Cargando…
Ranking Research Methodology by Risk — a cross-sectional study to determine the opinion of research ethics committee members
BACKGROUND: When reviewing a protocol, research ethics committees (RECs, equivalent to institutional review boards — IRBs) have the responsibility to consider whether the proposed research is justified. If research is not justified, it can waste participants’ time, researchers’ time and resources. A...
Autores principales: | Kolstoe, Simon E., Durning, Jennifer, Yost, Jennifer, Aleksandrova-Yankulovska, Silviya |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10472668/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37658420 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13643-023-02295-1 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Registration audit of clinical trials given a favourable opinion by UK research ethics committees
por: Denneny, Carla, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Determining the level of data sharing, and number of publications, from research databases that have been given a favourable opinion by UK research ethics committees
por: Trace, Samantha, et al.
Publicado: (2020) -
Evidence from UK Research Ethics Committee members on what makes a good research ethics review, and what can be improved
por: Sidaway, Mark, et al.
Publicado: (2023) -
Measuring inconsistency in research ethics committee review
por: Trace, Samantha, et al.
Publicado: (2017) -
On the application of AI in ethical decision-making in research ethics and ethics education
por: Anov, A, et al.
Publicado: (2023)