Cargando…

Preferences and end of life care for residents of aged care facilities: a mixed methods study

BACKGROUND: Residential aged care facilities is one of the most common places to deliver of end of life care. A lack of evidence regarding preferred place for end of life care for residents of aged care facilities impacts on delivery of care and prevents assessment of quality of care. This paper rep...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sarah, Moberley, Jacqui, Hewitt, John, Attia, Janean, Cole, Joelle, Bevington, Christopher, Oldmeadow, Zach, Howard, Rachel, Hughes
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10472708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37658403
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-023-01239-9
_version_ 1785100139284660224
author Sarah, Moberley
Jacqui, Hewitt
John, Attia
Janean, Cole
Joelle, Bevington
Christopher, Oldmeadow
Zach, Howard
Rachel, Hughes
author_facet Sarah, Moberley
Jacqui, Hewitt
John, Attia
Janean, Cole
Joelle, Bevington
Christopher, Oldmeadow
Zach, Howard
Rachel, Hughes
author_sort Sarah, Moberley
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Residential aged care facilities is one of the most common places to deliver of end of life care. A lack of evidence regarding preferred place for end of life care for residents of aged care facilities impacts on delivery of care and prevents assessment of quality of care. This paper reports the preferences, current status of end of life care and enablers and barriers of care being delivered in line with the wishes of residents of participating aged care facilities. METHODS: We collaborated with six equally sized aged care facilities from the Greater Newcastle area, New South Wales, Australia. An audit of the quality of end of life care for residents was conducted by retrospective medical record review (n = 234 deceased patients). A retrospective review of emergency department transfers was conducted to determine the rate of transfer and assign avoidable or not. Qualitative focus group and individual interviews were conducted and analysed for barriers and enablers to end of life care being delivered in accordance with residents’ wishes. RESULTS: Most residents (96.7%) wished to remain in their residential aged care facility if their health deteriorated in an expected way. Residents of facilities whose model of care integrated nurse practitioners had the lowest rates of emergency department transfers and timelier symptom management at end of life. Family decision making influenced location of death (either supporting or preventing care in place of patient preference). CONCLUSION(S): To better provide care in accordance with a person’s wishes, aged care facilities need to be supported to enable end of life care insitu through integrated care with relevant palliative care providers, education and communication strategies. Family and community health and death literacy interventions should accompany clinical innovation to ensure delivery of care in accordance with residents’ preferences. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12904-023-01239-9.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10472708
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104727082023-09-02 Preferences and end of life care for residents of aged care facilities: a mixed methods study Sarah, Moberley Jacqui, Hewitt John, Attia Janean, Cole Joelle, Bevington Christopher, Oldmeadow Zach, Howard Rachel, Hughes BMC Palliat Care Research BACKGROUND: Residential aged care facilities is one of the most common places to deliver of end of life care. A lack of evidence regarding preferred place for end of life care for residents of aged care facilities impacts on delivery of care and prevents assessment of quality of care. This paper reports the preferences, current status of end of life care and enablers and barriers of care being delivered in line with the wishes of residents of participating aged care facilities. METHODS: We collaborated with six equally sized aged care facilities from the Greater Newcastle area, New South Wales, Australia. An audit of the quality of end of life care for residents was conducted by retrospective medical record review (n = 234 deceased patients). A retrospective review of emergency department transfers was conducted to determine the rate of transfer and assign avoidable or not. Qualitative focus group and individual interviews were conducted and analysed for barriers and enablers to end of life care being delivered in accordance with residents’ wishes. RESULTS: Most residents (96.7%) wished to remain in their residential aged care facility if their health deteriorated in an expected way. Residents of facilities whose model of care integrated nurse practitioners had the lowest rates of emergency department transfers and timelier symptom management at end of life. Family decision making influenced location of death (either supporting or preventing care in place of patient preference). CONCLUSION(S): To better provide care in accordance with a person’s wishes, aged care facilities need to be supported to enable end of life care insitu through integrated care with relevant palliative care providers, education and communication strategies. Family and community health and death literacy interventions should accompany clinical innovation to ensure delivery of care in accordance with residents’ preferences. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12904-023-01239-9. BioMed Central 2023-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10472708/ /pubmed/37658403 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-023-01239-9 Text en © Crown 2023 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Sarah, Moberley
Jacqui, Hewitt
John, Attia
Janean, Cole
Joelle, Bevington
Christopher, Oldmeadow
Zach, Howard
Rachel, Hughes
Preferences and end of life care for residents of aged care facilities: a mixed methods study
title Preferences and end of life care for residents of aged care facilities: a mixed methods study
title_full Preferences and end of life care for residents of aged care facilities: a mixed methods study
title_fullStr Preferences and end of life care for residents of aged care facilities: a mixed methods study
title_full_unstemmed Preferences and end of life care for residents of aged care facilities: a mixed methods study
title_short Preferences and end of life care for residents of aged care facilities: a mixed methods study
title_sort preferences and end of life care for residents of aged care facilities: a mixed methods study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10472708/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37658403
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12904-023-01239-9
work_keys_str_mv AT sarahmoberley preferencesandendoflifecareforresidentsofagedcarefacilitiesamixedmethodsstudy
AT jacquihewitt preferencesandendoflifecareforresidentsofagedcarefacilitiesamixedmethodsstudy
AT johnattia preferencesandendoflifecareforresidentsofagedcarefacilitiesamixedmethodsstudy
AT janeancole preferencesandendoflifecareforresidentsofagedcarefacilitiesamixedmethodsstudy
AT joellebevington preferencesandendoflifecareforresidentsofagedcarefacilitiesamixedmethodsstudy
AT christopheroldmeadow preferencesandendoflifecareforresidentsofagedcarefacilitiesamixedmethodsstudy
AT zachhoward preferencesandendoflifecareforresidentsofagedcarefacilitiesamixedmethodsstudy
AT rachelhughes preferencesandendoflifecareforresidentsofagedcarefacilitiesamixedmethodsstudy