Cargando…
Comparison of turbidometric immunoassay, refractometry, and gamma‐glutamyl transferase to radial immunodiffusion for assessment of transfer of passive immunity in high‐risk beef calves
BACKGROUND: Attainment of adequate transfer of passive immunity (TPI) is critical to health of calves; however, studies comparing available tools for measurement of TPI in individual beef animals are limited. OBJECTIVES: To report agreement between 4 tests evaluating individual TPI status in beef ca...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
2023
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10473048/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37549250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvim.16831 |
_version_ | 1785100194155593728 |
---|---|
author | Kreuder, Amanda J. Breuer, Ryan M. Wiley, Caitlin Dohlman, Tyler Smith, Joseph S. McKeen, Lauren |
author_facet | Kreuder, Amanda J. Breuer, Ryan M. Wiley, Caitlin Dohlman, Tyler Smith, Joseph S. McKeen, Lauren |
author_sort | Kreuder, Amanda J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Attainment of adequate transfer of passive immunity (TPI) is critical to health of calves; however, studies comparing available tools for measurement of TPI in individual beef animals are limited. OBJECTIVES: To report agreement between 4 tests evaluating individual TPI status in beef calves. ANIMALS: One hundred ninety‐six beef calves born to cows and heifers presenting for calving management or dystocia. METHODS: Retrospective study to assess serum immunoglobulin (IgG) concentrations via turbidimetric immunoassay (TI), gamma‐glutamyl transferase (GGT), serum total protein (TP), and single radial immunodiffusion (RID; reference standard). Test agreement was evaluated using Passing‐Bablok regression, Bland‐Altman analysis, Cohen's kappa, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves with and without covariate adjustment to determine optimal thresholds. RESULTS: Correlation between RID and test results varied: TI, ρ = 0.757; TP, ρ = 0.715; GGT: ρ = 0.413. For the TI compared to RID, regression analysis identified a constant (intercept = −0.51 [CI: −2.63, 3.05]) and proportional (slope = 1.87 [CI: 1.69, 2.08]) bias. Based on ROC, TI concentrations of ≤9.89 and ≤13.76 g/L, and TP concentrations of ≤5.5 and ≤6.0 g/dL, indicated IgG concentrations <18.0 and <25.0 g/L, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Within this cohort of calves, TI demonstrated the best correlation with RID; however, significant bias was identified which led to frequent underestimation of IgG concentration. Serum total protein demonstrated less correlation with RID but had less misclassification than TI. Both TI and TP demonstrated less correlation for calves that received colostrum replacement prompting clinical awareness of colostrum type when evaluating individual TPI in beef calves. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-10473048 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2023 |
publisher | John Wiley & Sons, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-104730482023-09-02 Comparison of turbidometric immunoassay, refractometry, and gamma‐glutamyl transferase to radial immunodiffusion for assessment of transfer of passive immunity in high‐risk beef calves Kreuder, Amanda J. Breuer, Ryan M. Wiley, Caitlin Dohlman, Tyler Smith, Joseph S. McKeen, Lauren J Vet Intern Med FOOD ANIMAL BACKGROUND: Attainment of adequate transfer of passive immunity (TPI) is critical to health of calves; however, studies comparing available tools for measurement of TPI in individual beef animals are limited. OBJECTIVES: To report agreement between 4 tests evaluating individual TPI status in beef calves. ANIMALS: One hundred ninety‐six beef calves born to cows and heifers presenting for calving management or dystocia. METHODS: Retrospective study to assess serum immunoglobulin (IgG) concentrations via turbidimetric immunoassay (TI), gamma‐glutamyl transferase (GGT), serum total protein (TP), and single radial immunodiffusion (RID; reference standard). Test agreement was evaluated using Passing‐Bablok regression, Bland‐Altman analysis, Cohen's kappa, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves with and without covariate adjustment to determine optimal thresholds. RESULTS: Correlation between RID and test results varied: TI, ρ = 0.757; TP, ρ = 0.715; GGT: ρ = 0.413. For the TI compared to RID, regression analysis identified a constant (intercept = −0.51 [CI: −2.63, 3.05]) and proportional (slope = 1.87 [CI: 1.69, 2.08]) bias. Based on ROC, TI concentrations of ≤9.89 and ≤13.76 g/L, and TP concentrations of ≤5.5 and ≤6.0 g/dL, indicated IgG concentrations <18.0 and <25.0 g/L, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Within this cohort of calves, TI demonstrated the best correlation with RID; however, significant bias was identified which led to frequent underestimation of IgG concentration. Serum total protein demonstrated less correlation with RID but had less misclassification than TI. Both TI and TP demonstrated less correlation for calves that received colostrum replacement prompting clinical awareness of colostrum type when evaluating individual TPI in beef calves. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2023-08-07 /pmc/articles/PMC10473048/ /pubmed/37549250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvim.16831 Text en © 2023 The Authors. Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | FOOD ANIMAL Kreuder, Amanda J. Breuer, Ryan M. Wiley, Caitlin Dohlman, Tyler Smith, Joseph S. McKeen, Lauren Comparison of turbidometric immunoassay, refractometry, and gamma‐glutamyl transferase to radial immunodiffusion for assessment of transfer of passive immunity in high‐risk beef calves |
title | Comparison of turbidometric immunoassay, refractometry, and gamma‐glutamyl transferase to radial immunodiffusion for assessment of transfer of passive immunity in high‐risk beef calves |
title_full | Comparison of turbidometric immunoassay, refractometry, and gamma‐glutamyl transferase to radial immunodiffusion for assessment of transfer of passive immunity in high‐risk beef calves |
title_fullStr | Comparison of turbidometric immunoassay, refractometry, and gamma‐glutamyl transferase to radial immunodiffusion for assessment of transfer of passive immunity in high‐risk beef calves |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of turbidometric immunoassay, refractometry, and gamma‐glutamyl transferase to radial immunodiffusion for assessment of transfer of passive immunity in high‐risk beef calves |
title_short | Comparison of turbidometric immunoassay, refractometry, and gamma‐glutamyl transferase to radial immunodiffusion for assessment of transfer of passive immunity in high‐risk beef calves |
title_sort | comparison of turbidometric immunoassay, refractometry, and gamma‐glutamyl transferase to radial immunodiffusion for assessment of transfer of passive immunity in high‐risk beef calves |
topic | FOOD ANIMAL |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10473048/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37549250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jvim.16831 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kreuderamandaj comparisonofturbidometricimmunoassayrefractometryandgammaglutamyltransferasetoradialimmunodiffusionforassessmentoftransferofpassiveimmunityinhighriskbeefcalves AT breuerryanm comparisonofturbidometricimmunoassayrefractometryandgammaglutamyltransferasetoradialimmunodiffusionforassessmentoftransferofpassiveimmunityinhighriskbeefcalves AT wileycaitlin comparisonofturbidometricimmunoassayrefractometryandgammaglutamyltransferasetoradialimmunodiffusionforassessmentoftransferofpassiveimmunityinhighriskbeefcalves AT dohlmantyler comparisonofturbidometricimmunoassayrefractometryandgammaglutamyltransferasetoradialimmunodiffusionforassessmentoftransferofpassiveimmunityinhighriskbeefcalves AT smithjosephs comparisonofturbidometricimmunoassayrefractometryandgammaglutamyltransferasetoradialimmunodiffusionforassessmentoftransferofpassiveimmunityinhighriskbeefcalves AT mckeenlauren comparisonofturbidometricimmunoassayrefractometryandgammaglutamyltransferasetoradialimmunodiffusionforassessmentoftransferofpassiveimmunityinhighriskbeefcalves |