Cargando…

Did the evidence-based intervention (EBI) programme reduce inappropriate procedures, lessen unwarranted variation or lead to spill-over effects in the National Health Service?

BACKGROUND: Health systems are under pressure to maintain services within limited resources. The Evidence-Based Interventions (EBI) programme published a first list of guidelines in 2019, which aimed to reduce inappropriate use of interventions within the NHS in England, reducing potential harm and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Glynn, Joel, Jones, Timothy, Bell, Mike, Blazeby, Jane, Burton, Christopher, Conefrey, Carmel, Donovan, Jenny L., Farrar, Nicola, Morley, Josie, McNair, Angus, Owen-Smith, Amanda, Rule, Ellen, Thornton, Gail, Tucker, Victoria, Williams, Iestyn, Rooshenas, Leila, Hollingworth, William
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2023
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10473535/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37656701
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290996
_version_ 1785100295304380416
author Glynn, Joel
Jones, Timothy
Bell, Mike
Blazeby, Jane
Burton, Christopher
Conefrey, Carmel
Donovan, Jenny L.
Farrar, Nicola
Morley, Josie
McNair, Angus
Owen-Smith, Amanda
Rule, Ellen
Thornton, Gail
Tucker, Victoria
Williams, Iestyn
Rooshenas, Leila
Hollingworth, William
author_facet Glynn, Joel
Jones, Timothy
Bell, Mike
Blazeby, Jane
Burton, Christopher
Conefrey, Carmel
Donovan, Jenny L.
Farrar, Nicola
Morley, Josie
McNair, Angus
Owen-Smith, Amanda
Rule, Ellen
Thornton, Gail
Tucker, Victoria
Williams, Iestyn
Rooshenas, Leila
Hollingworth, William
author_sort Glynn, Joel
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Health systems are under pressure to maintain services within limited resources. The Evidence-Based Interventions (EBI) programme published a first list of guidelines in 2019, which aimed to reduce inappropriate use of interventions within the NHS in England, reducing potential harm and optimising the use of limited resources. Seventeen procedures were selected in the first round, published in April 2019. METHODS: We evaluated changes in the trends for each procedure after its inclusion in the EBI’s first list of guidelines using interrupted time series analysis. We explored whether there was any evidence of spill-over effects onto related or substitute procedures, as well as exploring changes in geographical variation following the publication of national guidance. RESULTS: Most procedures were experiencing downward trends in the years prior to the launch of EBI. We found no evidence of a trend change in any of the 17 procedures following the introduction of the guidance. No evidence of spill-over increases in substitute or related procedures was found. Geographic variation in the number of procedures performed across English CCGs remained at similar levels before and after EBI. CONCLUSIONS: The EBI programme had little success in its aim to further reduce the use of the 17 procedures it deemed inappropriate in all or certain circumstances. Most procedure rates were already decreasing before EBI and all continued with a similar trend afterwards. Geographical variation in the number of procedures remained at a similar level post EBI. De-adoption of inappropriate care is essential in maintaining health systems across the world. However, further research is needed to explore context specific enablers and barriers to effective identification and de-adoption of such inappropriate health care to support future de-adoption endeavours.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-10473535
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2023
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-104735352023-09-02 Did the evidence-based intervention (EBI) programme reduce inappropriate procedures, lessen unwarranted variation or lead to spill-over effects in the National Health Service? Glynn, Joel Jones, Timothy Bell, Mike Blazeby, Jane Burton, Christopher Conefrey, Carmel Donovan, Jenny L. Farrar, Nicola Morley, Josie McNair, Angus Owen-Smith, Amanda Rule, Ellen Thornton, Gail Tucker, Victoria Williams, Iestyn Rooshenas, Leila Hollingworth, William PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Health systems are under pressure to maintain services within limited resources. The Evidence-Based Interventions (EBI) programme published a first list of guidelines in 2019, which aimed to reduce inappropriate use of interventions within the NHS in England, reducing potential harm and optimising the use of limited resources. Seventeen procedures were selected in the first round, published in April 2019. METHODS: We evaluated changes in the trends for each procedure after its inclusion in the EBI’s first list of guidelines using interrupted time series analysis. We explored whether there was any evidence of spill-over effects onto related or substitute procedures, as well as exploring changes in geographical variation following the publication of national guidance. RESULTS: Most procedures were experiencing downward trends in the years prior to the launch of EBI. We found no evidence of a trend change in any of the 17 procedures following the introduction of the guidance. No evidence of spill-over increases in substitute or related procedures was found. Geographic variation in the number of procedures performed across English CCGs remained at similar levels before and after EBI. CONCLUSIONS: The EBI programme had little success in its aim to further reduce the use of the 17 procedures it deemed inappropriate in all or certain circumstances. Most procedure rates were already decreasing before EBI and all continued with a similar trend afterwards. Geographical variation in the number of procedures remained at a similar level post EBI. De-adoption of inappropriate care is essential in maintaining health systems across the world. However, further research is needed to explore context specific enablers and barriers to effective identification and de-adoption of such inappropriate health care to support future de-adoption endeavours. Public Library of Science 2023-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC10473535/ /pubmed/37656701 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290996 Text en © 2023 Glynn et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Glynn, Joel
Jones, Timothy
Bell, Mike
Blazeby, Jane
Burton, Christopher
Conefrey, Carmel
Donovan, Jenny L.
