Cargando…

A global pause generates nonselective response inhibition during selective stopping

Selective response inhibition may be required when stopping a part of a multicomponent action. A persistent response delay (stopping-interference effect) indicates nonselective response inhibition during selective stopping. This study aimed to elucidate whether nonselective response inhibition is th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wadsley, Corey G, Cirillo, John, Nieuwenhuys, Arne, Byblow, Winston D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10472494/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37395336
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhad239
_version_ 1785100087202938880
author Wadsley, Corey G
Cirillo, John
Nieuwenhuys, Arne
Byblow, Winston D
author_facet Wadsley, Corey G
Cirillo, John
Nieuwenhuys, Arne
Byblow, Winston D
author_sort Wadsley, Corey G
collection PubMed
description Selective response inhibition may be required when stopping a part of a multicomponent action. A persistent response delay (stopping-interference effect) indicates nonselective response inhibition during selective stopping. This study aimed to elucidate whether nonselective response inhibition is the consequence of a global pause process during attentional capture or specific to a nonselective cancel process during selective stopping. Twenty healthy human participants performed a bimanual anticipatory response inhibition paradigm with selective stop and ignore signals. Frontocentral and sensorimotor beta-bursts were recorded with electroencephalography. Corticomotor excitability and short-interval intracortical inhibition in primary motor cortex were recorded with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Behaviorally, responses in the non-signaled hand were delayed during selective ignore and stop trials. The response delay was largest during selective stop trials and indicated that stopping-interference could not be attributed entirely to attentional capture. A stimulus-nonselective increase in frontocentral beta-bursts occurred during stop and ignore trials. Sensorimotor response inhibition was reflected in maintenance of beta-bursts and short-interval intracortical inhibition relative to disinhibition observed during go trials. Response inhibition signatures were not associated with the magnitude of stopping-interference. Therefore, nonselective response inhibition during selective stopping results primarily from a nonselective pause process but does not entirely account for the stopping-interference effect.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10472494
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104724942023-09-02 A global pause generates nonselective response inhibition during selective stopping Wadsley, Corey G Cirillo, John Nieuwenhuys, Arne Byblow, Winston D Cereb Cortex Original Article Selective response inhibition may be required when stopping a part of a multicomponent action. A persistent response delay (stopping-interference effect) indicates nonselective response inhibition during selective stopping. This study aimed to elucidate whether nonselective response inhibition is the consequence of a global pause process during attentional capture or specific to a nonselective cancel process during selective stopping. Twenty healthy human participants performed a bimanual anticipatory response inhibition paradigm with selective stop and ignore signals. Frontocentral and sensorimotor beta-bursts were recorded with electroencephalography. Corticomotor excitability and short-interval intracortical inhibition in primary motor cortex were recorded with transcranial magnetic stimulation. Behaviorally, responses in the non-signaled hand were delayed during selective ignore and stop trials. The response delay was largest during selective stop trials and indicated that stopping-interference could not be attributed entirely to attentional capture. A stimulus-nonselective increase in frontocentral beta-bursts occurred during stop and ignore trials. Sensorimotor response inhibition was reflected in maintenance of beta-bursts and short-interval intracortical inhibition relative to disinhibition observed during go trials. Response inhibition signatures were not associated with the magnitude of stopping-interference. Therefore, nonselective response inhibition during selective stopping results primarily from a nonselective pause process but does not entirely account for the stopping-interference effect. Oxford University Press 2023-07-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10472494/ /pubmed/37395336 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhad239 Text en © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permission@oup.com. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Original Article
Wadsley, Corey G
Cirillo, John
Nieuwenhuys, Arne
Byblow, Winston D
A global pause generates nonselective response inhibition during selective stopping
title A global pause generates nonselective response inhibition during selective stopping
title_full A global pause generates nonselective response inhibition during selective stopping
title_fullStr A global pause generates nonselective response inhibition during selective stopping
title_full_unstemmed A global pause generates nonselective response inhibition during selective stopping
title_short A global pause generates nonselective response inhibition during selective stopping
title_sort global pause generates nonselective response inhibition during selective stopping
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10472494/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37395336
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhad239
work_keys_str_mv AT wadsleycoreyg aglobalpausegeneratesnonselectiveresponseinhibitionduringselectivestopping
AT cirillojohn aglobalpausegeneratesnonselectiveresponseinhibitionduringselectivestopping
AT nieuwenhuysarne aglobalpausegeneratesnonselectiveresponseinhibitionduringselectivestopping
AT byblowwinstond aglobalpausegeneratesnonselectiveresponseinhibitionduringselectivestopping
AT wadsleycoreyg globalpausegeneratesnonselectiveresponseinhibitionduringselectivestopping
AT cirillojohn globalpausegeneratesnonselectiveresponseinhibitionduringselectivestopping
AT nieuwenhuysarne globalpausegeneratesnonselectiveresponseinhibitionduringselectivestopping
AT byblowwinstond globalpausegeneratesnonselectiveresponseinhibitionduringselectivestopping