Cargando…

Comparison of turbidometric immunoassay, refractometry, and gamma‐glutamyl transferase to radial immunodiffusion for assessment of transfer of passive immunity in high‐risk beef calves

BACKGROUND: Attainment of adequate transfer of passive immunity (TPI) is critical to health of calves; however, studies comparing available tools for measurement of TPI in individual beef animals are limited. OBJECTIVES: To report agreement between 4 tests evaluating individual TPI status in beef ca...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kreuder, Amanda J., Breuer, Ryan M., Wiley, Caitlin, Dohlman, Tyler, Smith, Joseph S., McKeen, Lauren
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10473048/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37549250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvim.16831
_version_ 1785100194155593728
author Kreuder, Amanda J.
Breuer, Ryan M.
Wiley, Caitlin
Dohlman, Tyler
Smith, Joseph S.
McKeen, Lauren
author_facet Kreuder, Amanda J.
Breuer, Ryan M.
Wiley, Caitlin
Dohlman, Tyler
Smith, Joseph S.
McKeen, Lauren
author_sort Kreuder, Amanda J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Attainment of adequate transfer of passive immunity (TPI) is critical to health of calves; however, studies comparing available tools for measurement of TPI in individual beef animals are limited. OBJECTIVES: To report agreement between 4 tests evaluating individual TPI status in beef calves. ANIMALS: One hundred ninety‐six beef calves born to cows and heifers presenting for calving management or dystocia. METHODS: Retrospective study to assess serum immunoglobulin (IgG) concentrations via turbidimetric immunoassay (TI), gamma‐glutamyl transferase (GGT), serum total protein (TP), and single radial immunodiffusion (RID; reference standard). Test agreement was evaluated using Passing‐Bablok regression, Bland‐Altman analysis, Cohen's kappa, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves with and without covariate adjustment to determine optimal thresholds. RESULTS: Correlation between RID and test results varied: TI, ρ = 0.757; TP, ρ = 0.715; GGT: ρ = 0.413. For the TI compared to RID, regression analysis identified a constant (intercept = −0.51 [CI: −2.63, 3.05]) and proportional (slope = 1.87 [CI: 1.69, 2.08]) bias. Based on ROC, TI concentrations of ≤9.89 and ≤13.76 g/L, and TP concentrations of ≤5.5 and ≤6.0 g/dL, indicated IgG concentrations <18.0 and <25.0 g/L, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Within this cohort of calves, TI demonstrated the best correlation with RID; however, significant bias was identified which led to frequent underestimation of IgG concentration. Serum total protein demonstrated less correlation with RID but had less misclassification than TI. Both TI and TP demonstrated less correlation for calves that received colostrum replacement prompting clinical awareness of colostrum type when evaluating individual TPI in beef calves.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10473048
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104730482023-09-02 Comparison of turbidometric immunoassay, refractometry, and gamma‐glutamyl transferase to radial immunodiffusion for assessment of transfer of passive immunity in high‐risk beef calves Kreuder, Amanda J. Breuer, Ryan M. Wiley, Caitlin Dohlman, Tyler Smith, Joseph S. McKeen, Lauren J Vet Intern Med FOOD ANIMAL BACKGROUND: Attainment of adequate transfer of passive immunity (TPI) is critical to health of calves; however, studies comparing available tools for measurement of TPI in individual beef animals are limited. OBJECTIVES: To report agreement between 4 tests evaluating individual TPI status in beef calves. ANIMALS: One hundred ninety‐six beef calves born to cows and heifers presenting for calving management or dystocia. METHODS: Retrospective study to assess serum immunoglobulin (IgG) concentrations via turbidimetric immunoassay (TI), gamma‐glutamyl transferase (GGT), serum total protein (TP), and single radial immunodiffusion (RID; reference standard). Test agreement was evaluated using Passing‐Bablok regression, Bland‐Altman analysis, Cohen's kappa, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves with and without covariate adjustment to determine optimal thresholds. RESULTS: Correlation between RID and test results varied: TI, ρ = 0.757; TP, ρ = 0.715; GGT: ρ = 0.413. For the TI compared to RID, regression analysis identified a constant (intercept = −0.51 [CI: −2.63, 3.05]) and proportional (slope = 1.87 [CI: 1.69, 2.08]) bias. Based on ROC, TI concentrations of ≤9.89 and ≤13.76 g/L, and TP concentrations of ≤5.5 and ≤6.0 g/dL, indicated IgG concentrations <18.0 and <25.0 g/L, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Within this cohort of calves, TI demonstrated the best correlation with RID; however, significant bias was identified which led to frequent underestimation of IgG concentration. Serum total protein demonstrated less correlation with RID but had less misclassification than TI. Both TI and TP demonstrated less correlation for calves that received colostrum replacement prompting clinical awareness of colostrum type when evaluating individual TPI in beef calves. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2023-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10473048/ /pubmed/37549250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvim.16831 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle FOOD ANIMAL
Kreuder, Amanda J.