Farrar, Nicola
Morley, Josie
McNair, Angus
Owen-Smith, Amanda
Rule, Ellen
Thornton, Gail
Tucker, Victoria
Williams, Iestyn
Rooshenas, Leila
Hollingworth, William
Did the evidence-based intervention (EBI) programme reduce inappropriate procedures, lessen unwarranted variation or lead to spill-over effects in the National Health Service?
title Did the evidence-based intervention (EBI) programme reduce inappropriate procedures, lessen unwarranted variation or lead to spill-over effects in the National Health Service?
title_full Did the evidence-based intervention (EBI) programme reduce inappropriate procedures, lessen unwarranted variation or lead to spill-over effects in the National Health Service?
title_fullStr Did the evidence-based intervention (EBI) programme reduce inappropriate procedures, lessen unwarranted variation or lead to spill-over effects in the National Health Service?
title_full_unstemmed Did the evidence-based intervention (EBI) programme reduce inappropriate procedures, lessen unwarranted variation or lead to spill-over effects in the National Health Service?
title_short Did the evidence-based intervention (EBI) programme reduce inappropriate procedures, lessen unwarranted variation or lead to spill-over effects in the National Health Service?
title_sort did the evidence-based intervention (ebi) programme reduce inappropriate procedures, lessen unwarranted variation or lead to spill-over effects in the national health service?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10473535/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/37656701
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0290996
work_keys_str_mv AT glynnjoel didtheevidencebasedinterventionebiprogrammereduceinappropriateprocedureslessenunwarrantedvariationorleadtospillovereffectsinthenationalhealthservice
AT jonestimothy didtheevidencebasedinterventionebiprogrammereduceinappropriateprocedureslessenunwarrantedvariationorleadtospillovereffectsinthenationalhealthservice
AT bellmike didtheevidencebasedinterventionebiprogrammereduceinappropriateprocedureslessenunwarrantedvariationorleadtospillovereffectsinthenationalhealthservice
AT blazebyjane didtheevidencebasedinterventionebiprogrammereduceinappropriateprocedureslessenunwarrantedvariationorleadtospillovereffectsinthenationalhealthservice
AT burtonchristopher didtheevidencebasedinterventionebiprogrammereduceinappropriateprocedureslessenunwarrantedvariationorleadtospillovereffectsinthenationalhealthservice
AT conefreycarmel didtheevidencebasedinterventionebiprogrammereduceinappropriateprocedureslessenunwarrantedvariationorleadtospillovereffectsinthenationalhealthservice
AT donovanjennyl didtheevidencebasedinterventionebiprogrammereduceinappropriateprocedureslessenunwarrantedvariationorleadtospillovereffectsinthenationalhealthservice
AT farrarnicola didtheevidencebasedinterventionebiprogrammereduceinappropriateprocedureslessenunwarrantedvariationorleadtospillovereffectsinthenationalhealthservice
AT morleyjosie didtheevidencebasedinterventionebiprogrammereduceinappropriateprocedureslessenunwarrantedvariationorleadtospillovereffectsinthenationalhealthservice
AT mcnairangus didtheevidencebasedinterventionebiprogrammereduceinappropriateprocedureslessenunwarrantedvariationorleadtospillovereffectsinthenationalhealthservice
AT owensmithamanda didtheevidencebasedinterventionebiprogrammereduceinappropriateprocedureslessenunwarrantedvariationorleadtospillovereffectsinthenationalhealthservice
AT ruleellen didtheevidencebasedinterventionebiprogrammereduceinappropriateprocedureslessenunwarrantedvariationorleadtospillovereffectsinthenationalhealthservice
AT thorntongail didtheevidencebasedinterventionebiprogrammereduceinappropriateprocedureslessenunwarrantedvariationorleadtospillovereffectsinthenationalhealthservice
AT tuckervictoria didtheevidencebasedinterventionebiprogrammereduceinappropriateprocedureslessenunwarrantedvariationorleadtospillovereffectsinthenationalhealthservice
AT williamsiestyn didtheevidencebasedinterventionebiprogrammereduceinappropriateprocedureslessenunwarrantedvariationorleadtospillovereffectsinthenationalhealthservice
AT rooshenasleila didtheevidencebasedinterventionebiprogrammereduceinappropriateprocedureslessenunwarrantedvariationorleadtospillovereffectsinthenationalhealthservice
AT hollingworthwilliam didtheevidencebasedinterventionebiprogrammereduceinappropriateprocedureslessenunwarrantedvariationorleadtospillovereffectsinthenationalhealthservice