Cargando…
A global pause generates nonselective response inhibition during selective stopping
Selective response inhibition may be required when stopping a part of a multicomponent action. A persistent response delay (stopping-interference effect) indicates nonselective response inhibition during selective stopping. This study aimed to elucidate whether nonselective response inhibition is th...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10472494/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37395336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhad239 |
_version_ | 1785100087202938880 |
---|---|
author | Wadsley, Corey G Cirillo, John Nieuwenhuys, Arne Byblow, Winston D |
author_facet | Wadsley, Corey G Cirillo, John Nieuwenhuys, Arne Byblow, Winston D |
author_sort | Wadsley, Corey G |
collection | PubMed |
description | Selective response inhibition may be required when stopping a part of a multicomponent action. A persistent response delay (stopping-interference effect) indicates nonselective response inhibition during selective stopping. This study aimed to elucidate whether nonselective response inhibition is the consequence of a global pause process during attentional capture or specific to a nonselective cancel process during selective stopping. Twenty healthy human participants performed a bimanual anticipatory response inhibition paradigm with selective stop and ignore signals. Frontocentral and sensorimotor beta-bursts were recorded with electroencephalography. Corticomotor excitability and short-interval intracortical inhibition in primary motor cortex were recorded with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Behaviorally, responses in the non-signaled hand were delayed during selective ignore and stop trials. The response delay was largest during selective stop trials and indicated that stopping-interference could not be attributed entirely to attentional capture. A stimulus-nonselective increase in frontocentral beta-bursts occurred during stop and ignore trials. Sensorimotor response inhibition was reflected in maintenance of beta-bursts and short-interval intracortical inhibition relative to disinhibition observed during go trials. Response inhibition signatures were not associated with the magnitude of stopping-interference. Therefore, nonselective response inhibition during selective stopping results primarily from a nonselective pause process but does not entirely account for the stopping-interference effect. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10472494 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104724942023-09-02 A global pause generates nonselective response inhibition during selective stopping Wadsley, Corey G Cirillo, John Nieuwenhuys, Arne Byblow, Winston D Cereb Cortex Original Article Selective response inhibition may be required when stopping a part of a multicomponent action. A persistent response delay (stopping-interference effect) indicates nonselective response inhibition during selective stopping. This study aimed to elucidate whether nonselective response inhibition is the consequence of a global pause process during attentional capture or specific to a nonselective cancel process during selective stopping. Twenty healthy human participants performed a bimanual anticipatory response inhibition paradigm with selective stop and ignore signals. Frontocentral and sensorimotor beta-bursts were recorded with electroencephalography. Corticomotor excitability and short-interval intracortical inhibition in primary motor cortex were recorded with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Behaviorally, responses in the non-signaled hand were delayed during selective ignore and stop trials. The response delay was largest during selective stop trials and indicated that stopping-interference could not be attributed entirely to attentional capture. A stimulus-nonselective increase in frontocentral beta-bursts occurred during stop and ignore trials. Sensorimotor response inhibition was reflected in maintenance of beta-bursts and short-interval intracortical inhibition relative to disinhibition observed during go trials. Response inhibition signatures were not associated with the magnitude of stopping-interference. Therefore, nonselective response inhibition during selective stopping results primarily from a nonselective pause process but does not entirely account for the stopping-interference effect. Oxford University Press 2023-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10472494/ /pubmed/37395336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhad239 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permission@oup.com. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Original Article Wadsley, Corey G Cirillo, John Nieuwenhuys, Arne Byblow, Winston D A global pause generates nonselective response inhibition during selective stopping |
title | A global pause generates nonselective response inhibition during selective stopping |
title_full | A global pause generates nonselective response inhibition during selective stopping |
title_fullStr | A global pause generates nonselective response inhibition during selective stopping |
title_full_unstemmed | A global pause generates nonselective response inhibition during selective stopping |
title_short | A global pause generates nonselective response inhibition during selective stopping |
title_sort | global pause generates nonselective response inhibition during selective stopping |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10472494/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37395336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhad239 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wadsleycoreyg aglobalpausegeneratesnonselectiveresponseinhibitionduringselectivestopping AT cirillojohn aglobalpausegeneratesnonselectiveresponseinhibitionduringselectivestopping AT nieuwenhuysarne aglobalpausegeneratesnonselectiveresponseinhibitionduringselectivestopping AT byblowwinstond aglobalpausegeneratesnonselectiveresponseinhibitionduringselectivestopping AT wadsleycoreyg globalpausegeneratesnonselectiveresponseinhibitionduringselectivestopping AT cirillojohn globalpausegeneratesnonselectiveresponseinhibitionduringselectivestopping AT nieuwenhuysarne globalpausegeneratesnonselectiveresponseinhibitionduringselectivestopping AT byblowwinstond globalpausegeneratesnonselectiveresponseinhibitionduringselectivestopping |