Breuer, Ryan M.
Wiley, Caitlin
Dohlman, Tyler
Smith, Joseph S.
McKeen, Lauren
Comparison of turbidometric immunoassay, refractometry, and gamma‐glutamyl transferase to radial immunodiffusion for assessment of transfer of passive immunity in high‐risk beef calves
title Comparison of turbidometric immunoassay, refractometry, and gamma‐glutamyl transferase to radial immunodiffusion for assessment of transfer of passive immunity in high‐risk beef calves
title_full Comparison of turbidometric immunoassay, refractometry, and gamma‐glutamyl transferase to radial immunodiffusion for assessment of transfer of passive immunity in high‐risk beef calves
title_fullStr Comparison of turbidometric immunoassay, refractometry, and gamma‐glutamyl transferase to radial immunodiffusion for assessment of transfer of passive immunity in high‐risk beef calves
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of turbidometric immunoassay, refractometry, and gamma‐glutamyl transferase to radial immunodiffusion for assessment of transfer of passive immunity in high‐risk beef calves
title_short Comparison of turbidometric immunoassay, refractometry, and gamma‐glutamyl transferase to radial immunodiffusion for assessment of transfer of passive immunity in high‐risk beef calves
title_sort comparison of turbidometric immunoassay, refractometry, and gamma‐glutamyl transferase to radial immunodiffusion for assessment of transfer of passive immunity in high‐risk beef calves
topic FOOD ANIMAL
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10473048/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37549250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvim.16831
work_keys_str_mv AT kreuderamandaj comparisonofturbidometricimmunoassayrefractometryandgammaglutamyltransferasetoradialimmunodiffusionforassessmentoftransferofpassiveimmunityinhighriskbeefcalves
AT breuerryanm comparisonofturbidometricimmunoassayrefractometryandgammaglutamyltransferasetoradialimmunodiffusionforassessmentoftransferofpassiveimmunityinhighriskbeefcalves
AT wileycaitlin comparisonofturbidometricimmunoassayrefractometryandgammaglutamyltransferasetoradialimmunodiffusionforassessmentoftransferofpassiveimmunityinhighriskbeefcalves
AT dohlmantyler comparisonofturbidometricimmunoassayrefractometryandgammaglutamyltransferasetoradialimmunodiffusionforassessmentoftransferofpassiveimmunityinhighriskbeefcalves
AT smithjosephs comparisonofturbidometricimmunoassayrefractometryandgammaglutamyltransferasetoradialimmunodiffusionforassessmentoftransferofpassiveimmunityinhighriskbeefcalves
AT mckeenlauren comparisonofturbidometricimmunoassayrefractometryandgammaglutamyltransferasetoradialimmunodiffusionforassessmentoftransferofpassiveimmunityinhighriskbeefcalves