Cargando…
Clinical indicators for recommending continued care to patients with neck pain in chiropractic practice: a cohort study
BACKGROUND: Chiropractors’ clinical indicators for recommending preventive continued care to patients with low back pain include previous pain episodes, a history of long pain duration and improvement after initial treatment. Our objectives were, in a cohort of patients with neck pain, to examine wh...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10472687/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37653398 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-023-00507-y |
_version_ | 1785100133804802048 |
---|---|
author | Myhrvold, Birgitte Lawaetz Vøllestad, Nina K Irgens, Pernille Robinson, Hilde Stendal Axén, Iben |
author_facet | Myhrvold, Birgitte Lawaetz Vøllestad, Nina K Irgens, Pernille Robinson, Hilde Stendal Axén, Iben |
author_sort | Myhrvold, Birgitte Lawaetz |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Chiropractors’ clinical indicators for recommending preventive continued care to patients with low back pain include previous pain episodes, a history of long pain duration and improvement after initial treatment. Our objectives were, in a cohort of patients with neck pain, to examine whether these clinical indicators were associated with being recommended continued care beyond 4 weeks, and if so whether this recommendation was dependent of chiropractor characteristics, as well as if the number of clinical indicators influenced this recommendation. METHODS: In this multi-center observational study, 172 patients seeking care for a new episode of neck pain in chiropractic practice in Norway were included between September 2015 and May 2016. The chiropractors treated their patients as per usual, and for this study, baseline data and 4-week follow-up data were used. Patient data included the clinical indicators (1) previous episodes of neck pain, (2) a history of long duration neck pain and (3) improvement four weeks after initial treatment. The recruiting chiropractors were asked at 4-week follow-up if each patient was recommended continued care, defined as care planned beyond the first 4 weeks. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models investigated the association between clinical indicators and the continued care recommendation, as well as the influence of chiropractor characteristics on this recommendation. Cross tabulations investigated the relationship between the number of indicators present and recommendation of continued care. RESULTS: Long duration of neck pain was the strongest clinical indicator for being recommended continued care 4 weeks after the initial treatment. Chiropractor characteristics were not associated with this recommendation. In patients with all three clinical indicators present, 39% were recommended continued care. When two and one indicators were present, the percentages of those recommended continued care were 25% and 10%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Chiropractors recommended continued care for patients experiencing neck pain based on their history of long pain duration, and this was not influenced by characteristics of the chiropractor. This differs from previous studies of indicators for maintenance care in patients with low back pain. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12998-023-00507-y. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10472687 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104726872023-09-02 Clinical indicators for recommending continued care to patients with neck pain in chiropractic practice: a cohort study Myhrvold, Birgitte Lawaetz Vøllestad, Nina K Irgens, Pernille Robinson, Hilde Stendal Axén, Iben Chiropr Man Therap Research BACKGROUND: Chiropractors’ clinical indicators for recommending preventive continued care to patients with low back pain include previous pain episodes, a history of long pain duration and improvement after initial treatment. Our objectives were, in a cohort of patients with neck pain, to examine whether these clinical indicators were associated with being recommended continued care beyond 4 weeks, and if so whether this recommendation was dependent of chiropractor characteristics, as well as if the number of clinical indicators influenced this recommendation. METHODS: In this multi-center observational study, 172 patients seeking care for a new episode of neck pain in chiropractic practice in Norway were included between September 2015 and May 2016. The chiropractors treated their patients as per usual, and for this study, baseline data and 4-week follow-up data were used. Patient data included the clinical indicators (1) previous episodes of neck pain, (2) a history of long duration neck pain and (3) improvement four weeks after initial treatment. The recruiting chiropractors were asked at 4-week follow-up if each patient was recommended continued care, defined as care planned beyond the first 4 weeks. Univariate and multivariable logistic regression models investigated the association between clinical indicators and the continued care recommendation, as well as the influence of chiropractor characteristics on this recommendation. Cross tabulations investigated the relationship between the number of indicators present and recommendation of continued care. RESULTS: Long duration of neck pain was the strongest clinical indicator for being recommended continued care 4 weeks after the initial treatment. Chiropractor characteristics were not associated with this recommendation. In patients with all three clinical indicators present, 39% were recommended continued care. When two and one indicators were present, the percentages of those recommended continued care were 25% and 10%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Chiropractors recommended continued care for patients experiencing neck pain based on their history of long pain duration, and this was not influenced by characteristics of the chiropractor. This differs from previous studies of indicators for maintenance care in patients with low back pain. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12998-023-00507-y. BioMed Central 2023-08-31 /pmc/articles/PMC10472687/ /pubmed/37653398 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-023-00507-y Text en © The Author(s) 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Myhrvold, Birgitte Lawaetz Vøllestad, Nina K Irgens, Pernille Robinson, Hilde Stendal Axén, Iben Clinical indicators for recommending continued care to patients with neck pain in chiropractic practice: a cohort study |
title | Clinical indicators for recommending continued care to patients with neck pain in chiropractic practice: a cohort study |
title_full | Clinical indicators for recommending continued care to patients with neck pain in chiropractic practice: a cohort study |
title_fullStr | Clinical indicators for recommending continued care to patients with neck pain in chiropractic practice: a cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical indicators for recommending continued care to patients with neck pain in chiropractic practice: a cohort study |
title_short | Clinical indicators for recommending continued care to patients with neck pain in chiropractic practice: a cohort study |
title_sort | clinical indicators for recommending continued care to patients with neck pain in chiropractic practice: a cohort study |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10472687/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37653398 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12998-023-00507-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT myhrvoldbirgittelawaetz clinicalindicatorsforrecommendingcontinuedcaretopatientswithneckpaininchiropracticpracticeacohortstudy AT vøllestadninak clinicalindicatorsforrecommendingcontinuedcaretopatientswithneckpaininchiropracticpracticeacohortstudy AT irgenspernille clinicalindicatorsforrecommendingcontinuedcaretopatientswithneckpaininchiropracticpracticeacohortstudy AT robinsonhildestendal clinicalindicatorsforrecommendingcontinuedcaretopatientswithneckpaininchiropracticpracticeacohortstudy AT axeniben clinicalindicatorsforrecommendingcontinuedcaretopatientswithneckpaininchiropracticpracticeacohortstudy |