Cargando…

Reliability and validity of brain‐gastric phase synchronization

Recent studies have reported that various brain regions, mainly sensory, unimodal regions, display phase synchronization with the stomach's slow (0.05 Hz) myoelectrical rhythm. These gastric–brain interactions have broad implications, from feeding behavior to functional gastrointestinal disorde...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Levakov, Gidon, Ganor, Shira, Avidan, Galia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10472921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37528686
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.26436
_version_ 1785100172139692032
author Levakov, Gidon
Ganor, Shira
Avidan, Galia
author_facet Levakov, Gidon
Ganor, Shira
Avidan, Galia
author_sort Levakov, Gidon
collection PubMed
description Recent studies have reported that various brain regions, mainly sensory, unimodal regions, display phase synchronization with the stomach's slow (0.05 Hz) myoelectrical rhythm. These gastric–brain interactions have broad implications, from feeding behavior to functional gastrointestinal disorders. However, in contrast to other interoceptive signals (e.g., heart rate) and their relation to the brain, little is known about the reliability of these gastric–brain interactions, their robustness to artifacts such as motion, and whether they can be generalized to new samples. Here we examined these aspects in 43 subjects that had undergone multiple runs of concurrent electrogastrography (EGG), brain fMRI, and pulse oximetry. We also repeated all analyses in an open dataset of a highly sampled individual. We found a set of brain regions that were coupled with the EGG signal after controlling for non‐grey matter (GM) signals, head motion, and cardiac artifacts. These regions exhibited significant overlap with previous work. However, we also showed that prior to confound regression, the spatial extent of the gastric network was largely overestimated. Finally, we found substantial test–retest reliability in both the brain and the gastric signals when estimated alone, but not for measures of gastric‐brain synchrony. Together, these results provide methodological scaffolding for future research into brain–stomach interactions and for a better understanding of the role of the gastric network.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10472921
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104729212023-09-02 Reliability and validity of brain‐gastric phase synchronization Levakov, Gidon Ganor, Shira Avidan, Galia Hum Brain Mapp Research Articles Recent studies have reported that various brain regions, mainly sensory, unimodal regions, display phase synchronization with the stomach's slow (0.05 Hz) myoelectrical rhythm. These gastric–brain interactions have broad implications, from feeding behavior to functional gastrointestinal disorders. However, in contrast to other interoceptive signals (e.g., heart rate) and their relation to the brain, little is known about the reliability of these gastric–brain interactions, their robustness to artifacts such as motion, and whether they can be generalized to new samples. Here we examined these aspects in 43 subjects that had undergone multiple runs of concurrent electrogastrography (EGG), brain fMRI, and pulse oximetry. We also repeated all analyses in an open dataset of a highly sampled individual. We found a set of brain regions that were coupled with the EGG signal after controlling for non‐grey matter (GM) signals, head motion, and cardiac artifacts. These regions exhibited significant overlap with previous work. However, we also showed that prior to confound regression, the spatial extent of the gastric network was largely overestimated. Finally, we found substantial test–retest reliability in both the brain and the gastric signals when estimated alone, but not for measures of gastric‐brain synchrony. Together, these results provide methodological scaffolding for future research into brain–stomach interactions and for a better understanding of the role of the gastric network. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2023-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10472921/ /pubmed/37528686 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.26436 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Human Brain Mapping published by Wiley Periodicals LLC. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Levakov, Gidon
Ganor, Shira
Avidan, Galia
Reliability and validity of brain‐gastric phase synchronization
title Reliability and validity of brain‐gastric phase synchronization
title_full Reliability and validity of brain‐gastric phase synchronization
title_fullStr Reliability and validity of brain‐gastric phase synchronization
title_full_unstemmed Reliability and validity of brain‐gastric phase synchronization
title_short Reliability and validity of brain‐gastric phase synchronization
title_sort reliability and validity of brain‐gastric phase synchronization
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10472921/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37528686
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/hbm.26436
work_keys_str_mv AT levakovgidon reliabilityandvalidityofbraingastricphasesynchronization
AT ganorshira reliabilityandvalidityofbraingastricphasesynchronization
AT avidangalia reliabilityandvalidityofbraingastricphasesynchronization