 1785100086022242304
author Kuitunen, Ilari
Renko, Marjo
author_facet Kuitunen, Ilari
Renko, Marjo
author_sort Kuitunen, Ilari
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Rapid point-of-care testing for respiratory pathogens has gained increasing popularity, but its impact on antibiotic consumption is unclear. Thus, the aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to estimate the effect of rapid point-of-care testing on antibiotic prescriptions. METHODS: The search for this systematic review with meta-analysis was performed in February 2023. Randomized controlled trials investigating the impact of testing for respiratory pathogens in all-aged patients were included regardless of the comparator. The main outcome was the antibiotic prescription rate. Analyses were stratified by test type, test setting, and patient age. A random-effects Mantel-Haenszel model was used to calculate risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Risk of bias was assessed for included studies, and the quality of the evidence was rated according to GRADE. RESULTS: A total of 754 abstracts were screened, and 10 studies were included in the analysis. Risk of bias was high in 2, low in 4, and had some concerns in 4 studies. Four studies analyzed influenza and respiratory syncytial virus tests, and 6 studies analyzed multiplex (viral and/or bacterial) testing. The prescription rate was 48.2% (496/1029) in the influenza and respiratory syncytial virus test group and 48.7% (540/1109) in the control group (risk ratio [RR], 0.97; 95% CI, 0.92–1.02; moderate-quality evidence). The prescription rate in the multiplex testing group was 54.3% (1554/2859), and it was 57.3% (1336/2326) in the control group (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.96–1.04; moderate-quality evidence). In an age-stratified analysis, the prescription rates showed no evidence of a difference (children: RR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.81–1.30; adults: RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96–1.01; very low- and moderate-quality evidence). CONCLUSIONS: We found moderate-quality evidence that rapid point-of-care testing for respiratory pathogens does not decrease the antibiotic prescription rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10472488
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104724882023-09-02 The Effect of Rapid Point-of-Care Respiratory Pathogen Testing on Antibiotic Prescriptions in Acute Infections—A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials Kuitunen, Ilari Renko, Marjo Open Forum Infect Dis Review Article BACKGROUND: Rapid point-of-care testing for respiratory pathogens has gained increasing popularity, but its impact on antibiotic consumption is unclear. Thus, the aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to estimate the effect of rapid point-of-care testing on antibiotic prescriptions. METHODS: The search for this systematic review with meta-analysis was performed in February 2023. Randomized controlled trials investigating the impact of testing for respiratory pathogens in all-aged patients were included regardless of the comparator. The main outcome was the antibiotic prescription rate. Analyses were stratified by test type, test setting, and patient age. A random-effects Mantel-Haenszel model was used to calculate risk ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Risk of bias was assessed for included studies, and the quality of the evidence was rated according to GRADE. RESULTS: A total of 754 abstracts were screened, and 10 studies were included in the analysis. Risk of bias was high in 2, low in 4, and had some concerns in 4 studies. Four studies analyzed influenza and respiratory syncytial virus tests, and 6 studies analyzed multiplex (viral and/or bacterial) testing. The prescription rate was 48.2% (496/1029) in the influenza and respiratory syncytial virus test group and 48.7% (540/1109) in the control group (risk ratio [RR], 0.97; 95% CI, 0.92–1.02; moderate-quality evidence). The prescription rate in the multiplex testing group was 54.3% (1554/2859), and it was 57.3% (1336/2326) in the control group (RR, 1.00; 95% CI, 0.96–1.04; moderate-quality evidence). In an age-stratified analysis, the prescription rates showed no evidence of a difference (children: RR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.81–1.30; adults: RR, 0.98; 95% CI, 0.96–1.01; very low- and moderate-quality evidence). CONCLUSIONS: We found moderate-quality evidence that rapid point-of-care testing for respiratory pathogens does not decrease the antibiotic prescription rate. Oxford University Press 2023-08-18 /pmc/articles/PMC10472488/ /pubmed/37662450 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad443 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Kuitunen, Ilari
Renko, Marjo
The Effect of Rapid Point-of-Care Respiratory Pathogen Testing on Antibiotic Prescriptions in Acute Infections—A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title The Effect of Rapid Point-of-Care Respiratory Pathogen Testing on Antibiotic Prescriptions in Acute Infections—A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full The Effect of Rapid Point-of-Care Respiratory Pathogen Testing on Antibiotic Prescriptions in Acute Infections—A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_fullStr The Effect of Rapid Point-of-Care Respiratory Pathogen Testing on Antibiotic Prescriptions in Acute Infections—A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_full_unstemmed The Effect of Rapid Point-of-Care Respiratory Pathogen Testing on Antibiotic Prescriptions in Acute Infections—A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_short The Effect of Rapid Point-of-Care Respiratory Pathogen Testing on Antibiotic Prescriptions in Acute Infections—A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
title_sort effect of rapid point-of-care respiratory pathogen testing on antibiotic prescriptions in acute infections—a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10472488/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37662450
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofad443
work_keys_str_mv AT kuitunenilari theeffectofrapidpointofcarerespiratorypathogentestingonantibioticprescriptionsinacuteinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT renkomarjo theeffectofrapidpointofcarerespiratorypathogentestingonantibioticprescriptionsinacuteinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT kuitunenilari effectofrapidpointofcarerespiratorypathogentestingonantibioticprescriptionsinacuteinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials
AT renkomarjo effectofrapidpointofcarerespiratorypathogentestingonantibioticprescriptionsinacuteinfectionsasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofrandomizedcontrolledtrials