Cargando…

Brief Submotor-Threshold Electrical Stimulation Applied Synchronously Over Wrist Flexor and Extensor Muscles does Not Suppress Essential Tremor, Independent of Stimulation Frequency

BACKGROUND: Electrical stimulation of muscles below motoneuron threshold has shown potential as a low-cost and minimally invasive treatment for Essential Tremor (ET). Prior studies have stimulated wrist flexor and extensor muscles synchronously with diverging results, calling for further investigati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Metzner, Christian, Stringham, Adam, Hislop, Brenna, Bonham, Joseph, Chatterton, Larrisa, DeFigueiredo, Ryan, Charles, Steven K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ubiquity Press 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10473161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37663530
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/tohm.740
_version_ 1785100222108532736
author Metzner, Christian
Stringham, Adam
Hislop, Brenna
Bonham, Joseph
Chatterton, Larrisa
DeFigueiredo, Ryan
Charles, Steven K.
author_facet Metzner, Christian
Stringham, Adam
Hislop, Brenna
Bonham, Joseph
Chatterton, Larrisa
DeFigueiredo, Ryan
Charles, Steven K.
author_sort Metzner, Christian
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Electrical stimulation of muscles below motoneuron threshold has shown potential as a low-cost and minimally invasive treatment for Essential Tremor (ET). Prior studies have stimulated wrist flexor and extensor muscles synchronously with diverging results, calling for further investigation. Also, prior studies have only used a narrow range of stimulation parameters, so stimulation parameters have not been optimized. Our purpose was to further investigate synchronous submotor stimulation and identify the effect of stimulation frequency on tremor suppression. METHODS: We quantified the effect of brief, synchronous stimulation at 15 different frequencies from 10–150 Hz applied over wrist flexors and extensors on both tremor power and frequency in 20 ET patients. We compared tremor power and frequency from hand acceleration and sEMG between pre-, per-, and post-stimulation phases. RESULTS: Our stimulation paradigm did not result in significant tremor suppression or tremor frequency changes at any tested stimulation frequency, showing no significant interaction between phase and stimulation frequency for tremor power measured by either hand acceleration (p = 0.69) or sEMG (p = 0.07). Additionally, the effect of phase interacting with stimulation frequency on tremor frequency was statistically insignificant for acceleration (p = 0.64) and sEMG (p = 0.37). DISCUSSION: We conclude that brief synchronous submotor-threshold stimulation does not reduce tremor in ET patients, independent of stimulation frequency (from 10 to 150 Hz). Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that brief submotor-threshold stimulation suppresses tremor via reciprocal inhibition, which requires asynchronous stimulation. In contrast, it is hypothesized that synchronous stimulation might require longer stimulation durations to affect supraspinal tremor networks. HIGHLIGHTS: We studied the effects of synchronous submotor electrical stimulation over wrist flexor and extensor muscles on Essential Tremor. Our results indicate that suppressing tremor with brief synchronous stimulation is ineffective. Based on recently hypothesized mechanisms of peripheral tremor suppression, we hypothesize that asynchronous stimulation or long-duration synchronous stimulation are more effective approaches to peripheral tremor suppression.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10473161
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Ubiquity Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104731612023-09-02 Brief Submotor-Threshold Electrical Stimulation Applied Synchronously Over Wrist Flexor and Extensor Muscles does Not Suppress Essential Tremor, Independent of Stimulation Frequency Metzner, Christian Stringham, Adam Hislop, Brenna Bonham, Joseph Chatterton, Larrisa DeFigueiredo, Ryan Charles, Steven K. Tremor Other Hyperkinet Mov (N Y) Article BACKGROUND: Electrical stimulation of muscles below motoneuron threshold has shown potential as a low-cost and minimally invasive treatment for Essential Tremor (ET). Prior studies have stimulated wrist flexor and extensor muscles synchronously with diverging results, calling for further investigation. Also, prior studies have only used a narrow range of stimulation parameters, so stimulation parameters have not been optimized. Our purpose was to further investigate synchronous submotor stimulation and identify the effect of stimulation frequency on tremor suppression. METHODS: We quantified the effect of brief, synchronous stimulation at 15 different frequencies from 10–150 Hz applied over wrist flexors and extensors on both tremor power and frequency in 20 ET patients. We compared tremor power and frequency from hand acceleration and sEMG between pre-, per-, and post-stimulation phases. RESULTS: Our stimulation paradigm did not result in significant tremor suppression or tremor frequency changes at any tested stimulation frequency, showing no significant interaction between phase and stimulation frequency for tremor power measured by either hand acceleration (p = 0.69) or sEMG (p = 0.07). Additionally, the effect of phase interacting with stimulation frequency on tremor frequency was statistically insignificant for acceleration (p = 0.64) and sEMG (p = 0.37). DISCUSSION: We conclude that brief synchronous submotor-threshold stimulation does not reduce tremor in ET patients, independent of stimulation frequency (from 10 to 150 Hz). Our results are consistent with the hypothesis that brief submotor-threshold stimulation suppresses tremor via reciprocal inhibition, which requires asynchronous stimulation. In contrast, it is hypothesized that synchronous stimulation might require longer stimulation durations to affect supraspinal tremor networks. HIGHLIGHTS: We studied the effects of synchronous submotor electrical stimulation over wrist flexor and extensor muscles on Essential Tremor. Our results indicate that suppressing tremor with brief synchronous stimulation is ineffective. Based on recently hypothesized mechanisms of peripheral tremor suppression, we hypothesize that asynchronous stimulation or long-duration synchronous stimulation are more effective approaches to peripheral tremor suppression. Ubiquity Press 2023-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10473161/ /pubmed/37663530 http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/tohm.740 Text en Copyright: © 2023 The Author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC-BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Article
Metzner, Christian
Stringham, Adam
Hislop, Brenna
Bonham, Joseph
Chatterton, Larrisa
DeFigueiredo, Ryan
Charles, Steven K.
Brief Submotor-Threshold Electrical Stimulation Applied Synchronously Over Wrist Flexor and Extensor Muscles does Not Suppress Essential Tremor, Independent of Stimulation Frequency
title Brief Submotor-Threshold Electrical Stimulation Applied Synchronously Over Wrist Flexor and Extensor Muscles does Not Suppress Essential Tremor, Independent of Stimulation Frequency
title_full Brief Submotor-Threshold Electrical Stimulation Applied Synchronously Over Wrist Flexor and Extensor Muscles does Not Suppress Essential Tremor, Independent of Stimulation Frequency
title_fullStr Brief Submotor-Threshold Electrical Stimulation Applied Synchronously Over Wrist Flexor and Extensor Muscles does Not Suppress Essential Tremor, Independent of Stimulation Frequency
title_full_unstemmed Brief Submotor-Threshold Electrical Stimulation Applied Synchronously Over Wrist Flexor and Extensor Muscles does Not Suppress Essential Tremor, Independent of Stimulation Frequency
title_short Brief Submotor-Threshold Electrical Stimulation Applied Synchronously Over Wrist Flexor and Extensor Muscles does Not Suppress Essential Tremor, Independent of Stimulation Frequency
title_sort brief submotor-threshold electrical stimulation applied synchronously over wrist flexor and extensor muscles does not suppress essential tremor, independent of stimulation frequency
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10473161/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37663530
http://dx.doi.org/10.5334/tohm.740
work_keys_str_mv AT metznerchristian briefsubmotorthresholdelectricalstimulationappliedsynchronouslyoverwristflexorandextensormusclesdoesnotsuppressessentialtremorindependentofstimulationfrequency
AT stringhamadam briefsubmotorthresholdelectricalstimulationappliedsynchronouslyoverwristflexorandextensormusclesdoesnotsuppressessentialtremorindependentofstimulationfrequency
AT hislopbrenna briefsubmotorthresholdelectricalstimulationappliedsynchronouslyoverwristflexorandextensormusclesdoesnotsuppressessentialtremorindependentofstimulationfrequency
AT bonhamjoseph briefsubmotorthresholdelectricalstimulationappliedsynchronouslyoverwristflexorandextensormusclesdoesnotsuppressessentialtremorindependentofstimulationfrequency
AT chattertonlarrisa briefsubmotorthresholdelectricalstimulationappliedsynchronouslyoverwristflexorandextensormusclesdoesnotsuppressessentialtremorindependentofstimulationfrequency
AT defigueiredoryan briefsubmotorthresholdelectricalstimulationappliedsynchronouslyoverwristflexorandextensormusclesdoesnotsuppressessentialtremorindependentofstimulationfrequency
AT charlesstevenk briefsubmotorthresholdelectricalstimulationappliedsynchronouslyoverwristflexorandextensormusclesdoesnotsuppressessentialtremorindependentofstimulationfrequency